• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者在联邦国家级健康信息交换中的角色。

The Patient Role in a Federal National-Scale Health Information Exchange.

机构信息

Microsoft Healthcare, Redmond, WA, United States.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 4;24(11):e41750. doi: 10.2196/41750.

DOI:10.2196/41750
PMID:36331535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9662291/
Abstract

The federal Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA) aims to reduce fragmentation of patient records by expanding query-based health information exchange with nationwide connectivity for diverse purposes. TEFCA provides a common agreement and security framework allowing clinicians, and possibly insurance company staff, public health officials, and other authorized users, to query for health information about hundreds of millions of patients. TEFCA presents an opportunity to weave information exchange into the fabric of our national health information economy. We define 3 principles to promote patient autonomy and control within TEFCA: (1) patients can query for data about themselves, (2) patients can know when their data are queried and shared, and (3) patients can configure what is shared about them. We believe TEFCA should address these principles by the time it launches. While health information exchange already occurs on a large scale today, the launch of TEFCA introduces a major, new, and cohesive component of 21st-century US health care information infrastructure. We strongly advocate for a substantive role for the patient in TEFCA, one that will be a model for other systems and policies.

摘要

联邦可信交换框架和通用协议(TEFCA)旨在通过扩大基于查询的健康信息交换,实现全国范围内的连接,从而减少患者记录的碎片化。TEFCA 提供了一个通用协议和安全框架,允许临床医生、可能的保险公司员工、公共卫生官员和其他授权用户查询数亿患者的健康信息。TEFCA 为将信息交换编织到我们国家的健康信息经济结构中提供了机会。我们定义了 3 个原则来促进 TEFCA 中的患者自主权和控制:(1)患者可以查询自己的数据,(2)患者可以知道何时查询和共享他们的数据,以及(3)患者可以配置共享有关他们的信息。我们认为,TEFCA 在推出时应该解决这些原则。虽然今天已经大规模进行健康信息交换,但 TEFCA 的推出引入了 21 世纪美国医疗保健信息基础设施的一个主要的、新的和有凝聚力的组成部分。我们强烈主张在 TEFCA 中赋予患者实质性的角色,这将成为其他系统和政策的典范。

相似文献

1
The Patient Role in a Federal National-Scale Health Information Exchange.患者在联邦国家级健康信息交换中的角色。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 4;24(11):e41750. doi: 10.2196/41750.
2
Road to a National Health Information Network: US Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA).迈向国家健康信息网络之路:美国可信交换框架和通用协议 (TEFCA)。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Jul 24;315:697-698. doi: 10.3233/SHTI240285.
3
Promoting TEFCA with Blockchain Technology: A Decentralized Approach to Patient-centered Healthcare Data Management.利用区块链技术推动 TEFCA:以去中心化方式管理以患者为中心的医疗保健数据。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024 Jan 11;2023:824-833. eCollection 2023.
4
The state of health information organizations and plans to participate in the federal exchange framework.健康信息组织的状况以及参与联邦交换框架的计划。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Aug 21;2(8):qxae098. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae098. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Legal Barriers to the Growth of Health Information Exchange-Boulders or Pebbles?健康信息交换增长的法律障碍——巨石还是卵石?
Milbank Q. 2018 Mar;96(1):110-143. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12313.
6
Property rights and privacy principles.产权与隐私原则。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2000 Winter;14(4):83-93.
7
Privacy and security in Pennsylvania: ensuring privacy and security of health information exchange in Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚州的隐私与安全:确保宾夕法尼亚州健康信息交换的隐私与安全。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2009 Spring;23(2):38-44.
8
Cyber-Security Issues in Healthcare Information Technology.医疗信息技术中的网络安全问题
J Digit Imaging. 2017 Feb;30(1):117-125. doi: 10.1007/s10278-016-9913-x.
9
Toward Proper Authentication Methods in Electronic Medical Record Access Compliant to HIPAA and C.I.A. Triangle.符合 HIPAA 和 C.I.A. 三角要求的电子病历访问中的适当身份验证方法
J Med Syst. 2016 Apr;40(4):100. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0465-x. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
10
Review of HIPAA, Part 1: History, Protected Health Information, and Privacy and Security Rules.《健康保险流通与责任法案》(HIPAA)综述,第1部分:历史、受保护的健康信息以及隐私和安全规则。
J Nucl Med Technol. 2019 Dec;47(4):269-272. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.119.227819. Epub 2019 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Accelerating a learning public health system: Opportunities, obstacles, and a call to action.加速学习型公共卫生系统:机遇、障碍与行动呼吁。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Sep 30;8(4):e10449. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10449. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
A scoping review of rule-based clinical decision support malfunctions.基于规则的临床决策支持故障的范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Oct 1;31(10):2405-2413. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae187.
3
Biases in Electronic Health Records Data for Generating Real-World Evidence: An Overview.用于生成真实世界证据的电子健康记录数据中的偏差:概述
J Healthc Inform Res. 2023 Nov 14;8(1):121-139. doi: 10.1007/s41666-023-00153-2. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Promoting TEFCA with Blockchain Technology: A Decentralized Approach to Patient-centered Healthcare Data Management.利用区块链技术推动 TEFCA:以去中心化方式管理以患者为中心的医疗保健数据。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024 Jan 11;2023:824-833. eCollection 2023.
5
Artificial Intelligence Models in Health Information Exchange: A Systematic Review of Clinical Implications.健康信息交换中的人工智能模型:对临床意义的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 19;11(18):2584. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182584.

本文引用的文献

1
A Survey Of Health Information Exchange Organizations In Advance Of A Nationwide Connectivity Framework.在建立全国性互联互通框架之前对健康信息交换组织的调查。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 May;40(5):736-744. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01497.
2
Privacy protections to encourage use of health-relevant digital data in a learning health system.隐私保护措施,以鼓励在学习型健康系统中使用与健康相关的数字数据。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):2. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00362-8.
3
Frequency and Types of Patient-Reported Errors in Electronic Health Record Ambulatory Care Notes.电子健康记录门诊护理记录中患者报告错误的频率和类型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e205867. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5867.
4
Assessment of Patient Use of a New Approach to Access Health Record Data Among 12 US Health Systems.评估 12 个美国卫生系统中患者对获取健康记录数据新方法的使用情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199544. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9544.
5
Factors Influencing Progress of Health Information Exchange Organizations in the United States.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:1236.
6
Health Information Exchange in US Hospitals: The Current Landscape and a Path to Improved Information Sharing.美国医院中的健康信息交换:当前现状及改善信息共享的途径
J Hosp Med. 2017 Mar;12(3):193-198. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2704.
7
Time for a Patient-Driven Health Information Economy?是时候建立以患者为导向的健康信息经济了吗?
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 21;374(3):205-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1512142.
8
Consumer-mediated health information exchanges: the 2012 ACMI debate.消费者主导的健康信息交流:2012 年 ACMI 辩论。
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:5-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
9
Consumers' perceptions about and use of the internet for personal health records and health information exchange: analysis of the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey.消费者对互联网用于个人健康记录和健康信息交换的认知与使用:2007年健康信息国家趋势调查分析
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 18;12(4):e73. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1668.
10
Patients' attitudes toward electronic health information exchange: qualitative study.患者对电子健康信息交换的态度:定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Aug 6;11(3):e30. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1164.