• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价快速序贯诱导插管中有效患者体位的方案。

Protocol for a systematic review on effective patient positioning for rapid sequence intubation.

机构信息

Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada

Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 4;12(11):e062988. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062988.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062988
PMID:36332945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9639087/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is an advanced airway technique to perform endotracheal intubation in patients at high risk of aspiration. Although RSI is recognised as a life-saving technique and performed by many physicians in various settings (emergency departments, intensive care units), there is still a lack of consensus on various features of the procedure, most notably patient positioning. Previously, experts have commented on the unique drawbacks and benefits of various positions and studies have been published comparing patient positions and how it can affect endotracheal intubation in the context of RSI. The purpose of this systematic review is to compile the existing evidence to understand and compare how different patient positions can potentially affect the success of RSI.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will use MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to source studies from 1946 to 2021 that evaluate the impact of patient positioning on endotracheal intubation in the context of RSI. We will include randomised control trials, case-control studies, prospective/retrospective cohort studies and mannequin simulation studies for consideration in this systematic review. Subsequently, we will generate a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram to display how we selected our final studies for inclusion in the review. Two independent reviewers will complete the study screening, selection and extraction, with a third reviewer available to address any conflicts. The reviewers will extract this data in accordance with our outcomes of interest and display it in a table format to highlight patient-relevant outcomes and difficulty airway management outcomes. We will use the Risk of Bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess included studies for bias.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This systematic review does not require ethics approval, as all patient-centred data will be reported from published studies.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022289773.

摘要

简介

快速序贯插管(RSI)是一种在有高误吸风险的患者中进行经气管插管的高级气道技术。尽管 RSI 被认为是一种救生技术,并且在各种环境(急诊科、重症监护病房)中由许多医生执行,但在该程序的各个方面仍缺乏共识,尤其是患者体位。以前,专家们曾对各种体位的独特优缺点发表过评论,并且已经发表了一些研究比较了患者体位以及在 RSI 背景下它如何影响气管插管。本系统评价的目的是汇编现有证据,以了解和比较不同患者体位如何潜在地影响 RSI 的成功率。

方法和分析

我们将使用 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆从 1946 年至 2021 年的研究中寻找评估 RSI 中患者体位对气管插管影响的研究。我们将包括随机对照试验、病例对照研究、前瞻性/回顾性队列研究和模拟人体研究以供本系统评价考虑。随后,我们将生成 PRISMA 流程图以显示我们如何选择最终纳入审查的研究。两名独立的审查员将完成研究筛选、选择和提取,第三名审查员可解决任何冲突。审查员将根据我们感兴趣的结果提取这些数据并以表格形式显示,以突出患者相关结果和困难气道管理结果。我们将使用偏倚风险工具和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估纳入研究的偏倚。

伦理和传播

本系统评价不需要伦理批准,因为所有以患者为中心的数据都将从已发表的研究中报告。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022289773。

相似文献

1
Protocol for a systematic review on effective patient positioning for rapid sequence intubation.系统评价快速序贯诱导插管中有效患者体位的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 4;12(11):e062988. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062988.
2
Effectiveness and risks of cricoid pressure during rapid sequence induction for endotracheal intubation.快速顺序诱导气管插管时环状软骨压迫的有效性及风险
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 18;2015(11):CD011656. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011656.pub2.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Association of Checklist Use in Endotracheal Intubation With Clinically Important Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.检查表在气管插管中应用与临床重要结局的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209278. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9278.
5
Effect of inclined positioning on first-pass success during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.倾斜体位对经口气管插管首次成功率的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Apr;40(4):293-299. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211968. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
6
Review article: Effectiveness and risks of cricoid pressure during rapid sequence induction for endotracheal intubation in the emergency department: A systematic review.综述文章:急诊科行快速序贯诱导气管插管时环状软骨按压的有效性和风险:系统评价。
Emerg Med Australas. 2022 Aug;34(4):484-491. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13993. Epub 2022 May 16.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube for percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients.在危重症成年患者中,喉罩气道与气管内导管用于经皮扩张气管切开术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 30;2014(6):CD009901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009901.pub2.
9
Predictive and protective factors for failing first pass intubation in prehospital rapid sequence intubation: an aetiology and risk systematic review with meta-analysis.预测和保护因素在院前快速序贯诱导插管失败的第一次尝试:病因和风险系统评价与荟萃分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 May;132(5):918-935. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.02.004. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
10
Effect of sedation with inhaled anaesthetics on cognitive and psychiatric outcomes in critically ill adults: a systematic review protocol.吸入麻醉镇静对危重症成年人认知和精神结局的影响:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 7;12(2):e052893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052893.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid sequence induction: where did the consensus go?快速顺序诱导:共识何在?
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 May 13;29(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00883-5.
2
Pre-hospital emergency anaesthesia in the United Kingdom: an observational cohort study.英国院前急救中的急诊麻醉:一项观察性队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 May;124(5):579-584. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.01.023. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
3
The optimal dose of succinylcholine for rapid sequence induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.琥珀胆碱在快速序贯诱导中的最佳剂量:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar 2;20(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00968-1.
4
An international survey about rapid sequence intubation of 10,003 anaesthetists and 16 airway experts.一项针对 10003 名麻醉师和 16 名气道专家的关于快速序贯插管的国际调查。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Mar;75(3):313-322. doi: 10.1111/anae.14867. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
5
Ketamine as a Rapid Sequence Induction Agent in the Trauma Population: A Systematic Review.氯胺酮在创伤人群中的快速序贯诱导作用:系统评价。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Mar;128(3):504-510. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003568.
6
Rocuronium vs. succinylcholine for rapid sequence intubation: a Cochrane systematic review.罗库溴铵与琥珀胆碱用于快速序贯插管:一项 Cochrane 系统评价。
Anaesthesia. 2017 Jun;72(6):765-777. doi: 10.1111/anae.13903.
7
Prevention of aspiration of gastric contents during attempt in tracheal intubation in the semi-lateral and lateral positions.在半侧卧位和侧卧位进行气管插管尝试期间预防胃内容物误吸。
World J Emerg Med. 2016;7(4):285-289. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.04.008.
8
Effectiveness and risks of cricoid pressure during rapid sequence induction for endotracheal intubation.快速顺序诱导气管插管时环状软骨压迫的有效性及风险
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 18;2015(11):CD011656. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011656.pub2.
9
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
10
Rapid sequence induction and intubation: current controversy.快速序贯诱导和插管:当前的争议。
Anesth Analg. 2010 May 1;110(5):1318-25. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181d5ae47. Epub 2010 Mar 17.