• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

造口关闭术中减少手术部位感染的综合措施:一项回顾性队列研究。

Surgical site infection reduction bundle in stoma closure: A retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Goto Kentaro, Matsusue Ryo, Degawa Kanako, Miki Akimori, Nakanishi Hiroki, Hata Hiroaki, Narita Masato, Yamaguchi Takashi

机构信息

Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organisation Kyoto Medical Centre, Kyoto, Japan.

Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Pract Sci. 2025 Feb 22;20:100277. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100277. eCollection 2025 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100277
PMID:40104439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11914828/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Advances in minimally invasive surgeries and pre-operative treatments allow the preservation of anal function through lower anastomosis in patients with rectal cancer, often necessitating temporary diverting stomas owing to the risk of anastomotic leakage. Stoma closure is associated with a high rate of surgical site infections (SSIs). Various measures, including purse-string skin sutures and negative-pressure wound therapy, have been implemented, and some guidelines recommend purse-string skin sutures as the standard method of stoma closure. However, at our institution, we used linear skin closure with an SSI reduction bundle. This study describes our stoma closure method and retrospectively analyses surgical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients aged ≥ 20 years who underwent loop stoma closure using linear skin sutures at our institution between January 2006 and March 2021. Our protocol emphasises the following: (1) pre-operative oral anti-microbials, (2) a surgical technique that distinctly separates clean and contaminated regions, and (3) wound closure to eliminate dead space. We evaluated the surgical outcomes, including the incidence of SSIs and other post-operative complications.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients (53 men, 39 women; mean age, 59.4 years) underwent loop stoma closure. SSIs occurred in two patients (2.2%). No risk factors for SSIs were identified.

CONCLUSION

In our department, the incidence of SSIs after linear skin closure of stomas was low. Adherence to proper infection prevention practices can effectively mitigate SSIs, even with linear skin closure.

摘要

引言

微创外科手术和术前治疗的进展使得直肠癌患者能够通过低位吻合术保留肛门功能,但由于吻合口漏的风险,通常需要临时造口转流。造口关闭与手术部位感染(SSI)的高发生率相关。已经采取了各种措施,包括荷包皮肤缝合和负压伤口治疗,一些指南推荐荷包皮肤缝合作为造口关闭的标准方法。然而,在我们机构,我们采用了带有SSI减少束的线性皮肤缝合。本研究描述了我们的造口关闭方法,并回顾性分析了手术结果。

材料与方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2006年1月至2021年3月期间在我们机构接受线性皮肤缝合进行袢式造口关闭的年龄≥20岁的患者。我们的方案强调以下几点:(1)术前口服抗菌药物,(2)一种能明显区分清洁和污染区域的手术技术,(3)伤口缝合以消除死腔。我们评估了手术结果,包括SSI的发生率和其他术后并发症。

