• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Response to the Letter to the Editor: Does the Risk of Death Within 48 Hours of Hip Hemiarthroplasty Differ Between Patients Treated With Cemented and Cementless Implants? A Meta-analysis of Large, National Registries.

作者信息

Dahl Ola E, Pripp Are Hugo

机构信息

Centre of Medical Science, Education and Innovation, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway.

Thrombosis Research Institute, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Dec 1;480(12):2470-2471. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002475. Epub 2022 Nov 4.

DOI:10.1097/CORR.0000000000002475
PMID:36332005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10538910/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Response to the Letter to the Editor: Does the Risk of Death Within 48 Hours of Hip Hemiarthroplasty Differ Between Patients Treated With Cemented and Cementless Implants? A Meta-analysis of Large, National Registries.致编辑的信的回复：半髋关节置换术后48小时内死亡风险在使用骨水泥型和非骨水泥型植入物的患者之间是否存在差异？一项基于大型国家登记处的荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Dec 1;480(12):2470-2471. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002475. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
2
Letter to the Editor: Does the Risk of Death Within 48 Hours of Hip Hemiarthroplasty Differ Between Patients Treated With Cemented and Cementless Implants? A Meta-analysis of Large, National Registries.致编辑的信：骨水泥型和非骨水泥型髋关节半关节置换术后48小时内的死亡风险在接受这两种植入物治疗的患者之间是否存在差异？一项基于大型国家登记处数据的荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Dec 1;480(12):2468-2469. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002443. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
3
Does the Risk of Death Within 48 Hours of Hip Hemiarthroplasty Differ Between Patients Treated with Cemented and Cementless Implants? A Meta-analysis of Large, National Registries.骨水泥型和非骨水泥型髋关节置换术患者在术后 48 小时内的死亡风险是否存在差异？大型国家注册数据库的荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Feb 1;480(2):343-350. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001952.
4
CORR Insights®: Does the Risk of Death Within 48 Hours of Hip Hemiarthroplasty Differ Between Patients Treated with Cemented and Cementless Implants? A Meta-analysis of Large, National Registries.CORR 见解®：半髋关节置换术后48小时内死亡风险在使用骨水泥型和非骨水泥型植入物治疗的患者之间是否存在差异？一项基于大型国家登记处的荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Feb 1;480(2):351-353. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001977.
5
Cemented cementless hemiarthroplasty for a displaced fracture of the femoral neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current generation hip stems.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型半髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈移位骨折：当代髋关节假体柄的系统评价和荟萃分析
Bone Joint J. 2017 Apr;99-B(4):421-431. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B4.BJJ-2016-0758.R1.
6
Perioperative Periprosthetic Femur Fractures are Strongly Correlated With Fixation Method: an Analysis From the American Joint Replacement Registry.围手术期假体周围股骨骨折与固定方法密切相关：来自美国关节置换登记处的分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S352-S354. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
7
[Aseptic revisions and pulmonary embolism after surgical treatment of femoral neck fractures with cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty in Germany : An analysis from the Germany Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD)].[德国骨水泥型和非骨水泥型半髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈骨折后的无菌性翻修与肺栓塞：来自德国关节置换登记处（EPRD）的分析]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023 Aug;52(8):670-676. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04412-3. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
8
In reply to the letter to the editor regarding "Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in patients with neuromuscular diseases: a minimum of 2 years' follow-up study".回复致编辑的关于“骨水泥型与非骨水泥型半髋关节置换术治疗神经肌肉疾病患者股骨颈骨折：至少2年随访研究”的信。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Aug 25;16(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02674-1.
9
Cemented versus cementless hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.老年股骨颈骨折的骨水泥型与非骨水泥型半髋关节置换术
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014 Aug;22(2):186-9. doi: 10.1177/230949901402200214.
10
Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.55岁及以上原发性骨关节炎患者的全髋关节置换术。芬兰关节置换登记处的分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2160-70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00870.

本文引用的文献

1
Letter to the Editor: Does the Risk of Death Within 48 Hours of Hip Hemiarthroplasty Differ Between Patients Treated With Cemented and Cementless Implants? A Meta-analysis of Large, National Registries.致编辑的信：骨水泥型和非骨水泥型髋关节半关节置换术后48小时内的死亡风险在接受这两种植入物治疗的患者之间是否存在差异？一项基于大型国家登记处数据的荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Dec 1;480(12):2468-2469. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002443. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
2
Does the Risk of Death Within 48 Hours of Hip Hemiarthroplasty Differ Between Patients Treated with Cemented and Cementless Implants? A Meta-analysis of Large, National Registries.骨水泥型和非骨水泥型髋关节置换术患者在术后 48 小时内的死亡风险是否存在差异？大型国家注册数据库的荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Feb 1;480(2):343-350. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001952.
3
Association Between Cemented vs Cementless Hemiarthroplasty and Short-Term Change of In-Hospital Mortality in Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis in a Multicenter Database.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型半髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折患者短期院内死亡率变化的相关性：多中心数据库倾向评分匹配分析。
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Jun 21;16:1151-1159. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S315090. eCollection 2021.
4
Letter to the Editor: Cemented or Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture? Data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.致编辑的信：股骨颈骨折采用骨水泥型或非骨水泥型半髋关节置换术？来自挪威髋部骨折登记处的数据。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Mar;478(3):685-686. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001122.
5
Cemented or Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture? Data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.骨水泥型或非骨水泥型人工股骨头置换治疗股骨颈骨折？来自挪威髋关节骨折登记处的数据。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jan;478(1):90-100. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000826.
6
Perioperative mortality in hip fracture patients treated with cemented and uncemented hemiprosthesis: a register study of 11,210 patients.骨水泥型和非骨水泥型半髋关节假体治疗髋部骨折患者的围手术期死亡率：一项 11210 例患者的注册研究。
Int Orthop. 2013 Jun;37(6):1135-40. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1851-3. Epub 2013 Mar 19.