University of Alberta, Canada.
J Child Lang. 2024 Mar;51(2):454-469. doi: 10.1017/S0305000922000411. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
Typically-developing bilingual children often score lower than monolingual peers of the same age on standardized measures; however, research has shown that when assessed in more natural discourse contexts, bilinguals can perform similar to age-matched monolinguals in some language subdomains. This study investigated complex syntax production in simultaneous French-English bilingual children and monolingual age-matched peers, using structured and spontaneous measures. Surprisingly, the bilinguals scored higher than the monolinguals on the structured task. There was no difference between groups on the spontaneous measure; however, predictors of complex syntax production differed by language groups and by tasks. Contrary to other language subdomains showing bilingual English development as protracted relative to monolingual peers, these results point to a relative strength of complex syntax acquisition among simultaneous bilingual children. Differences in exposure relative to monolingual children may be less pronounced in syntax, in part because bilinguals can benefit from syntactic knowledge in their other language.
典型发展的双语儿童在标准化测试中的得分通常低于同年龄的单语儿童;然而,研究表明,当在更自然的话语语境中进行评估时,双语者在某些语言子领域的表现可以与年龄匹配的单语者相似。本研究使用结构和自然的测量方法,调查了同时学习法语和英语的双语儿童和单语年龄匹配同伴的复杂句法产生。令人惊讶的是,双语者在结构任务上的得分高于单语者。在自然测量中,两组之间没有差异;然而,复杂句法产生的预测因素因语言群体和任务而异。与其他语言子领域相比,双语英语发展相对于单语同伴更为缓慢,这些结果表明,同时学习两种语言的儿童在复杂句法习得方面具有相对优势。与单语儿童相比,接触语言的差异在句法方面可能不那么明显,部分原因是双语者可以从他们的另一种语言中的句法知识中受益。