• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

酒精使用障碍男性受试者概率性反转学习缺陷的计算分析

Computational analysis of probabilistic reversal learning deficits in male subjects with alcohol use disorder.

作者信息

Bağci Başak, Düsmez Selin, Zorlu Nabi, Bahtiyar Gökhan, Isikli Serhan, Bayrakci Adem, Heinz Andreas, Schad Daniel J, Sebold Miriam

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Katip Celebi University Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.

Department of Psychiatry, Midyat State Hospital, Mardin, Turkey.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 19;13:960238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.960238. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.960238
PMID:36339830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9626515/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alcohol use disorder is characterized by perseverative alcohol use despite negative consequences. This hallmark feature of addiction potentially relates to impairments in behavioral flexibility, which can be measured by probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) paradigms. We here aimed to examine the cognitive mechanisms underlying impaired PRL task performance in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUDP) using computational models of reinforcement learning.

METHODS

Twenty-eight early abstinent AUDP and 27 healthy controls (HC) performed an extensive PRL paradigm. We compared conventional behavioral variables of choices (perseveration; correct responses) between groups. Moreover, we fitted Bayesian computational models to the task data to compare differences in latent cognitive variables including reward and punishment learning and choice consistency between groups.

RESULTS

AUDP and HC did not significantly differ with regard to direct perseveration rates after reversals. However, AUDP made overall less correct responses and specifically showed decreased win-stay behavior compared to HC. Interestingly, AUDP showed premature switching after no or little negative feedback but elevated proneness to stay when accumulation of negative feedback would make switching a more optimal option. Computational modeling revealed that AUDP compared to HC showed enhanced learning from punishment, a tendency to learn less from positive feedback and lower choice consistency.

CONCLUSION

Our data do not support the assumption that AUDP are characterized by increased perseveration behavior. Instead our findings provide evidence that enhanced negative reinforcement and decreased non-drug-related reward learning as well as diminished choice consistency underlie dysfunctional choice behavior in AUDP.

摘要

背景

酒精使用障碍的特征是尽管存在负面后果仍持续饮酒。成瘾的这一标志性特征可能与行为灵活性受损有关,行为灵活性可通过概率性逆向学习(PRL)范式进行测量。我们旨在使用强化学习计算模型,研究酒精使用障碍患者(AUDP)PRL任务表现受损背后的认知机制。

方法

28名早期戒酒的AUDP患者和27名健康对照者(HC)进行了广泛的PRL范式实验。我们比较了两组之间选择的传统行为变量(持续性;正确反应)。此外,我们将贝叶斯计算模型拟合到任务数据中,以比较潜在认知变量的差异,包括奖励和惩罚学习以及两组之间的选择一致性。

结果

在逆转后的直接持续性比率方面,AUDP和HC没有显著差异。然而,与HC相比,AUDP的总体正确反应较少,特别是赢留行为减少。有趣的是,AUDP在没有或几乎没有负面反馈后表现出过早切换,但当负面反馈积累会使切换成为更优选择时,其停留倾向增加。计算模型显示,与HC相比,AUDP从惩罚中学习的能力增强,从正面反馈中学习的倾向降低,选择一致性较低。

结论

我们的数据不支持AUDP以持续性行为增加为特征的假设。相反,我们的研究结果表明,增强的负强化、减少的非药物相关奖励学习以及降低的选择一致性是AUDP功能失调选择行为的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a5/9626515/d87f156d08c0/fpsyt-13-960238-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a5/9626515/49119e924dda/fpsyt-13-960238-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a5/9626515/1e0ecb064f4e/fpsyt-13-960238-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a5/9626515/d87f156d08c0/fpsyt-13-960238-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a5/9626515/49119e924dda/fpsyt-13-960238-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a5/9626515/1e0ecb064f4e/fpsyt-13-960238-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12a5/9626515/d87f156d08c0/fpsyt-13-960238-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Computational analysis of probabilistic reversal learning deficits in male subjects with alcohol use disorder.酒精使用障碍男性受试者概率性反转学习缺陷的计算分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 19;13:960238. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.960238. eCollection 2022.
2
Association of Environmental Uncertainty With Altered Decision-making and Learning Mechanisms in Youths With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.环境不确定性与强迫症青少年决策和学习机制改变的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2136195. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.36195.
3
Perseveration and Shifting in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder as a Function of Uncertainty, Punishment, and Serotonergic Medication.强迫症中的固着与转换:作为不确定性、惩罚和5-羟色胺能药物作用的函数
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023 Jul 13;4(1):326-335. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.06.004. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Reduced sensitivity but intact motivation to monetary rewards and reversal learning in obesity.肥胖症患者对金钱奖励的敏感性降低,但动机和反转学习能力完好无损。
Addict Behav. 2023 May;140:107599. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107599. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
5
Effect of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) on reinforcement learning in humans.麦角酸二乙酰胺(LSD)对人类强化学习的影响。
Psychol Med. 2023 Oct;53(14):6434-6445. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722002963. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
6
Reward and punishment reversal-learning in major depressive disorder.重性抑郁障碍中的奖惩反转学习。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Nov;129(8):810-823. doi: 10.1037/abn0000641. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
7
Unique features of stimulus-based probabilistic reversal learning.基于刺激的概率性逆转学习的独特特征。
Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug;135(4):550-570. doi: 10.1037/bne0000474.
8
Comparison of conventional and rapid-acting antidepressants in a rodent probabilistic reversal learning task.常规抗抑郁药与速效抗抑郁药在啮齿动物概率性反转学习任务中的比较。
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2020 Feb 23;4:2398212820907177. doi: 10.1177/2398212820907177. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
9
Developmental Differences in Probabilistic Reversal Learning: A Computational Modeling Approach.概率性逆向学习中的发育差异:一种计算建模方法。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Jan 18;14:536596. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.536596. eCollection 2020.
10
Sustained MK-801 induced deficit in a novel probabilistic reversal learning task.在一项新颖的概率性逆向学习任务中,MK-801持续诱导出缺陷。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Oct 14;13:898548. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.898548. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic ethanol exposure produces sex-dependent impairments in value computations in the striatum.长期乙醇暴露会在纹状体的价值计算中产生性别依赖性损伤。
Sci Adv. 2025 Apr 4;11(14):eadt0200. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adt0200. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
2
Relevance of Probabilistic Reversal Learning for Adolescent Drinking Trajectories.概率性逆向学习与青少年饮酒轨迹的相关性。
Addict Biol. 2025 Mar;30(3):e70026. doi: 10.1111/adb.70026.
3
Dissociating social reward learning and behavior in alcohol use disorder.区分酒精使用障碍中的社会奖励学习与行为。

