• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病:现状与未来展望

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Present Status and Future Perspectives.

作者信息

Park Sangwoo, Park Seung-Jung, Park Duk-Woo

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, South Korea.

Department of Cardiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

JACC Asia. 2022 Mar 15;2(2):119-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.12.011. eCollection 2022 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.12.011
PMID:36339118
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9627854/
Abstract

For several decades, coronary artery bypass grafting has been regarded as the standard choice of revascularization for significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease. However, in conjunction with remarkable advancement of device technology and adjunctive pharmacology, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) offers a more expeditious approach with rapid recovery and is a safe and effective alternative in appropriately selected patients with LMCA disease. Several landmark randomized clinical trials showed that PCI with drug-eluting stents for LMCA disease is a safe option with similar long-term survival rates to coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, especially in those with low and intermediate anatomic risk. Although it is expected that the updated evidence from recent randomized clinical trials will determine the next guidelines for the foreseeable future, there are still unresolved and unmet issues of LMCA revascularization and PCI strategy. This paper provides a comprehensive review on the evolution and an update on the management of LMCA disease.

摘要

几十年来,冠状动脉旁路移植术一直被视为严重左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)疾病血运重建的标准选择。然而,随着设备技术和辅助药理学的显著进步,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)提供了一种恢复更快的更迅速的方法,并且对于适当选择的LMCA疾病患者而言是一种安全有效的替代方案。几项具有里程碑意义的随机临床试验表明,采用药物洗脱支架治疗LMCA疾病的PCI是一种安全的选择,其长期生存率与冠状动脉旁路移植手术相似,尤其是在解剖风险较低和中等的患者中。尽管预计近期随机临床试验的最新证据将决定可预见未来的下一套指南,但LMCA血运重建和PCI策略仍存在未解决和未满足的问题。本文对LMCA疾病的演变及管理进展进行了全面综述。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/9627854/68e364198203/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/9627854/68e364198203/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/9627854/09183fc29ecc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/9627854/20a8652dea1b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/9627854/93bef1bd59e6/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/9627854/e459eeb3676d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/9627854/68e364198203/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/9627854/68e364198203/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/9627854/09183fc29ecc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/9627854/20a8652dea1b/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/9627854/93bef1bd59e6/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/9627854/e459eeb3676d/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62e1/9627854/68e364198203/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Present Status and Future Perspectives.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病:现状与未来展望
JACC Asia. 2022 Mar 15;2(2):119-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.12.011. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
The Current State of Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的现状。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018 Jan 17;20(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11883-018-0705-2.
3
Intravascular ultrasound to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: an evidence-based analysis.血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(12):1-97. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
4
Prognostic Value of Sex After Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Disease: Extended PRECOMBAT Study.左主干冠状动脉疾病血运重建术后性别的预后价值:PRECOMBAT扩展研究
JACC Asia. 2021 Nov 9;2(1):19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.08.009. eCollection 2022 Feb.
5
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干狭窄患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1079-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2895.
6
Long-term outcomes after stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 10-year results of bare-metal stents and 5-year results of drug-eluting stents from the ASAN-MAIN (ASAN Medical Center-Left MAIN Revascularization) Registry.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病支架置入与冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结局:ASAN-MAIN(ASAN 医疗中心-左主干血运重建)注册研究中裸金属支架 10 年和药物洗脱支架 5 年的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Oct 19;56(17):1366-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.097.
7
The Cone Flare Crush Modified-T (CFCT) stenting technique for coronary artery bifurcation lesions.用于冠状动脉分叉病变的圆锥扩口挤压改良-T(CFCT)支架置入技术。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Sep 25;30:100643. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100643. eCollection 2020 Oct.
8
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease: one-year outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary artery intervention with drug-eluting stent.无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病治疗的随机对照试验的荟萃分析:冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的一年结局
J Card Surg. 2012 Mar;27(2):152-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2011.01410.x. Epub 2012 Feb 26.
9
Percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery disease an updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的比较:随机临床试验的最新荟萃分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 10;8(39):66449-66457. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20142. eCollection 2017 Sep 12.
10
Long-term trends of treatment effect of stenting or bypass surgery in patients with ostial or shaft left main coronary artery disease.开口部或主干左冠状动脉疾病患者支架置入术或旁路手术治疗效果的长期趋势。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 1;94(3):315-322. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28119. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term impact of diabetes on mortality in patients undergoing unprotected left main PCI: a propensity score-matched analysis from the BIA-LM registry.糖尿病对接受非保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者死亡率的长期影响:来自BIA-LM注册研究的倾向评分匹配分析
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Apr 21;24(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02733-5.
2
Risk Factors and Incidence for In-Stent Restenosis with Drug-Eluting Stent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.药物洗脱支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的危险因素及发生率:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 24;25(12):458. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512458. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
A Case Report of Coronary Artery Stenosis Induced by Ablation for Premature Ventricular Complexes.

