Research Group Psychosocial Epidemiology & Public Health, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases Site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
Research Group Psychosocial Epidemiology & Public Health, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases Site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 2;12(11):e063135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063135.
Using commercial activity monitors may advance research with older adults. However, usability for the older population is not sufficiently established. This study aims at evaluating the usability of three wrist-worn monitors for older adults. In addition, we report on usability (including data management) for research.
Data were collected cross-sectionally. Between-person of three activity monitor type (Apple Watch 3, Fitbit Charge 4, Polar A370) were made.
The activity monitors were worn in normal daily life in an urban community in Germany. The period of wear was 2 weeks.
Using convenience sampling, we recruited N=27 healthy older adults (≥60 years old) who were not already habitual users of activity monitors.
To evaluate usability from the participant perspective, we used the System Usability Scale (SUS) as well as a study-specific qualitative checklist. Assessment further comprised age, highest academic degree, computer proficiency and affinity for technology interaction. Usability from the researchers' perspective was assessed using quantitative data management markers and a study-specific qualitative check-list.
There was no significant difference between monitors in the SUS. Female gender was associated with higher SUS usability ratings. Qualitative participant-usability reports revealed distinctive shortcomings, for example, in terms of battery life and display readability. Usability for researchers came with problems in data management, such as completeness of the data download.
The usability of the monitors compared in this work differed qualitatively. Yet, the overall usability ratings by participants were comparable. Conversely, from the researchers' perspective, there were crucial differences in data management and usability that should be considered when making monitor choices for future studies.
使用商业活动监测器可以促进老年人的研究。然而,其在老年人群中的可用性尚未得到充分证实。本研究旨在评估三种腕戴式监测器在老年人中的可用性。此外,我们还报告了研究中可用性(包括数据管理)的情况。
数据是跨时段收集的。在个体间对三种活动监测器类型(Apple Watch 3、Fitbit Charge 4、Polar A370)进行了比较。
活动监测器在德国城市社区的日常生活中正常佩戴。佩戴时间为 2 周。
使用便利抽样,我们招募了 27 名健康的老年人(≥60 岁),他们并非已经习惯使用活动监测器的人群。
为了从参与者的角度评估可用性,我们使用系统可用性量表(SUS)和特定于研究的定性检查表。评估还包括年龄、最高学历、计算机熟练程度和对技术交互的亲和力。从研究人员的角度来看,可用性是通过定量数据管理标记和特定于研究的定性检查表来评估的。
在本研究中比较的监测器在可用性方面存在显著差异。然而,参与者的整体可用性评分相当。相反,从研究人员的角度来看,在数据管理和可用性方面存在着关键的差异,这在为未来的研究选择监测器时应予以考虑。