Suppr超能文献

玫瑰痤疮面积和严重程度指数的有效性和可靠性:一种用于评估玫瑰痤疮严重程度的新型临床评分系统。

Validity and reliability of the Rosacea Area and Severity Index: A novel scoring system for clinical assessment of rosacea severity.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Mar;37(3):573-580. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18721. Epub 2022 Nov 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rosacea is a common chronic inflammatory facial skin disorder. Standardized evaluation of the severity and extent of rosacea is important for baseline assessment and treatment effect. The currently used Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) is unspecific and fails to consider subtypes/phenotypes of rosacea and area involvement. The Rosacea Area and Severity Index (RASI) was developed to give a more nuanced evaluation of rosacea features in four facial skin areas adjusted to the relative importance of each area of the face to obtain an overall severity score.

OBJECTIVES

To validate RASI against the IGA and to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability for RASI.

METHODS

Sixteen dermatologists evaluated photographs of 60 adult patients with rosacea (3 photographs per patient, one from the front and one from each side). IGA and RASI scores were performed for interobserver reliability assessment. To determine intraobserver reliability, 14 dermatologists evaluated 10 other patients twice with at least 1 week interval.

RESULTS

The IGA and RASI correlated well (Spearman correlation coefficient (SCC) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.72-0.78). Interobserver reliability was moderate for RASI and poor to moderate for IGA. Reliability was strongest for rhinophyma, followed by papules/pustules and erythema, and rather weak for telangiectasia. For area scores, interobserver reliability was strongest for cheeks, followed by nose, chin and forehead. We found a moderate-to-strong intraobserver agreement both for IGA and RASI.

CONCLUSIONS

We have designed a new practical tool to examine clinical severity of rosacea. RASI proved simple and reliable in scoring clinical severity of rosacea with an agreement comparable to the currently used IGA although RASI will provide a more nuanced view of the current rosacea extent and severity. We suggest that RASI is used in the daily clinical setting as well as in clinical studies assessing the efficacy of rosacea therapies.

摘要

背景

酒渣鼻是一种常见的慢性炎症性面部皮肤疾病。对酒渣鼻的严重程度和范围进行标准化评估对于基线评估和治疗效果很重要。目前使用的研究者全球评估(IGA)不具体,并且未能考虑酒渣鼻的亚型/表型和区域受累。酒渣鼻面积和严重程度指数(RASI)的开发是为了更细致地评估四个面部皮肤区域的酒渣鼻特征,根据每个面部区域的相对重要性进行调整,以获得整体严重程度评分。

目的

验证 RASI 与 IGA 的一致性,并评估 RASI 的观察者间和观察者内可靠性。

方法

16 名皮肤科医生评估了 60 名成年酒渣鼻患者的照片(每位患者 3 张照片,正面和两侧各一张)。进行 IGA 和 RASI 评分以进行观察者间可靠性评估。为了确定观察者内的可靠性,14 名皮肤科医生在至少 1 周的间隔内两次评估了 10 名其他患者。

结果

IGA 和 RASI 相关性良好(Spearman 相关系数(SCC)= 0.75,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.72-0.78)。RASI 的观察者间可靠性为中度,IGA 的观察者间可靠性为差到中度。酒渣鼻鼻赘的可靠性最强,其次是丘疹/脓疱和红斑,而毛细血管扩张的可靠性较弱。对于区域评分,脸颊的观察者间可靠性最强,其次是鼻子、下巴和额头。我们发现 IGA 和 RASI 的观察者内一致性均为中度到强。

结论

我们设计了一种新的实用工具来检查酒渣鼻的临床严重程度。RASI 在评分酒渣鼻的临床严重程度方面既简单又可靠,其一致性与目前使用的 IGA 相当,尽管 RASI 将提供当前酒渣鼻范围和严重程度的更细致视图。我们建议在日常临床环境以及评估酒渣鼻治疗效果的临床研究中使用 RASI。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验