Hergenroeder Andrea L, Barone Gibbs Bethany, Kotlarczyk Mary P, Perera Subashan, Kowalsky Robert J, Brach Jennifer S
J Aging Phys Act. 2019 Apr 1;27(2):222-229. doi: 10.1123/japa.2018-0036. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
The aim of this study was to evaluate accuracy of seven commercial activity monitors in measuring steps in older adults with varying walking abilities and to assess monitor acceptability and usability. Forty-three participants (age = 87 ± 5.7 years) completed a gait speed assessment, two walking trials while wearing the activity monitors, and questionnaires about usability features and activity monitor preferences. The Accusplit AX2710 Accelerometer Pedometer had the highest accuracy (93.68% ± 13.95%), whereas the Fitbit Charge had the lowest (39.12% ± 40.3%). Device accuracy varied based on assistive device use, and none of the monitors were accurate at gait speeds <0.08 m/s. Barriers to monitor usability included inability to apply monitor and access the step display. Monitor accuracy was rated as the most important feature, and ability to interface with a smart device was the least important feature. This study identified the limitations of the current commercial activity monitors in both step counting accuracy and usability features for older adults.
本研究的目的是评估七款商用活动监测器在测量不同步行能力的老年人步数方面的准确性,并评估监测器的可接受性和可用性。43名参与者(年龄=87±5.7岁)完成了步态速度评估,在佩戴活动监测器的情况下进行了两次步行试验,并填写了关于可用性特征和活动监测器偏好的问卷。Accusplit AX2710加速度计计步器的准确性最高(93.68%±13.95%),而Fitbit Charge的准确性最低(39.12%±40.3%)。设备准确性因辅助设备的使用而异,在步态速度<0.08米/秒时,没有一款监测器是准确的。监测器可用性的障碍包括无法佩戴监测器和查看步数显示。监测器准确性被评为最重要的特征,与智能设备连接的能力被评为最不重要的特征。本研究确定了当前商用活动监测器在老年人步数计数准确性和可用性特征方面的局限性。