• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Prof. Karin Hannes: COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies).

作者信息

Du Kathy J, Li Grace S, Zhang Kaiping, Lin Yao, Yang Fanghui, Hannes Karin

机构信息

ATM Editorial Office, AME Publishing Company.

Social Research Methodology Group, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2022 Oct;10(19):1073. doi: 10.21037/atm-2022-23.

DOI:10.21037/atm-2022-23
PMID:36330400
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9622469/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35d2/9622469/b3681e459a25/atm-10-19-1073-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35d2/9622469/b3681e459a25/atm-10-19-1073-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35d2/9622469/b3681e459a25/atm-10-19-1073-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Prof. Karin Hannes: COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies).卡琳·汉内斯教授：《定性研究报告的统一标准》（COREQ）
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Oct;10(19):1073. doi: 10.21037/atm-2022-23.
2
The quality of quality criteria: Replicating the development of the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).质量标准的质量：复制定性研究报告的统一标准 (COREQ) 的发展。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Feb;102:103452. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103452. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
3
Completeness of reporting in Indian qualitative public health research: a systematic review of 20 years of literature.印度定性公共卫生研究报告的完整性：对 20 年文献的系统回顾。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Jun 1;41(2):405-411. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy122.
4
[Introduction to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research].[定性研究报告的统一标准介绍]
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2008 Feb;6(2):115-8. doi: 10.3736/jcim20080202.
5
Reporting Qualitative Research: Standards, Challenges, and Implications for Health Design.定性研究报告：标准、挑战及对健康设计的启示
HERD. 2018 Apr;11(2):16-19. doi: 10.1177/1937586718772615. Epub 2018 May 9.
6
Gender in the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist.定性研究报告统一标准（COREQ）清单中的性别因素。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Oct 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab123.
7
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.定性研究报告的统一标准（COREQ）：访谈和焦点小组的32项清单
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
8
How well are dental qualitative studies involving interviews and focus groups reported?涉及访谈和焦点小组的口腔定性研究报告得如何？
J Dent. 2019 May;84:44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
9
Qualitative studies conducted alongside randomized controlled trials in oncology: A scoping review of use and rigour of reporting.肿瘤学中随机对照试验伴随的定性研究：报告使用和严谨性的范围综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Apr;128:104174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104174. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
10
Benefits of the Cybathlon 2020 experience for a prosthetic hand user: a case study on the Hannes system.2020 年 Cybathlon 体验对假肢使用者的益处：以 Hannes 系统为例的案例研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Jul 4;19(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01046-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the spiritual experiences of older adults with chronic diseases: a qualitative study in a multicultural context.探索患有慢性病的老年人的精神体验：一项多元文化背景下的定性研究。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):632. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02710-3.
2
Patient-Nurse Communication in an Oncology Hospital Setting: A Qualitative Study.肿瘤医院环境中的医患沟通：一项定性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Dec 30;13(1):50. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13010050.
3
Nurses' perceptions of leadership in Brazilian hospitals during COVID-19 through Kotter's conception.
护士对 COVID-19 期间巴西医院领导力的看法——基于科特的理念。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024 Aug 19;32:e4281. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.7151.4281. eCollection 2024.
4
Primary care physicians' experiences of video and online chat consultations: a qualitative descriptive study.基层医疗医生对视频和在线聊天咨询的体验：一项质性描述性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Mar;43(1):47-58. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2391406. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
5
Patient-Led Research to Develop a Training Programme for Restoring Musical Joy in Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Reflexive Process Evaluation.患者主导的研究，旨在为人工耳蜗植入者开发一项恢复音乐愉悦感的培训计划：反思性过程评估。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14133. doi: 10.1111/hex.14133.
6
Content analysis of succession planning in nursing management: a qualitative study.护理管理中继任计划的内容分析：一项定性研究。
BMJ Lead. 2025 Mar 24;9(1):22-30. doi: 10.1136/leader-2024-000973.
7
Family caregiver experience of caring COVID-19 patients admitted in COVID-19 hospital of a tertiary care hospital in Nepal.尼泊尔一家三级护理医院的 COVID-19 病房中 COVID-19 患者的家庭护理人员的体验。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 5;19(1):e0295395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295395. eCollection 2024.
8
Perceived Consequences of COVID-19 Restrictive Visitation Policy on Family Members at Rural Hospitals in Vhembe District: A Qualitative Study.新冠肺炎疫情限制探视政策对韦姆贝区农村医院家庭成员的感知影响：一项定性研究
Nurs Rep. 2023 Oct 7;13(4):1399-1409. doi: 10.3390/nursrep13040117.
9
A qualitative analysis of the nurturing care environment of families participating in Brazil's Criança Feliz early childhood program.巴西“快乐童年”早期儿童发展计划家庭养育环境的定性分析
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 19;18(7):e0288940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288940. eCollection 2023.
10
Medical staff's perception of factors contributing to accelerated rehabilitation in patients with cervical spinal cord injury: A qualitative research.医务人员对促进颈椎脊髓损伤患者加速康复因素的认知：一项定性研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jul;10(7):4664-4675. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1715. Epub 2023 Mar 6.