Suppr超能文献

银屑病关节炎和强直性脊柱炎实现疾病控制的临床及经济效益:来自OM1注册研究的回顾性分析

Clinical and Economic Benefit of Achieving Disease Control in Psoriatic Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Retrospective Analysis from the OM1 Registry.

作者信息

Bergman Martin J, Zueger Patrick, Patel Jayeshkumar, Saffore Christopher D, Topuria Ia, Cavanaugh Cristi, Fang Siran, Clewell Jerry, Ogdie Alexis

机构信息

College of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Feb;10(1):187-199. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00504-2. Epub 2022 Nov 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited evidence on the clinical and economic benefit of achieving disease control in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), thus we aimed to assess the impact of disease control on healthcare resource use (HCRU) and direct medical costs among US patients with PsA or AS over 1 year.

METHODS

Data were derived from the US OM1 PsA/AS registries (PsA: 1/2013-12/2020; AS: 01/2013-4/2021) and the Optum Insight Clinformatics® Data Mart to identify adult patients with PsA or AS. Two cohorts were created: with disease control and without disease control. Disease control was defined as modified Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA28) ≤ 4 for PsA and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) < 4 for AS. Outcomes were all-cause inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department (ED) visits and associated costs over a 1-year follow-up period. Mean costs per person per year (PPPY) were assessed descriptively and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for the likelihood of HCRU by logistic regression.

RESULTS

The study included 1235 PsA (with disease control: N = 217; without: N = 1018) and 581 AS patients (with disease control: N = 342; without: N = 239). Patients without disease control were more likely to have an inpatient (aOR [95% CI]; PsA: 3.0 [0.9, 10.1]; AS: 7.7 [2.3, 25.1]) or ED (PsA: 1.6 [0.6, 4.2]; AS: 3.5 [1.5, 8.3]) visit than those with disease control. Those without disease control, vs. those with disease control, had greater PPPY costs associated with inpatient (PsA: $1550 vs. $443), outpatient (PsA: $1789 vs. $1327; AS: $2498 vs. $2023), and ED (PsA: $114 vs. $57; AS: $316 vs. $50) visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study demonstrate lower disease activity among patients with PsA and AS is associated with less HCRU and lower costs over the following year.

摘要

背景

关于银屑病关节炎(PsA)和强直性脊柱炎(AS)实现疾病控制的临床和经济效益的证据有限,因此我们旨在评估疾病控制对美国PsA或AS患者1年以上医疗资源使用(HCRU)和直接医疗费用的影响。

方法

数据来自美国OM1 PsA/AS注册库(PsA:2013年1月至2020年12月;AS:2013年1月至2021年4月)和Optum Insight Clinformatics®数据集市,以识别成年PsA或AS患者。创建了两个队列:疾病得到控制的队列和疾病未得到控制的队列。疾病控制定义为银屑病关节炎改良疾病活动指数(DAPSA28)对于PsA≤4,强直性脊柱炎疾病活动指数(BASDAI)对于AS<4。结局是全因住院、门诊和急诊科(ED)就诊以及1年随访期内的相关费用。描述性评估每人每年的平均费用(PPPY),并通过逻辑回归估计HCRU可能性的调整比值比(aOR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

该研究纳入了1235例PsA患者(疾病得到控制:N = 217;未得到控制:N = 1018)和581例AS患者(疾病得到控制:N = 342;未得到控制:N = 239)。与疾病得到控制的患者相比,疾病未得到控制的患者更有可能住院(aOR [95% CI];PsA:3.0 [0.9, 10.1];AS:7.7 [2.3, 25.1])或到急诊科就诊(PsA:1.6 [0.6, 4.2];AS:3.5 [1.5, 8.3])。与疾病得到控制的患者相比,疾病未得到控制的患者住院(PsA:1550美元对443美元)、门诊(PsA:1789美元对1327美元;AS:2498美元对2023美元)和急诊科就诊(PsA:114美元对57美元;AS:316美元对50美元)的PPPY成本更高。

结论

本研究结果表明,PsA和AS患者较低的疾病活动度与次年较少的HCRU和较低的费用相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/118f/9931970/49b66816c113/40744_2022_504_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验