• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用脑结构协方差网络识别重度抑郁症亚组并绘制相关临床和认知变量图谱

Identifying Subgroups of Major Depressive Disorder Using Brain Structural Covariance Networks and Mapping of Associated Clinical and Cognitive Variables.

作者信息

Yang Xiao, Kumar Poornima, Nickerson Lisa D, Du Yue, Wang Min, Chen Yayun, Li Tao, Pizzagalli Diego A, Ma Xiaohong

机构信息

Psychiatric Laboratory and Mental Health Center, the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Huaxi Brain Research Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2021 May 4;1(2):135-145. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.04.006. eCollection 2021 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.04.006
PMID:36324992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9616319/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying data-driven subtypes of major depressive disorder (MDD) holds promise for parsing the heterogeneity of MDD in a neurobiologically informed way. However, limited studies have used brain structural covariance networks (SCNs) for subtyping MDD.

METHODS

This study included 145 unmedicated patients with MDD and 206 demographically matched healthy control subjects, who underwent a structural magnetic resonance imaging scan and a comprehensive neurocognitive battery. Patterns of structural covariance were identified using source-based morphometry across both patients with MDD and healthy control subjects. K-means clustering algorithms were applied on dysregulated structural networks in MDD to identify potential MDD subtypes. Finally, clinical and neurocognitive measures were compared between identified subgroups to elucidate the profile of these MDD subtypes.

RESULTS

Source-based morphometry across all individuals identified 28 whole-brain SCNs that encompassed the prefrontal, anterior cingulate, and orbitofrontal cortices; basal ganglia; and cerebellar, visual, and motor regions. Compared with healthy control subjects, individuals with MDD showed lower structural network integrity in three networks including default mode, ventromedial prefrontal cortical, and salience networks. Clustering analysis revealed two MDD subtypes based on the patterns of structural network abnormalities in these three networks. Further profiling revealed that patients in subtype 1 had younger age of onset and more symptom severity as well as greater deficits in cognitive performance than patients in subtype 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, we identified two MDD subtypes based on SCNs that differed in their clinical and cognitive profile. Our results represent a proof-of-concept framework for leveraging these large-scale SCNs to parse heterogeneity in MDD.

摘要

背景

识别基于数据驱动的重度抑郁症(MDD)亚型有望以神经生物学知识为依据剖析MDD的异质性。然而,使用脑结构协方差网络(SCNs)对MDD进行亚型分类的研究有限。

方法

本研究纳入了145名未服药的MDD患者和206名人口统计学匹配的健康对照者,他们接受了结构磁共振成像扫描和全面的神经认知测试。使用基于源的形态测量法确定MDD患者和健康对照者的结构协方差模式。将K均值聚类算法应用于MDD中失调的结构网络,以识别潜在的MDD亚型。最后,比较已识别亚组之间的临床和神经认知指标,以阐明这些MDD亚型的特征。

结果

对所有个体进行基于源的形态测量法,识别出28个全脑SCNs,包括前额叶、前扣带回和眶额叶皮质;基底神经节;以及小脑、视觉和运动区域。与健康对照者相比,MDD患者在包括默认模式、腹内侧前额叶皮质和突显网络在内的三个网络中结构网络完整性较低。聚类分析基于这三个网络中的结构网络异常模式揭示了两种MDD亚型。进一步分析显示,与2型亚型患者相比,1型亚型患者发病年龄更小、症状更严重,认知表现缺陷也更大。

结论

总体而言,我们基于SCNs识别出两种MDD亚型,它们在临床和认知特征上存在差异。我们的结果代表了一个概念验证框架,用于利用这些大规模SCNs剖析MDD的异质性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6977/9616319/0d637a6b00dd/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6977/9616319/cd5fe4ff93e7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6977/9616319/94a23df3eb1c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6977/9616319/0d637a6b00dd/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6977/9616319/cd5fe4ff93e7/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6977/9616319/94a23df3eb1c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6977/9616319/0d637a6b00dd/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying Subgroups of Major Depressive Disorder Using Brain Structural Covariance Networks and Mapping of Associated Clinical and Cognitive Variables.利用脑结构协方差网络识别重度抑郁症亚组并绘制相关临床和认知变量图谱
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2021 May 4;1(2):135-145. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.04.006. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Biotypes of major depressive disorder: Neuroimaging evidence from resting-state default mode network patterns.重性抑郁障碍的生物类型:静息态默认模式网络模式的神经影像学证据。
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102514. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102514. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
3
Biotypes of major depressive disorder identified by a multiview clustering framework.通过多视角聚类框架识别的重度抑郁症生物型。
J Affect Disord. 2023 May 15;329:257-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.118. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
4
Widespread reductions in gray matter volume in depression.抑郁症患者大脑灰质体积普遍减少。
Neuroimage Clin. 2013 Sep 6;3:332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.08.016. eCollection 2013.
5
Coordinate-Based Network Mapping of Brain Structure in Major Depressive Disorder in Younger and Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于坐标的年轻人和老年人重度抑郁症大脑结构的网络图谱绘制:系统综述和荟萃分析。
Am J Psychiatry. 2021 Dec;178(12):1119-1128. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.21010088. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
6
Structural covariance pattern abnormalities of insula in major depressive disorder: A CAN-BIND study report.重度抑郁症患者脑岛结构协变模式异常:CAN-BIND 研究报告。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 20;111:110194. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110194. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
7
Multimodal Investigation of Network Level Effects Using Intrinsic Functional Connectivity, Anatomical Covariance, and Structure-to-Function Correlations in Unmedicated Major Depressive Disorder.未用药治疗的重度抑郁症患者的功能连接、解剖协变和结构-功能相关性的多模态网络水平效应研究。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Apr;43(5):1119-1127. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.229. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
8
Common and distinct structural network abnormalities in major depressive disorder and borderline personality disorder.重度抑郁症和边缘型人格障碍中常见和独特的结构网络异常。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Feb 4;65:127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
9
Altered Structural Covariance Among the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Amygdala in Treatment-Naïve Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.未经治疗的重度抑郁症患者背外侧前额叶皮质与杏仁核之间结构协方差的改变
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 20;9:323. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00323. eCollection 2018.
10
Transcriptional Patterns of Brain Structural Covariance Network Abnormalities Associated With Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors in Major Depressive Disorder.与重度抑郁症患者自杀意念和行为相关的脑结构协变网络异常的转录模式。
Biol Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 15;96(6):435-444. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.01.026. Epub 2024 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive heterogeneity in major depressive disorder: classification by IQ trajectory and multimodal neuroimaging profiles.重度抑郁症中的认知异质性:根据智商轨迹和多模态神经影像特征进行分类
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 1;25(1):754. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07221-4.
2
Predicting treatment response in individuals with major depressive disorder using structural MRI-based similarity features.利用基于结构磁共振成像的相似性特征预测重度抑郁症患者的治疗反应。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 26;25(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06945-7.
3
Abnormal structural covariance network in major depressive disorder: Evidence from the REST-meta-MDD project.

