• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[非保护左主干冠状动脉经皮介入治疗的临床结果]

[Clinical outcomes of percutaneous intervention on the unprotected left main coronary artery].

作者信息

Quintana-Ortiz Edgar Uriel, Bautista-López Germán Ramón, Bernal-Ruiz Enrique Alfredo, Solórzano-Vázquez Marco Alejandro, Hernández-Gonzále Martha Alicia, Solorio-Meza Sergio Eduardo

机构信息

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional del Bajío, Hospital de Especialidades No. 1, Servicio de Cardiología. León, Guanajuato, México.

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional del Bajío, Hospital de Especialidades No. 1, Servicio de Cardiología Intervencionista. León, Guanajuato, México.

出版信息

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 Jan 8;62(1):1-8. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10278143.

DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10278143
PMID:39110910
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12101864/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The debate on percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) has been constant over time.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical and procedural characteristics and cardiovascular outcomes of PCI of unprotected LMCA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Observational study which included patients with unprotected LMCA disease undergoing PCI; patients with cardiogenic shock prior to the procedure were excluded. We describe the clinical and angiographic characteristics, as well as the major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) according to the year of the procedure.

RESULTS

We included 73 patients, with a SYNTAX I score of 31.2 ± 9.1, mostly with ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (35%). There was a higher frequency of triple vessel coronary disease (63%) and distal LMCA lesions (35%). The provisional stent technique was the most used for distal lesions (58%) and the 2-stent technique for bifurcation lesions (78%), supported by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in 38%. During follow-up, 19 presented MACCE (26%), out of which cardiac death occurred in 13%, non-cardiovascular death in 5%, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction in 1%, cerebrovascular event in 2%, and revascularization of the treated vessel in 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

It was observed a similar frequency to the one appearing in other studies of cardiovascular events, mainly in patients with intermediate risk, which supports the increasing use of percutaneous intervention in this population.

摘要

背景

关于无保护左主干冠状动脉(LMCA)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的争论一直存在。

目的

探讨无保护LMCA的PCI的临床和手术特征及心血管结局。

材料与方法

观察性研究,纳入接受PCI的无保护LMCA疾病患者;排除术前出现心源性休克的患者。我们根据手术年份描述临床和血管造影特征,以及主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)。

结果

我们纳入了73例患者,SYNTAX I评分为31.2±9.1,大多数为ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(35%)。三支冠状动脉疾病(63%)和LMCA远端病变(35%)的发生率较高。临时支架技术最常用于远端病变(58%),双支架技术用于分叉病变(78%),38%的病例采用血管内超声(IVUS)辅助。随访期间,19例出现MACCE(26%),其中心脏死亡占13%,非心血管死亡占5%,非致命性急性心肌梗死占1%,脑血管事件占2%,治疗血管再血管化占4%。

结论

观察到心血管事件的发生率与其他研究相似,主要发生在中度风险患者中,这支持了在该人群中越来越多地使用经皮介入治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8a/12101864/092d1be765ba/04435117-62-1-e5628-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8a/12101864/6c26b2eef616/04435117-62-1-e5628-c001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8a/12101864/e21a7aec3b48/04435117-62-1-e5628-c002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8a/12101864/0e4bc35db8fc/04435117-62-1-e5628-c003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8a/12101864/8e12c0783e8c/04435117-62-1-e5628-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8a/12101864/59be12e219c5/04435117-62-1-e5628-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8a/12101864/092d1be765ba/04435117-62-1-e5628-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8a/12101864/6c26b2eef616/04435117-62-1-e5628-c001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8a/12101864/e21a7aec3b48/04435117-62-1-e5628-c002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8a/12101864/0e4bc35db8fc/04435117-62-1-e5628-c003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8a/12101864/8e12c0783e8c/04435117-62-1-e5628-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8a/12101864/59be12e219c5/04435117-62-1-e5628-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e8a/12101864/092d1be765ba/04435117-62-1-e5628-f003.jpg

相似文献

1
[Clinical outcomes of percutaneous intervention on the unprotected left main coronary artery].[非保护左主干冠状动脉经皮介入治疗的临床结果]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 Jan 8;62(1):1-8. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10278143.
2
Impact of 3-dimensional bifurcation angle on 5-year outcome of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery).三维分叉角度对左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 5 年预后的影响:SYNTAX 试验(紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏搭桥术的联合治疗)的一项亚组研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.009.
3
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
4
Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架置入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病后,冠状动脉解剖结构和支架技术对长期预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
5
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
6
Intravascular ultrasound to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: an evidence-based analysis.血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(12):1-97. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
7
10-Year Outcomes of Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.左主干冠状动脉疾病中支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术的 10 年结果比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 11;72(23 Pt A):2813-2822. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: a Hong Kong experience.非保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的特征与结果:香港经验
Hong Kong Med J. 2014 Jun;20(3):187-93. doi: 10.12809/hkmj134069. Epub 2014 May 9.
9
The anatomic- and clinical-based NERS (new risk stratification) score II to predict clinical outcomes after stenting unprotected left main coronary artery disease: results from a multicenter, prospective, registry study.基于解剖和临床的 NERS(新风险分层)评分 II 预测无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病支架置入后的临床结局:来自多中心、前瞻性登记研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1233-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
10
The Current State of Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的现状。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2018 Jan 17;20(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11883-018-0705-2.

本文引用的文献

1
[Atherogenic index and its association with acute coronary ischemic syndrome mortality].动脉粥样硬化指数及其与急性冠状动脉缺血综合征死亡率的关联
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2023 Sep 18;61(Suppl 2):S226-S232.
2
Contemporary Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A State-of-the-art Review.当代左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:最新综述
Interv Cardiol. 2023 May 26;18:e20. doi: 10.15420/icr.2023.02. eCollection 2023.
3
PCI or CABG for left main coronary artery disease: the SWEDEHEART registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病:SWEDEHEART 注册研究。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Aug 7;44(30):2833-2842. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad369.
4
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Left Main Disease in Patients With and Without Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗伴或不伴急性冠状动脉综合征的左主干病变患者:4 项随机临床试验的汇总分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Jul 1;8(7):631-639. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.1177.
5
Temporal Trends in In-Hospital Outcomes Following Unprotected Left-Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis of 14 522 Cases From British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database 2009 to 2017.非保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后院内结局的时间趋势:对英国心血管介入学会数据库2009年至2017年14522例病例的分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan;16(1):e012350. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012350. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
6
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Present Status and Future Perspectives.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病:现状与未来展望
JACC Asia. 2022 Mar 15;2(2):119-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.12.011. eCollection 2022 Apr.
7
A large, prospective, multicentre study of left main PCI using a latest-generation zotarolimus-eluting stent: the ROLEX study.一项使用最新一代佐他莫司洗脱支架进行左主干 PCI 的大型前瞻性多中心研究:ROLEX 研究。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Feb 6;18(13):e1108-e1119. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00454.
8
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI 冠状动脉血运重建指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e4-e17. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001039. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
9
Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: an individual patient data meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗联合药物洗脱支架与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病的比较:一项个体患者数据分析荟萃研究。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2247-2257. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02334-5. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
10
Coronary artery bypass grafting versus stent implantation in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and left main disease: insights from a register throughout Germany.慢性冠状动脉综合征合并左主干病变患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术与支架植入术的对比:来自德国全国注册登记研究的结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Jul;111(7):742-749. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01931-x. Epub 2021 Aug 28.