本文引用的文献

1
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI 冠状动脉血运重建指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 18;79(2):e21-e129. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.006. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
2
Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的比较:一项个体患者数据分析荟萃研究。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2247-2257. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02334-5. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
3
一例因室性早搏消融导致冠状动脉狭窄的病例报告。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 18;16(10):e71764. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71764. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Sex Differences in Patients Undergoing Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Angina: Data From a National Registry.稳定型心绞痛患者行左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的性别差异:来自全国注册登记研究的数据。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 19;13(22):e036569. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036569. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
5
[Clinical outcomes of percutaneous intervention on the unprotected left main coronary artery].[非保护左主干冠状动脉经皮介入治疗的临床结果]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 Jan 8;62(1):1-8. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10278143.
6
State-of-the-art percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease in Japan.日本左主干冠状动脉疾病的最新经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Oct;39(4):386-402. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01030-4. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
7
Left main coronary artery disease: percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting? A critical review of current knowledge and contemporary debates.左主干冠状动脉疾病:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗还是冠状动脉旁路移植术?对当前知识和当代争论的批判性综述。
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2024 Jun;21(2):108-112. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2024.141149. Epub 2024 Jun 30.
8
Predictors of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后主要心脑血管不良事件的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04896-4.
9
Variability in research culture across busy catheterisation labs in the Asia-Pacific region.亚太地区繁忙的导管插入实验室之间研究文化的差异。
AsiaIntervention. 2024 Feb 29;10(1):26-33. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-23-00005. eCollection 2024 Feb.
10
Role of Intravascular Imaging in Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.血管内影像学在复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的作用:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Dec 1;208:143-152. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.09.070. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery surgery for left main disease according to lesion site: A meta-analysis.根据病变部位比较经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干病变的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jul;166(1):120-132.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.08.040. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
4
Improving Terminology to Describe Coronary Artery Procedures: JACC Review Topic of the Week.改善描述冠状动脉程序的术语:JACC 每周综述专题。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jul 13;78(2):180-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.010.
5
10-Year Follow-Up After Revascularization in Elderly Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease.老年复杂冠状动脉疾病患者血运重建后的 10 年随访。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 8;77(22):2761-2773. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.04.016.
6
The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN).欧洲分叉俱乐部左主干冠状动脉支架研究:分步临时与系统双支架策略的随机比较(EBC MAIN)。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Oct 1;42(37):3829-3839. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab283.
7
Long-Term Outcomes After PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease According to Lesion Location.根据病变位置,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的长期结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec 28;13(24):2825-2836. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.08.021.
8
Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary lesions: the 15 consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗分叉病变:来自欧洲分叉俱乐部的 15 项共识文件。
EuroIntervention. 2021 Mar 19;16(16):1307-1317. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00169.
9
Redevelopment and validation of the SYNTAX score II to individualise decision making between percutaneous and surgical revascularisation in patients with complex coronary artery disease: secondary analysis of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAXES trial with external cohort validation.SYNTAX 评分 II 的再开发和验证:用于指导复杂冠状动脉疾病患者经皮与手术血运重建策略的个体化选择:多中心随机对照 SYNTAXES 试验的二次分析及外部队列验证。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1399-1412. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32114-0. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
10
Revascularization in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction.左主干冠状动脉疾病伴左心室功能障碍患者的血运重建。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 22;76(12):1395-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.047.