Solante Rontgene, Alvarez-Moreno Carlos, Burhan Erlina, Chariyalertsak Suwat, Chiu Nan-Chang, Chuenkitmongkol Sunate, Dung D V, Hwang Kao-Pin, Ortiz Ibarra Javier, Kiertiburanakul Sasisopin, Kulkarni Prasad S, Lee Christopher, Lee Ping-Ing, Lobo Rommel Crisenio, Macias Alejandro, Nghia Cao Huu, Ong-Lim Anna Lisa, Rodriguez-Morales Alfonso J, Richtmann Rosana, Safadi Marco Aurélio Palazzi, Satari Hindra Irawan, Thwaites Guy
San Lazaro Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
Infectious Diseases Unit, Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Clinica Universitaria Colombia, Clínica Colsanitas, Colombia.
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2023 Jan-Dec;22(1):1-16. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2143347. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
COVID-19 vaccines have been highly effective in reducing morbidity and mortality during the pandemic. However, the emergence of the Omicron variant and subvariants as the globally dominant strains have raised doubts about the effectiveness of currently available vaccines and prompted debate about potential future vaccination strategies.
Using the publicly available IVAC VIEW-hub platform, we reviewed 52 studies on vaccine effectiveness (VE) after booster vaccinations. VE were reported for SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic infection, severe disease and death and stratified by vaccine schedule and age. In addition, a non-systematic literature review of safety was performed to identify single or multi-country studies investigating adverse event rates for at least two of the currently available COVID-19 vaccines.
Booster shots of the current COVID-19 vaccines provide consistently high protection against Omicron-related severe disease and death. Additionally, this protection appears to be conserved for at least 3 months, with a small but significant waning after that. The positive risk-benefit ratio of these vaccines is well established, giving us confidence to administer additional doses as required. Future vaccination strategies will likely include a combination of schedules based on risk profile, as overly frequent boosting may be neither beneficial nor sustainable for the general population.
在疫情期间,新冠疫苗在降低发病率和死亡率方面具有高度有效性。然而,奥密克戎变种及亚变种成为全球主要流行毒株,引发了人们对现有疫苗有效性的质疑,并促使人们对未来潜在的疫苗接种策略展开讨论。
我们利用公开可用的IVAC VIEW-hub平台,回顾了52项关于加强接种后疫苗有效性(VE)的研究。报告了针对新冠病毒有症状感染、重症疾病和死亡的疫苗有效性,并按疫苗接种程序和年龄进行了分层。此外,还进行了一项非系统性的安全性文献综述,以确定调查至少两种现有新冠疫苗不良事件发生率的单国或多国研究。
目前的新冠疫苗加强针能持续为预防奥密克戎相关的重症疾病和死亡提供高度保护。此外,这种保护作用似乎至少能维持3个月,之后虽有轻微但显著的减弱。这些疫苗良好的风险效益比已得到充分证实,使我们有信心根据需要接种额外剂量。未来的疫苗接种策略可能会包括根据风险状况制定的不同接种程序组合,因为过于频繁的加强接种对普通人群可能既无益处也不可持续。