A propensity score matching study of totally robotic right hemicolectomy versus robot-assisted right hemicolectomy.

To compare and analyze the differences in safety, feasibility and short-term efficacy between robot-assisted right hemicolectomy (RARH) and totally robotic right hemicolectomy (TRRH). We collected the information of 184 patients who underwent right hemicolectomy in the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from July 2016 to December 2021. We matched 148 patients (74 with robot-assisted right hemicolectomy and 74 with totally robotic right hemicolectomy) to conduct a retrospective analysis of their clinical outcomes. The incision lengths were 5.14 ± 0.60 cm in the RARH group and 4.74 ± 0.55 cm in the TRRH (p < 0.001). The blood losses were 86.28 ± 52.57 mL in the RARH group and 69.19 ± 44.78 mL in the TRRH (p = 0.035). The operative times were 197.50 min (171.25-242.25) in the RARH group and 160.00 min (145.00-188.75) in the TRRH (p < 0.001). The postoperative hospital stays were 11.18 ± 4.32 days in the RARH group and 9.53 ± 4.42 days in the TRRH (p = 0.023). The NRS pain scores were 3.05 ± 0.23 in the RARH group and 2.96 ± 0.26 in the TRRH (p = 0.019). The abdominal drainage extraction times were 7.54 ± 1.44 days in the RARH group and 7.00 ± 1.25 days in the TRRH (p = 0.016). Postoperative complications in the RARH group are fewer than TRRH (p = 0.033). TRRH is safe and feasible. Compared with RARHs, the TRRHs resulted in shorter incision lengths, operative times, intraoperative blood losses, postoperative hospital stays, first flatus times, first liquid diet times, and drainage tube removal times, and they improved NRS pain scores and postoperative complication frequencies.