Department of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 4;12(1):18737. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21330-0.
Hyaluronic acid (HA) and cyclosporine A (CsA) eyedrops are commonly prescribed in dry eye syndrome (DES). The effectiveness of each preparation in DES is well-known, yet the superiority of one over another has been studied little. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of 0.15% HA compared to combinations of 0.05% CsA plus 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), and 0.15% HA plus 0.05% CsA in patients with moderate to severe DES. Total 438 patients with moderate to severe DES were recruited and randomized for one of the three treatments for 12 weeks. Effectiveness was assessed at baseline, 4- and 12-weeks. The primary endpoint was change in corneal staining score. The secondary endpoints were tear break-up time (TBUT), strip meniscometry (SM) score, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, and tolerability questionnaire. The change in corneal staining score for 0.15% HA from the baseline was non-inferior to that of 0.05% CsA. Corneal staining score, TBUT, SM score, and OSDI score improved in all groups without statistically significant intergroup differences. Better tolerability and lower prevalence of adverse drug reactions were seen in 0.15% HA. Our findings suggest that 0.15% HA may be equivalently effective and safer than 0.05% CsA in treating moderate to severe DES.
透明质酸(HA)和环孢素 A(CsA)滴眼液常用于治疗干眼症(DES)。每种制剂在 DES 中的疗效是众所周知的,但它们之间的优势却很少被研究。我们评估了 0.15%HA 与 0.05%CsA 加 0.5%羧甲基纤维素(CMC)和 0.15%HA 加 0.05%CsA 联合治疗中重度 DES 患者的疗效和耐受性。共有 438 名中重度 DES 患者被招募并随机分为三组进行 12 周的治疗。在基线、4 周和 12 周评估疗效。主要终点是角膜染色评分的变化。次要终点是泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)、条带角膜曲率计(SM)评分、眼表面疾病指数(OSDI)评分和耐受性问卷。从基线开始,0.15%HA 的角膜染色评分变化与 0.05%CsA 相当。所有组的角膜染色评分、TBUT、SM 评分和 OSDI 评分均有所改善,组间无统计学差异。0.15%HA 的耐受性更好,不良反应发生率更低。我们的发现表明,0.15%HA 在治疗中重度 DES 方面可能与 0.05%CsA 同样有效且更安全。