本文引用的文献

1
Computational models of exploration and exploitation characterise onset and efficacy of treatment in methamphetamine use disorder.计算模型的探索和开发特征的发病和疗效的治疗在甲基苯丙胺使用障碍。
Addict Biol. 2022 May;27(3):e13172. doi: 10.1111/adb.13172.
2
Computational theory-driven studies of reinforcement learning and decision-making in addiction: What have we learned?成瘾中强化学习与决策的计算理论驱动研究:我们学到了什么?
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021 Apr;38:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
3
Are methamphetamine users compulsive? Faulty reinforcement learning, not inflexibility, underlies decision making in people with methamphetamine use disorder.
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03236-3.
4
Alcohol, flexible behavior, and the prefrontal cortex: Functional changes underlying impaired cognitive flexibility.酒精、灵活行为与前额叶皮层:认知灵活性受损背后的功能变化
Neuropharmacology. 2024 Dec 1;260:110114. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.110114. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
5
Influence of reinforcement learning on the inhibitory control of Internet gaming disorder.强化学习对网络成瘾障碍抑制控制的影响。
Psych J. 2024 Dec;13(6):966-978. doi: 10.1002/pchj.772. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
6
Chronic Ethanol Exposure Produces Persistent Impairment in Cognitive Flexibility and Decision Signals in the Striatum.长期乙醇暴露会导致纹状体认知灵活性和决策信号持续受损。
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 25:2024.03.10.584332. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.10.584332.
7
Methylphenidate as a treatment option for substance use disorder: a transdiagnostic perspective.哌甲酯作为物质使用障碍的一种治疗选择:一种跨诊断视角
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Aug 3;14:1208120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1208120. eCollection 2023.
甲基苯丙胺使用者是否具有强迫性?在有甲基苯丙胺使用障碍的人群中,决策的基础是错误的强化学习,而不是不灵活性。
Addict Biol. 2021 Jul;26(4):e12999. doi: 10.1111/adb.12999. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
4
Probabilistic Reversal Learning Deficits in Patients With Methamphetamine Use Disorder-A Longitudinal Pilot Study.甲基苯丙胺使用障碍患者的概率性反转学习缺陷——一项纵向试点研究
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 9;11:588768. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.588768. eCollection 2020.
5
Decision-making inflexibility in a reversal learning task is associated with severity of problem gambling symptoms but not with a diagnosis of substance use disorder.在反转学习任务中,决策灵活性与赌博问题严重程度相关,与物质使用障碍诊断无关。
BMC Psychol. 2020 Nov 10;8(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00482-6.
6
Reward and punishment reversal-learning in major depressive disorder.重性抑郁障碍中的奖惩反转学习。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 Nov;129(8):810-823. doi: 10.1037/abn0000641. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
7
Decision-making (in)flexibility in gambling disorder.赌博障碍中的决策(不)灵活性
Addict Behav. 2021 Jan;112:106534. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106534. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
8
Imprecise action selection in substance use disorder: Evidence for active learning impairments when solving the explore-exploit dilemma.物质使用障碍中的不精确动作选择:在解决探索-利用困境时主动学习损伤的证据。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Oct 1;215:108208. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108208. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
Dopaminergic modulation of the exploration/exploitation trade-off in human decision-making.多巴胺对人类决策中探索/利用权衡的调节作用。
Elife. 2020 Jun 2;9:e51260. doi: 10.7554/eLife.51260.
10
Alcohol Use Disorder, But Not Cannabis Use Disorder, Symptomatology in Adolescents Is Associated With Reduced Differential Responsiveness to Reward Versus Punishment Feedback During Instrumental Learning.青少年的酒精使用障碍,但不是大麻使用障碍症状,与在工具性学习过程中对奖励与惩罚反馈的差异反应性降低有关。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020 Jun;5(6):610-618. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Feb 19.