• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为立法和预算提案提供证据分级支持——退伍军人健康管理局实施证据法案的关键。

Grading Evidence to Support Legislative and Budget Proposals-Veterans Health Administration's Key to Implementing the Evidence Act.

机构信息

Partnered Evidence-Based Policy Resource Center, Boston VA Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Partnered Evidence-Based Policy Resource Center, Boston VA Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Value Health. 2023 Jun;26(6):902-908. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.10.007. Epub 2022 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2022.10.007
PMID:36332893
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11340122/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 requires cabinet-level agencies to use evidence to justify and support budget and policy making. As investigators from the Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) program, we were tasked with assisting Veterans Health Administration (VHA) leadership with the implementation of the Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018. Through meetings with stakeholders, we identified a gap in the review process for legislative and budget proposals; no systematic process existed to evaluate the supporting evidence base for proposals.

METHODS

Here, we describe the development, refinement, and use of a checklist to assess the strength of evidence included in VHA legislative and budget proposals for changes to care delivery; clinical, research, and administrative operations; and staffing and workforce issues.

RESULTS

The evidence assessment checklist is now part of the regular review process for VHA legislative and budget proposals. It is also being adapted for use elsewhere within the Department of Veterans Affairs. The checklist has provided a framework for briefings and training on best practices for using evidence to guide policy and budget decisions.

CONCLUSION

Including evidence reviews in the legislative and budget proposal prioritization process may be an effective institutional arrangement to promote the use of evidence to inform high-level health policy decisions and to build a "culture of evidence" within the government.

摘要

目的

2018 年《循证决策法》要求内阁级机构利用证据来证明和支持预算及政策制定。作为质量提升研究倡议(QUERI)计划的调查人员,我们的任务是协助退伍军人事务部(VA)领导层实施 2018 年《循证决策法》。通过与利益相关者的会议,我们发现立法和预算提案审查过程中存在一个空白;没有系统的流程来评估提案的支持证据基础。

方法

在这里,我们描述了一个检查表的开发、完善和使用,以评估退伍军人事务部立法和预算提案中用于改变医疗服务提供、临床、研究和行政运营以及人员配备和劳动力问题的证据强度。

结果

证据评估检查表现在是退伍军人事务部立法和预算提案定期审查过程的一部分。它也正在为退伍军人事务部内部其他地方的使用而进行调整。该检查表为使用证据指导政策和预算决策的最佳实践提供了一个框架,包括简报和培训。

结论

将证据审查纳入立法和预算提案的优先级确定过程中,可能是促进利用证据为高层卫生政策决策提供信息并在政府内部建立“证据文化”的有效体制安排。

相似文献

1
Grading Evidence to Support Legislative and Budget Proposals-Veterans Health Administration's Key to Implementing the Evidence Act.为立法和预算提案提供证据分级支持——退伍军人健康管理局实施证据法案的关键。
Value Health. 2023 Jun;26(6):902-908. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.10.007. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
2
Linking implementation science and policy: Process and tools for congressionally mandated implementation, evaluation, and reporting.将实施科学与政策联系起来:国会授权的实施、评估和报告的过程和工具。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14357. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14357. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3
Accelerating Research Impact in a Learning Health Care System: VA's Quality Enhancement Research Initiative in the Choice Act Era.在学习型医疗保健系统中加速研究影响力:《选择法案》时代退伍军人事务部的质量提升研究计划。
Med Care. 2017 Jul;55 Suppl 7 Suppl 1(7 Suppl 1):S4-S12. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000683.
4
Aligning quality improvement efforts and policy goals in a national integrated health system.在国家综合卫生系统中协调质量改进工作和政策目标。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-19. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13944. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
5
User survey finds rapid evidence reviews increased uptake of evidence by Veterans Health Administration leadership to inform fast-paced health-system decision-making.用户调查发现,快速证据审查提高了退伍军人健康管理局领导层对证据的采纳率,为快节奏的卫生系统决策提供依据。
Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 5;5(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0306-5.
6
7
8
The Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Impact Framework: Measuring the Real-world Impact of Implementation Science.质量提升研究计划(QUERI)影响框架:衡量实施科学的真实世界影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):396-403. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06143-z. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
9
Competing Demands: Scheduling Challenges in Being Veteran-centric in the Setting of Health System Initiatives to Improve Access.竞争需求:在改善医疗服务获取的卫生系统计划中以退伍军人为中心所面临的调度挑战。
Mil Med. 2021 Nov 2;186(11-12):e1233-e1240. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa520.
10
Factors that affect implementation of a nurse staffing directive: results from a qualitative multi-case evaluation.影响护士人员配置指令实施的因素:一项多案例定性评估的结果
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Aug;72(8):1886-98. doi: 10.1111/jan.12961. Epub 2016 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The translation-to-policy learning cycle to improve public health.用于改善公共卫生的翻译到政策的学习循环。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Oct 11;8(4):e10463. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10463. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Aligning quality improvement efforts and policy goals in a national integrated health system.在国家综合卫生系统中协调质量改进工作和政策目标。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-19. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13944. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
2
Program Evaluation of Population- and System-Level Policies: Evidence for Decision Making.人群和系统层面政策的方案评估:决策证据。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Jan;42(1):17-27. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211016427. Epub 2021 May 27.
3
Lawmakers' use of scientific evidence can be improved.立法者对科学证据的使用可以得到改善。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 2;118(9). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012955118.
4
What prevents health policy being 'evidence-based'? New ways to think about evidence, policy and interventions in health.是什么阻碍了卫生政策成为“基于证据的”?思考卫生领域证据、政策及干预措施的新方法。
Br Med Bull. 2020 Oct 14;135(1):38-49. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldaa026.
5
Moving Toward Evidence-Based Policy: The Value of Randomization for Program and Policy Implementation.迈向基于证据的政策:随机化在项目与政策实施中的价值。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 7;323(1):21-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18061.
6
Ten ways to optimize evidence-based policy.优化循证政策的十种方法。
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Nov;8(15):1253-1256. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0132. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
Research Lifecycle to Increase the Substantial Real-world Impact of Research: Accelerating Innovations to Application.研究生命周期以提高研究的实质性实际影响:加速创新到应用。
Med Care. 2019 Oct;57 Suppl 10 Suppl 3(10 Suppl 3):S206-S212. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001146.
8
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
9
Building upon foundations for evidence-based policy.基于循证政策的基础之上。
Science. 2019 May 10;364(6440):534-535. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw9446.
10
Testing Novel Payment and Delivery Approaches Through the Veterans Health Administration's New Center for Innovation.通过退伍军人健康管理局的新创新中心测试新型支付和交付方式。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 15;170(2):112-113. doi: 10.7326/M18-2225. Epub 2018 Dec 25.