• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 O-RADS 超声词汇的逻辑回归分析模型在含实性成分卵巢恶性肿瘤诊断中的应用。

Application of O-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon-Based Logistic Regression Analysis Model in the Diagnosis of Solid Component-Containing Ovarian Malignancies.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, South Medical University Affiliated Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China.

Department of Pathology, South Medical University Affiliated Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2022 Oct 25;2022:7187334. doi: 10.1155/2022/7187334. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/7187334
PMID:36330455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9626203/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To use the logistic regression model to evaluate the value of ultrasound characteristics in the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System ultrasound lexicon in determining ovarian solid component-containing mass benignancy/malignancy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 172 patients with adnexal masses discovered by ultrasound, and diagnosis was confirmed by postoperative pathological tests from January 2019 to December 2021. Thirteen ovarian tumor-related parameters in the benign and malignant ovarian tumor groups were selected for univariate analyses. Statistically significant parameters were included in multivariate logistic regression analyses to construct a logistic regression diagnosis model, and the diagnostic performance of the model in predicting ovarian malignancies was calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 172 adnexal tumors, 104 were benign, and 68 were malignant. There were differences in cancer antigen 125, maximum mass diameter, maximum solid component diameter, multilocular cyst with solid component, external contour, whether acoustic shadows were present in the solid component, number of papillae, vascularity, presence/absence of ascites, and presence/absence of peritoneal thickening or nodules between the benign ovarian tumor and malignancy groups ( < 0.05). Logistic regression analyses showed that maximum solid component diameter, whether acoustic shadows were present in the solid component, number of papillae, and presence/absence of ascites were included in the logistic regression model, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for this regression model in predicting ovarian malignancy was 0.962 (95% confidence interval: 0.933~0.990; < 0.001). Logit () ≥ -0.02 was used as the cutoff value, and the prediction accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were 93.6%, 86.8%, 98.1%, 96.7%, and 91.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The logistic regression model containing the maximum solid component diameter, whether acoustic shadows were present in the solid component, number of papillae, and presence/absence of ascites can help in determining the benignancy/malignancy of solid component-containing masses.

摘要

目的

利用 logistic 回归模型评估卵巢-附件报告和数据系统超声术语中的超声特征在确定含有卵巢实性成分的肿块良性/恶性中的价值。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间经超声发现附件肿块的 172 例患者的数据,诊断结果经术后病理检查证实。对良性和恶性卵巢肿瘤组中 13 个与卵巢肿瘤相关的参数进行单因素分析。将有统计学意义的参数纳入多变量 logistic 回归分析,构建 logistic 回归诊断模型,并计算模型预测卵巢恶性肿瘤的诊断性能。

结果

172 个附件肿瘤中,良性 104 例,恶性 68 例。良性卵巢肿瘤组与恶性卵巢肿瘤组在癌抗原 125、最大肿块直径、最大实性成分直径、多房性伴实性成分的囊肿、外形、实性成分中是否存在声影、乳头数量、血流、腹水、腹腔增厚或结节的存在/缺失方面存在差异(<0.05)。logistic 回归分析显示,最大实性成分直径、实性成分中是否存在声影、乳头数量和腹水的存在被纳入 logistic 回归模型,该回归模型预测卵巢恶性肿瘤的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.962(95%置信区间:0.933~0.990;<0.001)。以 logit()≥-0.02 为截断值,该回归模型的预测准确率、敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 93.6%、86.8%、98.1%、96.7%和 91.9%。

