Goldberg Simon B
Department of Counseling Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Center for Healthy Minds, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Nat Rev Psychol. 2022 Oct;1(10):605-619. doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00090-8. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have entered mainstream Western culture in the past four decades. There are now dozens of MBIs with varying degrees of empirical support and a variety of mindfulness-specific psychological mechanisms have been proposed to account for the beneficial effects of MBIs. Although it has long been acknowledged that non-specific or common factors might contribute to MBI efficacy, relatively little empirical work has directly investigated these aspects. In this Perspective, I suggest that situating MBIs within the broader psychotherapy research literature and emphasizing the commonalities rather than differences between MBIs and other treatments might help guide future MBI research. To that end, I summarize the evidence for MBI efficacy and several MBI-specific psychological mechanisms, contextualize MBI findings within the broader psychotherapy literature from a common factors perspective, and propose suggestions for future research based on innovations and challenges occurring within psychotherapy research.
在过去的四十年里,基于正念的干预措施(MBIs)已进入西方主流文化。如今有几十种MBIs,它们得到了不同程度的实证支持,并且人们提出了各种特定于正念的心理机制来解释MBIs的有益效果。尽管长期以来人们一直承认非特定或共同因素可能有助于MBIs的疗效,但直接研究这些方面的实证工作相对较少。在这篇观点文章中,我认为将MBIs置于更广泛的心理治疗研究文献中,并强调MBIs与其他治疗方法之间的共性而非差异,可能有助于指导未来的MBI研究。为此,我总结了MBIs疗效的证据和几种特定于MBIs的心理机制,从共同因素的角度将MBIs的研究结果置于更广泛的心理治疗文献中,并根据心理治疗研究中出现的创新和挑战提出未来研究的建议。