Kashyap Rahul, Sherani Khalid M, Dutt Taru, Gnanapandithan Karthik, Sagar Malvika, Vallabhajosyula Saraschandra, Vakil Abhay P, Surani Salim
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, Jamaica, NY 11418, USA.
Open Respir Med J. 2021 Apr 13;15:1-6. doi: 10.2174/1874306402115010001. eCollection 2021.
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is commonly used in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) to evaluate, prognosticate and assess patients. Since its validation, the SOFA score has served in various settings, including medical, trauma, surgical, cardiac, and neurological ICUs. It has been a strong mortality predictor and literature over the years has documented the ability of the SOFA score to accurately distinguish survivors from non-survivors on admission. Over the years, multiple variations have been proposed to the SOFA score, which have led to the evolution of alternate validated scoring models replacing one or more components of the SOFA scoring system. Various SOFA based models have been used to evaluate specific clinical populations, such as patients with cardiac dysfunction, hepatic failure, renal failure, different races and public health illnesses, . This study is aimed to conduct a review of modifications in SOFA score in the past several years. We review the literature evaluating various modifications to the SOFA score such as modified SOFA, Modified SOFA, modified Cardiovascular SOFA, Extra-renal SOFA, Chronic Liver Failure SOFA, Mexican SOFA, quick SOFA, Lactic acid quick SOFA (LqSOFA), SOFA in hematological malignancies, SOFA with Richmond Agitation-Sedation scale and Pediatric SOFA. Various organ systems, their relevant scoring and the proposed modifications in each of these systems are presented in detail. There is a need to incorporate the most recent literature into the SOFA scoring system to make it more relevant and accurate in this rapidly evolving critical care environment. For future directions, we plan to put together most if not all updates in SOFA score and probably validate it in a large database a single institution and validate it in multisite data base.
序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分常用于重症监护病房(ICU)对患者进行评估、预后判断和病情评估。自其被验证以来,SOFA评分已应用于各种场景,包括内科、创伤、外科、心脏和神经科ICU。多年来,它一直是强有力的死亡率预测指标,并且文献记载了SOFA评分在入院时准确区分存活者与非存活者的能力。多年来,人们对SOFA评分提出了多种变体,这导致了替代的经过验证的评分模型的演变,这些模型取代了SOFA评分系统的一个或多个组成部分。各种基于SOFA的模型已被用于评估特定的临床人群,如心脏功能障碍、肝功能衰竭、肾功能衰竭、不同种族以及公共卫生疾病患者。本研究旨在对过去几年中SOFA评分的修改进行综述。我们回顾了评估SOFA评分各种修改的文献,如改良SOFA、修正SOFA、改良心血管SOFA、肾外SOFA、慢性肝功能衰竭SOFA、墨西哥SOFA、快速SOFA、乳酸快速SOFA(LqSOFA)、血液系统恶性肿瘤中的SOFA、结合里士满躁动 - 镇静量表的SOFA以及儿科SOFA。详细介绍了各种器官系统、其相关评分以及这些系统中每个系统的提议修改。有必要将最新的文献纳入SOFA评分系统中,以便在这个快速发展的重症监护环境中使其更具相关性和准确性。对于未来的方向,我们计划整合SOFA评分中大部分(如果不是全部)的更新内容,并可能在单个机构的大型数据库中对其进行验证,然后在多中心数据库中进行验证。