结论

包含最大实性成分直径、实性成分中是否存在声影、乳头数量和腹水存在的 logistic 回归模型有助于确定含有实性成分的肿块的良恶性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9626203/744b5b6139be/BMRI2022-7187334.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9626203/b0290735c53a/BMRI2022-7187334.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9626203/fbbe18743ae7/BMRI2022-7187334.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9626203/700c3da78cf6/BMRI2022-7187334.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9626203/40630cdec112/BMRI2022-7187334.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9626203/1d159f4713c5/BMRI2022-7187334.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9626203/744b5b6139be/BMRI2022-7187334.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9626203/b0290735c53a/BMRI2022-7187334.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9626203/fbbe18743ae7/BMRI2022-7187334.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9626203/700c3da78cf6/BMRI2022-7187334.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9626203/40630cdec112/BMRI2022-7187334.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9626203/1d159f4713c5/BMRI2022-7187334.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e698/9626203/744b5b6139be/BMRI2022-7187334.006.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of O-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon-Based Logistic Regression Analysis Model in the Diagnosis of Solid Component-Containing Ovarian Malignancies.基于 O-RADS 超声词汇的逻辑回归分析模型在含实性成分卵巢恶性肿瘤诊断中的应用。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Oct 25;2022:7187334. doi: 10.1155/2022/7187334. eCollection 2022.
2
Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.附件肿块使用灰阶和多普勒超声检查结果的主观评估难以明确良恶性:逻辑回归模型无助于诊断。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):456-65. doi: 10.1002/uog.9030. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
3
Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.基于国际卵巢肿瘤分析小组的简单规则预测附件包块的恶性风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):424-437. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
4
Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group.术前区分附件包块良恶性的逻辑回归模型:国际卵巢肿瘤分析组的多中心研究
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8794-801. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.7632.
5
Evaluation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System ultrasound to predict malignancy risk in adnexal lesions.评价美国放射学会卵巢-附件报告和数据系统超声在附件病变恶性风险预测中的作用。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Feb;50(2):225-232. doi: 10.1111/jog.15831. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
6
Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.基于超声的卵巢癌诊断简易规则。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;31(6):681-90. doi: 10.1002/uog.5365.
7
External Validation of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) Lexicon and the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis 2-Step Strategy to Stratify Ovarian Tumors Into O-RADS Risk Groups.卵巢-附件报告和数据系统 (O-RADS) 词汇表以及国际卵巢肿瘤分析两步策略的外部验证,以将卵巢肿瘤分层为 O-RADS 风险组。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Feb 1;9(2):225-233. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5969.
8
Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.IOTA 简单规则、O-RADS 和 CA125 对鉴别附件区良恶性肿块的效能。
J Ovarian Res. 2022 Jan 23;15(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13048-022-00947-9.
9
How to improve O-RADS MRI score for rating adnexal masses with cystic component?如何提高 O-RADS MRI 评分以评估具有囊性成分的附件肿块?
Eur Radiol. 2022 Sep;32(9):5943-5953. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08644-3. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
10
Validation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US): Analysis on 1054 adnexal masses.美国放射学院卵巢-附件报告和数据系统超声(O-RADS US)的验证:对 1054 个附件肿块的分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jul;162(1):107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.04.031. Epub 2021 May 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Ultrasound (O-RADS US): Analysis on 1054 adnexal masses.美国放射学院卵巢-附件报告和数据系统超声(O-RADS US)的验证:对 1054 个附件肿块的分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jul;162(1):107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.04.031. Epub 2021 May 7.
2
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses.
附件包块良恶性诊断中 O-RADS、GI-RADS 和 IOTA 简单规则的比较:恶性率、有效性和可靠性。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Feb;31(2):674-684. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07143-7. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
4
Solid Hypoechoic Adnexal Lesions with Acoustic Shadowing Warrant an MRI Recommendation in the O-RADS Risk Stratification and Management System.在O-RADS风险分层与管理系统中,伴有声影的实性低回声附件病变需要进行MRI检查。
Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):E11-E13. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200437. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
5
O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee.O-RADS US 风险分层与管理系统:ACR 卵巢-附件报告和数据系统委员会的共识指南。
Radiology. 2020 Jan;294(1):168-185. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191150. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
6
ACR Appropriateness Criteria Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass, No Acute Symptoms.美国放射学会适宜性标准:临床怀疑附件包块,无急性症状
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 May;16(5S):S77-S93. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.011.
7
Cancer statistics, 2019.癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Extended Bevacizumab Therapy in Elderly (≥70 Years) Versus Younger Patients Treated for Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer in the International ROSiA Study.国际 ROSiA 研究中,新诊断卵巢癌患者中,与年轻患者相比,高龄(≥70 岁)患者接受贝伐珠单抗延长治疗的安全性和疗效。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 May;28(4):729-737. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001221.
9
Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study.使用 ADNEX 模型评估术前卵巢癌风险,以区分良性、交界性、早期和晚期侵袭性以及继发性转移性肿瘤:前瞻性多中心诊断研究。
BMJ. 2014 Oct 15;349:g5920. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5920.
10
Gynecologic imaging reporting and data system: a new proposal for classifying adnexal masses on the basis of sonographic findings.妇科影像报告和数据系统:基于超声检查结果对附件包块进行分类的新提议。
J Ultrasound Med. 2009 Mar;28(3):285-91. doi: 10.7863/jum.2009.28.3.285.