本文引用的文献

1
Reward Processing in Novelty Seekers: A Transdiagnostic Psychiatric Imaging Biomarker.新奇寻求者的奖励加工:一种跨诊断精神影像学生物标志物。
Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 15;90(8):529-539. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
2
A Mutual Multi-Scale Triplet Graph Convolutional Network for Classification of Brain Disorders Using Functional or Structural Connectivity.基于功能或结构连接的脑疾病分类的互多尺度三重图卷积网络。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2021 Apr;40(4):1279-1289. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3051604. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
3
Brain structural network alterations related to serum cortisol levels in drug-naïve, first-episode major depressive disorder patients: a source-based morphometric study.
重度抑郁症中的异常结构协方差网络:来自REST-meta-MDD项目的证据。
Neuroimage Clin. 2025;46:103794. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103794. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
4
Higher amplitudes of visual networks are associated with trait- but not state-depression.视觉网络的较高振幅与特质性抑郁而非状态性抑郁相关。
Psychol Med. 2025 Jan 6;54(16):1-12. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724003167.
5
Relationship of prefrontal cortex activity with anhedonia and cognitive function in major depressive disorder: an fNIRS study.前额叶皮层活动与重度抑郁症中快感缺乏及认知功能的关系:一项功能近红外光谱研究
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 19;15:1428425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1428425. eCollection 2024.
6
An MRI-based morphometric and structural covariance network study of Brazilian adolescents stratified by depression risk.一项基于磁共振成像的形态测量和结构协方差网络研究,对巴西青少年按抑郁风险进行分层。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2023 May 27;45(4):318-26. doi: 10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3037.
药物初治首发重性抑郁障碍患者血清皮质醇水平与脑结构网络改变的关系:基于体素的形态测量学研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 16;10(1):22096. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79220-2.
4
Source-based morphometry: a decade of covarying structural brain patterns.基于体素的形态计量学:十年的结构脑模式协变研究。
Brain Struct Funct. 2019 Dec;224(9):3031-3044. doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-01969-8. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
5
Data-driven biological subtypes of depression: systematic review of biological approaches to depression subtyping.基于数据驱动的抑郁症生物学亚型:抑郁症亚型生物学方法的系统评价。
Mol Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;24(6):888-900. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0385-5. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
6
Aberrant Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity and Graph Properties in Major Depressive Disorder.重度抑郁症中异常的动态功能网络连接性和图属性
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 31;9:339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00339. eCollection 2018.
7
MicroRNA132 associated multimodal neuroimaging patterns in unmedicated major depressive disorder.未用药重性抑郁障碍中与 microRNA132 相关的多模态神经影像学模式。
Brain. 2018 Mar 1;141(3):916-926. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx366.
8
Multimodal Investigation of Network Level Effects Using Intrinsic Functional Connectivity, Anatomical Covariance, and Structure-to-Function Correlations in Unmedicated Major Depressive Disorder.未用药治疗的重度抑郁症患者的功能连接、解剖协变和结构-功能相关性的多模态网络水平效应研究。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Apr;43(5):1119-1127. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.229. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
9
Erratum: Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression.勘误:静息态连接生物标志物定义抑郁症的神经生理亚型。
Nat Med. 2017 Feb 7;23(2):264. doi: 10.1038/nm0217-264d.
10
Neural correlates of rumination in adolescents with remitted major depressive disorder and healthy controls.缓解期重度抑郁症青少年及健康对照者反刍思维的神经关联
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Apr;17(2):394-405. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0486-4.