急性胰腺炎的理想评分系统：对圣杯的探寻。
Ideal scoring system for acute pancreatitis: Quest for the Holy Grail.
作者信息
Juneja Deven
机构信息
Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi 110017, India.
出版信息
World J Crit Care Med. 2022 May 9;11(3):198-200. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.198.
Abstract
Clinical scoring systems are required to predict complications, severity, need for intensive care unit admission, and mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis. Over the years, many scores have been developed, tested, and compared for their efficacy and accuracy. An ideal score should be rapid, reliable, and validated in different patient populations and geographical areas and should not lose relevance over time. A combination of scores or serial monitoring of a single score may increase their efficacy.
摘要
需要临床评分系统来预测急性胰腺炎患者的并发症、严重程度、入住重症监护病房的必要性以及死亡率。多年来，已经开发、测试并比较了许多评分系统的有效性和准确性。理想的评分系统应该快速、可靠，在不同患者群体和地理区域得到验证，并且不会随时间失去相关性。联合使用评分系统或对单一评分系统进行连续监测可能会提高其有效性。
相似文献
1
Ideal scoring system for acute pancreatitis: Quest for the Holy Grail.急性胰腺炎的理想评分系统：对圣杯的探寻。
World J Crit Care Med. 2022 May 9;11(3):198-200. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.198.
2
Severe acute pancreatitis admitted to intensive care unit: SOFA is superior to Ranson's criteria and APACHE II in determining prognosis.入住重症监护病房的重症急性胰腺炎：序贯器官衰竭评估（SOFA）在判断预后方面优于兰森标准和急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II（APACHE II）。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2013;24(5):430-5. doi: 10.4318/tjg.2013.0761.
3
Serial evaluation of the SOFA score is reliable for predicting mortality in acute severe pancreatitis.序贯评估序贯器官衰竭评估（SOFA）评分对预测急性重症胰腺炎的死亡率是可靠的。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(7):e9654. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009654.
4
Scoring systems in acute pancreatitis: which one to use in intensive care units?急性胰腺炎的评分系统：在重症监护病房中应该使用哪一种？
J Crit Care. 2010 Jun;25(2):358.e9-358.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
5
Comparison of existing clinical scoring systems to predict persistent organ failure in patients with acute pancreatitis.比较现有的临床评分系统以预测急性胰腺炎患者持续器官衰竭的发生。
Gastroenterology. 2012 Jun;142(7):1476-82; quiz e15-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
6
7
Scoring of human acute pancreatitis: state of the art.急性胰腺炎严重程度的评估：现状。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Aug;398(6):789-97. doi: 10.1007/s00423-013-1087-0. Epub 2013 May 17.
8
Use of CT-Based Scoring System in Assessment of Pancreatitis Severity.基于CT的评分系统在评估胰腺炎严重程度中的应用。
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Nov 14;7(23):3997-4003. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.597. eCollection 2019 Dec 15.
9
A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis.放射学和临床评分系统在急性胰腺炎严重程度早期预测中的比较评估。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr;107(4):612-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.438. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
10
Accuracy of conventional and novel scoring systems in predicting severity and outcomes of acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study.常规和新型评分系统在预测急性胰腺炎严重程度和结局中的准确性：一项回顾性研究。
Lipids Health Dis. 2021 Apr 27;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12944-021-01470-4.
引用本文的文献
1
Acute pancreatitis: A review of diagnosis, severity prediction and prognosis assessment from imaging technology, scoring system and artificial intelligence.急性胰腺炎：影像学技术、评分系统和人工智能在诊断、严重程度预测和预后评估方面的综述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Oct 7;29(37):5268-5291. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i37.5268.
本文引用的文献
1
Sequential organ failure assessment score is superior to other prognostic indices in acute pancreatitis.序贯器官衰竭评估评分在急性胰腺炎中优于其他预后指标。
World J Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 9;10(6):355-368. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v10.i6.355.
2
Machine learning predictive models for acute pancreatitis: A systematic review.机器学习预测急性胰腺炎模型的系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Jan;157:104641. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104641. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
3
Current Utility of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score: A Literature Review and Future Directions.序贯器官衰竭评估评分的当前应用：文献综述与未来方向
Open Respir Med J. 2021 Apr 13;15:1-6. doi: 10.2174/1874306402115010001. eCollection 2021.
4
Prediction of Outcome in Acute Pancreatitis by the qSOFA and the New ERAP Score.qSOFA 和新的 ERAP 评分对急性胰腺炎预后的预测。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Apr;67(4):1371-1378. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06945-z. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
5
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义（脓毒症-3）》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
6
Scoring systems in acute pancreatitis: which one to use in intensive care units?急性胰腺炎的评分系统：在重症监护病房中应该使用哪一种？
J Crit Care. 2010 Jun;25(2):358.e9-358.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
7
The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.用于描述器官功能障碍/衰竭的序贯器官衰竭评估（SOFA）评分。代表欧洲重症监护医学学会脓毒症相关问题工作组。
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Jul;22(7):707-10. doi: 10.1007/BF01709751.
Zotero 插件