Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jan 1;8(1):44-53. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.4187.
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has increasingly been used for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (uTBAD) despite limited supporting data.
To assess whether initial TEVAR following uTBAD is associated with reduced mortality or morbidity compared with medical therapy alone.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services inpatient claims data for adults aged 65 years or older with index admissions for acute uTBAD from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2018, with follow-up available through December 31, 2019.
Initial TEVAR was defined as TEVAR within 30 days of admission for acute uTBAD.
Outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular hospitalizations, aorta-related and repeated aorta-related hospitalizations, and aortic interventions associated with initial TEVAR vs medical therapy. Propensity score inverse probability weighting was used.
Of 7105 patients with eligible index admissions for acute uTBAD, 1140 (16.0%) underwent initial TEVAR (623 [54.6%] female; median age, 74 years [IQR, 68-80 years]) and 5965 (84.0%) did not undergo TEVAR (3344 [56.1%] female; median age, 76 years [IQR, 69-83 years]). Receipt of TEVAR was associated with region (vs South; Midwest: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.53-0.81]; P < .001; Northeast: aOR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.50-0.79]; P < .001), Medicaid dual eligibility (aOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.91; P = .003), hypertension (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.03-1.54; P = .03), peripheral vascular disease (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.49; P = .03), and year of admission (2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015 were associated with greater odds of TEVAR compared with 2011). After inverse probability weighting, mortality was similar for the 2 strategies up to 5 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85-1.06), as were aorta-related hospitalizations (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.99-1.27), aortic interventions (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84-1.20), and cardiovascular hospitalizations (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.93-1.20). In a sensitivity analysis that included deaths within the first 30 days, initial TEVAR was associated with lower mortality over a period of 1 year (adjusted HR [aHR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99; P = .03), 2 years (aHR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.96; P = .008), and 5 years (aHR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96; P = .004).
In this study, 16.0% of patients underwent initial TEVAR within 30 days of uTBAD, and receipt of initial TEVAR was associated with hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, region, Medicaid dual eligibility, and year of admission. Initial TEVAR was not associated with improved mortality or reduced hospitalizations or aortic interventions over a period of 5 years, but in a sensitivity analysis that included deaths within the first 30 days, initial TEVAR was associated with lower mortality. These findings, along with cost-effectiveness and quality of life, should be assessed in a prospective trial in the US population.
尽管缺乏支持数据,胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)已越来越多地用于治疗非复杂性 B 型主动脉夹层(uTBAD)。
评估与单纯药物治疗相比,uTBAD 后立即进行 TEVAR 是否与降低死亡率或发病率相关。
设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究纳入了医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)的住院记录数据,包括 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间因急性 uTBAD 首次入院的年龄在 65 岁及以上的成年人,随访至 2019 年 12 月 31 日。
初始 TEVAR 定义为急性 uTBAD 后 30 天内进行的 TEVAR。
结局包括全因死亡率、心血管住院率、与主动脉相关的和再次与主动脉相关的住院率,以及与初始 TEVAR 相比,与初始 TEVAR 相关的主动脉干预和单纯药物治疗的情况。采用倾向评分逆概率加权法。
在 7105 例符合条件的急性 uTBAD 指数入院患者中,1140 例(16.0%)接受了初始 TEVAR(623 例[54.6%]为女性;中位年龄为 74 岁[四分位距(IQR),68-80 岁]),5965 例(84.0%)未行 TEVAR(3344 例[56.1%]为女性;中位年龄为 76 岁[IQR,69-83 岁])。接受 TEVAR 治疗与区域(与南部相比;中西部:调整后的优势比[aOR],0.66[95%CI,0.53-0.81];P<0.001;东北部:aOR,0.63[95%CI,0.50-0.79];P<0.001)、医疗补助双重资格(aOR,0.76[95%CI,0.63-0.91];P=0.003)、高血压(aOR,1.26[95%CI,1.03-1.54];P=0.02)、外周血管疾病(aOR,1.24[95%CI,1.02-1.49];P=0.03)和入院年份(与 2011 年相比,2012、2013、2014 和 2015 年接受 TEVAR 的可能性更大)有关。在进行逆概率加权后,在 5 年内,两种策略的死亡率相似(风险比[HR],0.95[95%CI,0.85-1.06]),主动脉相关住院率(HR,1.12[95%CI,0.99-1.27])、主动脉介入治疗(HR,1.01[95%CI,0.84-1.20])和心血管住院率(HR,1.05[95%CI,0.93-1.20])也相似。在包括前 30 天内死亡的敏感性分析中,初始 TEVAR 与 1 年(校正 HR[aHR],0.86[95%CI,0.75-0.99];P=0.03)、2 年(aHR,0.85[95%CI,0.75-0.96];P=0.008)和 5 年(aHR,0.87[95%CI,0.80-0.96];P=0.004)的死亡率降低相关。
在这项研究中,16.0%的患者在 uTBAD 后 30 天内接受了初始 TEVAR,接受初始 TEVAR 与高血压、外周血管疾病、区域、医疗补助双重资格和入院年份有关。初始 TEVAR 与死亡率或减少住院率或主动脉干预无关,但在包括前 30 天内死亡的敏感性分析中,初始 TEVAR 与死亡率降低相关。这些发现,以及成本效益和生活质量,应在美国人群中进行前瞻性试验评估。