Suppr超能文献

商用活动监测器在老年人和研究人员中的可用性如何?对社区居住个体的横断面评估。

How is the usability of commercial activity monitors perceived by older adults and by researchers? A cross-sectional evaluation of community-living individuals.

机构信息

Research Group Psychosocial Epidemiology & Public Health, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases Site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany

Research Group Psychosocial Epidemiology & Public Health, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases Site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 2;12(11):e063135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063135.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Using commercial activity monitors may advance research with older adults. However, usability for the older population is not sufficiently established. This study aims at evaluating the usability of three wrist-worn monitors for older adults. In addition, we report on usability (including data management) for research.

DESIGN

Data were collected cross-sectionally. Between-person of three activity monitor type (Apple Watch 3, Fitbit Charge 4, Polar A370) were made.

SETTING

The activity monitors were worn in normal daily life in an urban community in Germany. The period of wear was 2 weeks.

PARTICIPANTS

Using convenience sampling, we recruited N=27 healthy older adults (≥60 years old) who were not already habitual users of activity monitors.

OUTCOMES

To evaluate usability from the participant perspective, we used the System Usability Scale (SUS) as well as a study-specific qualitative checklist. Assessment further comprised age, highest academic degree, computer proficiency and affinity for technology interaction. Usability from the researchers' perspective was assessed using quantitative data management markers and a study-specific qualitative check-list.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between monitors in the SUS. Female gender was associated with higher SUS usability ratings. Qualitative participant-usability reports revealed distinctive shortcomings, for example, in terms of battery life and display readability. Usability for researchers came with problems in data management, such as completeness of the data download.

CONCLUSION

The usability of the monitors compared in this work differed qualitatively. Yet, the overall usability ratings by participants were comparable. Conversely, from the researchers' perspective, there were crucial differences in data management and usability that should be considered when making monitor choices for future studies.

摘要

目的

使用商业活动监测器可以促进老年人的研究。然而,其在老年人群中的可用性尚未得到充分证实。本研究旨在评估三种腕戴式监测器在老年人中的可用性。此外,我们还报告了研究中可用性(包括数据管理)的情况。

设计

数据是跨时段收集的。在个体间对三种活动监测器类型(Apple Watch 3、Fitbit Charge 4、Polar A370)进行了比较。

设置

活动监测器在德国城市社区的日常生活中正常佩戴。佩戴时间为 2 周。

参与者

使用便利抽样,我们招募了 27 名健康的老年人(≥60 岁),他们并非已经习惯使用活动监测器的人群。

结果

为了从参与者的角度评估可用性,我们使用系统可用性量表(SUS)和特定于研究的定性检查表。评估还包括年龄、最高学历、计算机熟练程度和对技术交互的亲和力。从研究人员的角度来看,可用性是通过定量数据管理标记和特定于研究的定性检查表来评估的。

结论

在本研究中比较的监测器在可用性方面存在显著差异。然而,参与者的整体可用性评分相当。相反,从研究人员的角度来看,在数据管理和可用性方面存在着关键的差异,这在为未来的研究选择监测器时应予以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9d3/9639094/38dd24fd9b1f/bmjopen-2022-063135f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验