结果

92例患者(53例男性,39例女性;平均年龄59.4岁)接受了袢式造口关闭。2例患者(2.2%)发生了SSI。未发现SSI的危险因素。

结论

在我们科室,造口线性皮肤缝合术后SSI的发生率较低。即使采用线性皮肤缝合,坚持适当的感染预防措施也能有效减轻SSI。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b1/11914828/7b0c56e14da8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b1/11914828/7b0c56e14da8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b1/11914828/7b0c56e14da8/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Surgical site infection reduction bundle in stoma closure: A retrospective cohort study.造口关闭术中减少手术部位感染的综合措施:一项回顾性队列研究。
Surg Pract Sci. 2025 Feb 22;20:100277. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100277. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure in people undergoing stoma reversal.造口回纳术患者荷包式皮肤缝合与直线式皮肤缝合的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 12;3(3):CD014763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014763.pub2.
3
A comparison of surgical site infections in children after stoma reversal between purse-string and linear closure.荷包缝合与线性缝合在儿童造口还纳术后手术部位感染的比较。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Jan;38(1):149-156. doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-05011-z. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
4
A prospective study of 'circumferential purse-string approximation' vs. primary linear skin closure in stoma reversal.前瞻性研究“环形荷包缝合”与造口反转中的原发性线性皮肤缝合的比较。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Aug 17;42:287. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.42.287.29213. eCollection 2022.
5
Comparing Surgical Site Infection and Scar Cosmesis Between Conventional Linear Skin Closure Versus Purse-string Skin Closure in Stoma Reversal - A Randomized Controlled Trial.造口回纳术中传统线性皮肤缝合与荷包式皮肤缝合的手术部位感染及瘢痕美观度比较——一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2018 Feb 11;10(2):e2181. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2181.
6
Surgical Site Infection After Stoma Reversal: A Comparison Between Linear and Purse-String Closure.造口回纳术后手术部位感染:直线缝合与荷包缝合的比较
Cureus. 2023 Dec 6;15(12):e50057. doi: 10.7759/cureus.50057. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Wound infection following stoma takedown: primary skin closure versus subcuticular purse-string suture.肠造口还纳术后的伤口感染:一期缝合与皮下连续缝合比较。
World J Surg. 2010 Dec;34(12):2877-82. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0753-4.
8
[Application of modified purse-string closure in the wound following loop stoma reversal].改良荷包缝合在袢式造口回纳术后伤口的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 25;21(12):1403-1407.
9
Risk factors for surgical site infections and trends in skin closure technique after diverting loop ileostomy reversal: A multi-institutional analysis.预防性回肠造口还纳术后手术部位感染的危险因素及皮肤缝合技术的变化趋势:多中心分析。
Am J Surg. 2023 Nov;226(5):703-708. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.07.042. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
10
The Outcome of Purse-string Versus Conventional Wound Closure Techniques in Patients Undergoing Stoma Reversal: A Randomized Controlled Trial.经肛门内镜微创手术治疗直肠阴道瘘的临床疗效
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Jun;59(6):1186-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.10.062. Epub 2023 Oct 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Routine sterile glove and instrument change at the time of abdominal wound closure to prevent surgical site infection (ChEETAh): a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial in seven low-income and middle-income countries.腹部伤口缝合时常规更换无菌手套和器械以预防手术部位感染(ChEETAh):在七个低收入和中等收入国家进行的一项实用、整群随机试验
Lancet. 2022 Nov 19;400(10365):1767-1776. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01884-0. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
2
Outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: propensity-matched analysis of the National Clinical Database in Japan.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜低位前切除术治疗直肠癌患者的结局比较:来自日本国家临床数据库的倾向性匹配分析。
BJS Open. 2021 Sep 6;5(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab083.
3
A protocol for skin closure after stoma reversal.造口回纳术后皮肤闭合方案。
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Mar;24(3):255-257. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-02033-7. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
4
Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure techniques in stoma closure: a comprehensive meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomised trials.造口关闭术中荷包缝合皮肤与线性缝合皮肤技术的比较:一项随机试验的综合荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Oct;33(10):1319-1332. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3139-y. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
5
American College of Surgeons and Surgical Infection Society: Surgical Site Infection Guidelines, 2016 Update.美国外科医师学会和外科感染学会:《手术部位感染指南,2016年更新》
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Jan;224(1):59-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.10.029. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
6
Randomized Controlled Trial of Prophylactic Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy at Ostomy Closure for the Prevention of Delayed Wound Healing and Surgical Site Infection in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.预防性负压伤口治疗在溃疡性结肠炎患者造口闭合术中预防伤口愈合延迟和手术部位感染的随机对照试验
Dig Surg. 2016;33(6):449-54. doi: 10.1159/000446550. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
7
Oral and Parenteral Versus Parenteral Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (JMTO PREV 07-01): A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Trial.择期腹腔镜结直肠手术中口服及肠外联合与单纯肠外抗生素预防治疗(JMTO PREV 07 - 01):一项3期、多中心、开放标签的随机试验
Ann Surg. 2016 Jun;263(6):1085-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001581.
8
Gut microbiota in health and disease.肠道微生物群与健康和疾病。
Physiol Rev. 2010 Jul;90(3):859-904. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00045.2009.
9
Stoma closure and wound infection: an evaluation of risk factors.造口关闭与伤口感染:危险因素评估
Can J Surg. 1995 Apr;38(2):144-8.