Suppr超能文献

电子垃圾回收利用与健康益处:一项包含荟萃分析的系统文献综述

E-cycling and health benefits: A systematic literature review with meta-analyses.

作者信息

Riiser Amund, Bere Elling, Andersen Lars Bo, Nordengen Solveig

机构信息

Department of Sport, Food and Natural Sciences, Faculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sogndal, Norway.

Department of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.

出版信息

Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Oct 19;4:1031004. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1031004. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The objective of the present study is to review and meta-analyze the effect of E-cycling on health outcomes. We included longitudinal experimental and cohort studies investigating the effect of E-cycling on health outcomes. The studies were identified from the seven electronic databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cinahl and SportDiscus and risk of bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2). We performed meta-analysis with random effects models on outcomes presented in more than one study. Our study includes one randomized controlled trial, five quasi experimental trials and two longitudinal cohort studies. The trials included 214 subjects of whom 77 were included in control groups, and the cohort studies included 10,222 respondents at baseline. Maximal oxygen consumption and maximal power output were assessed in four and tree trials including 78 and 57 subjects, respectively. E-cycling increased maximal oxygen consumption and maximal power output with 0.48 SMD (95%CI 0.16-0.80) and 0.62 SMD (95%CI 0.24-0.99). One trial reported a decrease in 2-h post plasma glucoses from 5.53 ± 1.18 to 5.03 ± 0.91 mmol L and one cohort study reported that obese respondents performed 0.21 times more trips on E-bike than respondents with normal weight. All the included studies had a high risk of bias due to flaws in randomization. However, the outcomes investigated in most studies showed that E-cycling can improve health.

摘要

本研究的目的是回顾和荟萃分析电子骑行对健康结果的影响。我们纳入了调查电子骑行对健康结果影响的纵向实验和队列研究。这些研究是从七个电子数据库中识别出来的:科学网、Scopus、Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、Cinahl和SportDiscus,并使用修订后的Cochrane协作偏倚风险工具(RoB2)评估偏倚风险。对于在不止一项研究中呈现的结果,我们采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。我们的研究包括一项随机对照试验、五项准实验试验和两项纵向队列研究。这些试验包括214名受试者,其中77名被纳入对照组,队列研究在基线时包括10222名受访者。在四项试验中评估了最大摄氧量,其中包括78名受试者,在三项试验中评估了最大功率输出,其中包括57名受试者。电子骑行使最大摄氧量和最大功率输出分别增加了0.48标准化均数差(95%可信区间0.16 - 0.80)和0.62标准化均数差(95%可信区间0.24 - 0.99)。一项试验报告2小时后血浆葡萄糖从5.53±1.18毫摩尔/升降至5.03±0.91毫摩尔/升,一项队列研究报告肥胖受访者骑电动自行车出行的次数比体重正常的受访者多0.21倍。由于随机化存在缺陷,所有纳入的研究都有很高 的偏倚风险。然而,大多数研究调查的结果表明,电子骑行可以改善健康。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8292/9626861/062d6b17c414/fspor-04-1031004-g0001.jpg

相似文献

2
Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for cancer survivors.运动干预对癌症幸存者健康相关生活质量的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD007566. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007566.pub2.
6
Physical activity for women with breast cancer after adjuvant therapy.辅助治疗后乳腺癌女性的体育活动
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 29;1(1):CD011292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011292.pub2.
10
Promoting cycling: a review of interventions.促进自行车出行:干预措施综述。
Clin J Sport Med. 2011 Nov;21(6):542-4. doi: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000407931.13102.0b.

本文引用的文献

4
The impact of e-cycling on travel behaviour: A scoping review.电子自行车对出行行为的影响:一项范围综述。
J Transp Health. 2020 Dec;19:100910. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2020.100910. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
7
The effect of cycling on cognitive function and well-being in older adults.骑行对老年人认知功能和健康的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0211779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211779. eCollection 2019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验