School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Vaccine. 2023 Jun 19;41(27):4027-4030. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.028. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
The "risk compensation hypothesis" holds that vaccinated individuals may be less motivated to protect themselves using other COVID-19 mitigation behaviors-e.g., masking, distancing and hand hygiene-given that they may perceive their infection risk to be lower. The current investigation provides an empirical test of the risk compensation hypothesis in the COVID-19 context using prospective data from the Canadian COVID-19 Experiences Survey (CCES). The survey comprised 1,958 unvaccinated and fully vaccinated individuals drawn from a representative sample, using quota sampling to ensure substantial representation of unvaccinated individuals. Two waves of data were collected 6 months apart. Findings revealed that vaccinated individuals performed COVID-19 mitigation behaviors significantly more frequently than their unvaccinated counterparts, and they also showed lower rates of attenuation as the pandemic continued. In summary, our findings do not support the risk compensation hypothesis; instead they support the notion that people adopt vaccination and other protective behaviors in parallel.
“风险补偿假说”认为,接种疫苗的个体可能不太愿意通过其他 COVID-19 缓解行为来保护自己,例如戴口罩、保持距离和手部卫生,因为他们可能认为自己的感染风险较低。本研究使用来自加拿大 COVID-19 体验调查 (CCES) 的前瞻性数据,在 COVID-19 背景下对风险补偿假说进行了实证检验。该调查使用配额抽样从代表性样本中抽取了 1958 名未接种疫苗和完全接种疫苗的个体,以确保未接种疫苗的个体得到充分的代表性。两次数据采集相隔 6 个月。研究结果显示,接种疫苗的个体比未接种疫苗的个体更频繁地采取 COVID-19 缓解行为,而且随着大流行的继续,他们的缓解行为也没有减弱。总之,我们的研究结果不支持风险补偿假说,而是支持人们同时采取接种疫苗和其他保护行为的观点。