Stock Miriam R, Fine Rona Orentlicher, Rivas Yolanda, Levin Terry L
Medical Program, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Division of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th St., Bronx, NY, 10467, USA.
Pediatr Radiol. 2023 Mar;53(3):358-366. doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05537-x. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
The role of MRI in evaluating children with an in situ gallbladder and suspected choledocholithiasis following a negative or inconclusive US is unclear.
To determine whether MRI benefits children with suspected choledocholithiasis and a normal common bile duct (CBD) without stones on US.
We conducted a retrospective 10-year review of paired US and MRI (within 10 days) in children 18 years or younger with suspected choledocholithiasis. With MRI as a reference standard, two reviewers independently evaluated the images for CBD diameter, choledocholithiasis, cholelithiasis and pancreatic edema. Serum lipase was recorded. We calculated exact binomial confidence limits for test positive predictive values (PPVs) and negative predictive values (NPVs) using R library epiR.
Of 87 patients (46 female, 41 male; mean age 14 years, standard deviation [SD] 4.6 years; mean interval between US and MRI 1.6 days, SD 1.8 days), 55% (48/87) had true-negative US, without CBD dilation/stones confirmed on MRI; 5% (4/87) had false-positive US showing CBD dilatation without stones, not confirmed on MRI; 33% (29/87) had true-positive US, with MRI confirming CBD dilatation; and 7% (6/87) had false-negative US, where MRI revealed CBD stones without dilatation (2 patients) and CBD dilatation with or without stones (4 patients). Patients with false-negative US had persistent or worsening symptoms, pancreatitis or SCD. The overall US false-negative rate was 17% (6/35). Normal-caliber CBD on US without stones had an NPV of 89% (48/54, 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.96).
MRI adds little information in children with a sonographically normal CBD except in the setting of pancreatitis or worsening clinical symptoms. Further evaluation is warranted in children with elevated risk of stone disease.
对于超声检查结果为阴性或不确定的原位胆囊且疑似胆总管结石的儿童,MRI在评估中的作用尚不清楚。
确定MRI对疑似胆总管结石且超声显示胆总管(CBD)正常无结石的儿童是否有益。
我们对18岁及以下疑似胆总管结石的儿童进行了为期10年的超声与MRI(10天内)配对回顾性研究。以MRI作为参考标准,两名阅片者独立评估图像中的CBD直径、胆总管结石、胆囊结石和胰腺水肿情况。记录血清脂肪酶水平。我们使用R语言库epiR计算检验阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)的确切二项式置信区间。
87例患者(46例女性,41例男性;平均年龄14岁,标准差[SD]4.6岁;超声与MRI的平均间隔时间1.6天,SD 1.8天)中,55%(48/87)超声检查为真阴性,MRI未证实CBD扩张/结石;5%(4/87)超声检查为假阳性,显示CBD扩张但无结石,MRI未证实;33%(29/87)超声检查为真阳性,MRI证实CBD扩张;7%(6/87)超声检查为假阴性,MRI显示CBD有结石但无扩张(2例患者)以及CBD有扩张伴或不伴结石(4例患者)。超声检查为假阴性的患者有持续或加重的症状、胰腺炎或镰状细胞病(SCD)。超声检查的总体假阴性率为17%(6/35)。超声显示无结石的正常管径CBD的NPV为89%(48/54,95%置信区间:0.77 - 0.96)。
对于超声检查显示CBD正常的儿童,除了胰腺炎或临床症状恶化的情况外,MRI提供的信息很少。对于结石病风险较高的儿童,有必要进行进一步评估。