• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有哪些方法可以提高主动脉夹层的诊断水平?

What can be done to improve diagnosis of aortic dissection?

机构信息

Joseph Epstein Centre for Emergency Medicine Research, Western Health, Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Medicine - Western Health, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2023 Feb;35(1):176-180. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14127. Epub 2022 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.14127
PMID:36336965
Abstract

Aortic dissection (AD) is rare. Missed AD is a common reason for coronial investigations and civil claims for medical negligence. Recommendations include improved education, supervision and information transfer, reminders in chest pain pathways and higher rates of investigation for AD. Higher investigation rates pose risks to patients and the health system which may not be in balance with the likelihood of AD. The appropriate diagnostic yield of investigation to balance risk and benefit has not been defined. The AD detection risk score pathway has been proposed as a useful diagnostic tool but concerns about its derivation, validation and utility remain. In this paper, we try to draw together published literature and local audit data to develop recommendations about what might be done to reduce the number of missed AD cases in EDs and what the impact of higher investigation rates might be.

摘要

主动脉夹层 (AD) 较为罕见。漏诊 AD 是尸检调查和医疗过失民事索赔的常见原因。建议包括改进教育、监督和信息传递、胸痛路径中的提醒以及更高的 AD 调查率。更高的调查率会给患者和医疗体系带来风险,而这些风险与 AD 的可能性可能并不平衡。尚未确定调查的适当诊断收益,以平衡风险和收益。AD 检测风险评分途径已被提议作为一种有用的诊断工具,但对其推导、验证和实用性仍存在担忧。在本文中,我们试图结合已发表的文献和本地审核数据,就如何减少急诊科漏诊 AD 的数量以及更高的调查率可能产生的影响提出建议。

相似文献

1
What can be done to improve diagnosis of aortic dissection?有哪些方法可以提高主动脉夹层的诊断水平?
Emerg Med Australas. 2023 Feb;35(1):176-180. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14127. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
2
What is the distribution of Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score in an undifferentiated emergency department chest pain population?在一个未分化的急诊科胸痛人群中,主动脉夹层检测风险评分的分布如何?
Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Oct;32(5):872-874. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13603. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
3
An easy miss: aortic dissection in a 'healthy' male.一个容易被漏诊的病例:一名“健康”男性的主动脉夹层。
BMJ Case Rep. 2017 Aug 7;2017:bcr-2017-221616. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-221616.
4
What Is the Specificity of the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score in a Low-prevalence Population?主动脉夹层检测风险评分在低发人群中的特异性如何?
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):632-638. doi: 10.1111/acem.13634. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
5
Diagnosis of acute thoracic aortic dissection in the emergency department.急诊科急性胸主动脉夹层的诊断
Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Jan;18(1):46-50. doi: 10.1016/s0735-6757(00)90047-0.
6
Misdiagnosis of aortic dissection: A systematic review of the literature.主动脉夹层误诊:文献系统回顾。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;53:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.11.047. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
7
Aortic dissection in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a series of two cases and a review of the literature.常染色体显性多囊肾病患者的主动脉夹层:两例病例系列及文献综述
Nephrology (Carlton). 2015 Apr;20(4):229-35. doi: 10.1111/nep.12373.
8
From ER to OR-Type A aortic dissection delay dilemma.从急诊室到手术室——A型主动脉夹层的延误困境
J Card Surg. 2021 Mar;36(3):1056-1061. doi: 10.1111/jocs.15280. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
9
Acute chest pain--suspected aortic dissection. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.急性胸痛——疑似主动脉夹层。美国放射学会。ACR适宜性标准。
Radiology. 2000 Jun;215 Suppl:1-5.
10
Use of heparin in aortic dissection: beware the misdiagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism.肝素在主动脉夹层中的应用:谨防急性肺栓塞的误诊。
BMJ Case Rep. 2013 May 2;2013:bcr2013009367. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-009367.

引用本文的文献

1
VENUM (Vascular Education iN Undergraduate Medicine): a multicentre evaluation of undergraduate vascular education in the UK.VENUM(血管医学本科生教育):英国多中心本科血管医学教育评估。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Nov;105(8):765-771. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0048.