• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨社会生态模型探索青少年约会暴力的风险和保护因素:综述的系统范围审查

Exploring risk and protective factors for adolescent dating violence across the social-ecological model: A systematic scoping review of reviews.

作者信息

Claussen Caroline, Matejko Emily, Exner-Cortens Deinera

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 20;13:933433. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.933433. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.933433
PMID:36339863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9630934/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adolescent dating violence (ADV) is a serious issue that affects millions of youth worldwide. ADV can be any intentional psychological, emotional, physical, or sexual aggression that occurs in adolescent dating and/or sexual relationships, and can occur both in person and electronically. The mental health consequences of ADV can be significant and far reaching, with studies finding long-term effects of dating violence victimization in adolescence. Preventing ADV so that youth do not experience negative mental health consequences is thus necessary. To be effective, however, prevention efforts must be comprehensive and address more than one domain of the social-ecological model, incorporating risk and protective factors across the individual level; relationship level; community level; and societal level. To support researchers and practitioners in designing such prevention programs, an understanding of what risk and protective factors have been identified over the past several decades of ADV research, and how these factors are distributed across levels of the social-ecological model, is needed.

METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We included peer-reviewed articles published in English between January 2000 and September 2020. The search strategy was developed in collaboration with a research librarian. Covidence was used for title and abstract screening and full text review. Data were extracted from included articles using a standardized charting template, and then synthesized into tables by type of factor (risk or protective), role in ADV (victimization or perpetration), and level(s) of the social-ecological model (individual, relationship, community, societal).

RESULTS

Our initial search across six databases identified 4,798 potentially relevant articles for title and abstract review. Following title and abstract screening and full text review, we found 20 articles that were relevant to our study objective and that met inclusion criteria. Across these 20 articles, there was a disproportionate focus on risk factors at the individual and relationship levels of the social-ecological model, particularly for ADV perpetration. Very little was found about risk factors at the community or societal levels for ADV victimization or perpetration. Furthermore, a very small proportion of articles identified any protective factors, regardless of level of the social-ecological model.

CONCLUSION

Despite best practice suggesting that ADV prevention strategies should be comprehensive and directed at multiple levels of an individual's social ecology, this systematic scoping review of reviews revealed that very little is known about risk factors beyond the individual and relationship level of the social-ecological model. Further, past research appears steeped in a risk-focused paradigm, given the limited focus on protective factors. Research is needed that identifies risk factors beyond the individual and relationship levels, and a strengths-based focus should be used to identify novel protective factors. In addition, a more critical approach to ADV research - to identify structural and not just individual risk and protective factors - is needed.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaae/9630934/742594014e57/fpsyt-13-933433-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaae/9630934/8c97defd122c/fpsyt-13-933433-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaae/9630934/742594014e57/fpsyt-13-933433-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaae/9630934/8c97defd122c/fpsyt-13-933433-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaae/9630934/742594014e57/fpsyt-13-933433-g002.jpg
摘要

背景

青少年恋爱暴力(ADV)是一个严重问题,影响着全球数百万年轻人。ADV可以是青少年恋爱和/或性关系中发生的任何故意的心理、情感、身体或性侵犯行为,并且可以通过面对面和电子方式发生。ADV对心理健康的影响可能很大且影响深远,研究发现青少年恋爱暴力受害会产生长期影响。因此,预防ADV以使年轻人不经历负面心理健康后果是必要的。然而,要想有效,预防工作必须全面,且要涉及社会生态模型的多个领域,纳入个体层面、关系层面、社区层面和社会层面的风险因素和保护因素。为了支持研究人员和从业者设计此类预防项目,需要了解在过去几十年的ADV研究中已确定的风险因素和保护因素,以及这些因素如何分布在社会生态模型的各个层面。

方法

本研究按照PRISMA指南进行。我们纳入了2000年1月至2020年9月期间以英文发表的同行评审文章。搜索策略是与一位研究馆员合作制定的。使用Covidence进行标题和摘要筛选以及全文评审。使用标准化图表模板从纳入的文章中提取数据,然后按因素类型(风险或保护)、在ADV中的作用(受害或施暴)以及社会生态模型的层面(个体、关系、社区、社会)进行综合制表。

结果

我们在六个数据库中的初步搜索确定了4798篇可能与标题和摘要评审相关的文章。经过标题和摘要筛选以及全文评审,我们发现20篇文章与我们的研究目标相关且符合纳入标准。在这20篇文章中,对社会生态模型的个体和关系层面的风险因素关注不成比例,特别是对于ADV施暴。关于ADV受害或施暴在社区或社会层面的风险因素发现得很少。此外,无论社会生态模型的层面如何,只有极小比例的文章确定了任何保护因素。

结论

尽管最佳实践表明ADV预防策略应全面且针对个人社会生态的多个层面,但对综述的这项系统范围综述显示,对于社会生态模型中个体和关系层面之外的风险因素知之甚少。此外,鉴于对保护因素的关注有限,过去的研究似乎深陷以风险为重点的范式。需要开展研究以确定个体和关系层面之外的风险因素,并且应以基于优势的重点来确定新的保护因素。此外,需要对ADV研究采取更批判性的方法——确定结构性而非仅仅是个体的风险和保护因素。

相似文献

1
Exploring risk and protective factors for adolescent dating violence across the social-ecological model: A systematic scoping review of reviews.跨社会生态模型探索青少年约会暴力的风险和保护因素:综述的系统范围审查
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 20;13:933433. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.933433. eCollection 2022.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Randomized controlled trials evaluating adolescent dating violence prevention programs with an outcome of reduced perpetration and/or victimization: A meta-analysis.评估以减少犯罪行为和/或受害情况为结果的青少年约会暴力预防项目的随机对照试验:一项荟萃分析。
J Adolesc. 2021 Feb;87:6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.12.009. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
5
Factors associated with youth gang membership in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家与青少年帮派成员身份相关的因素:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 29;14(1):1-128. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.11. eCollection 2018.
6
Secondary and Tertiary Prevention for Adolescent Dating Violence: A Systematic Review.青少年恋爱暴力的二级和三级预防:系统评价。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Dec;25(5):3938-3950. doi: 10.1177/15248380241265384. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
7
School-based interventions TO Prevent Dating and Relationship Violence and Gender-Based Violence: STOP-DRV-GBV systematic review.基于学校的干预措施预防约会和伴侣暴力及基于性别的暴力:STOP-DRV-GBV 系统评价。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Feb;12(3):1-192. doi: 10.3310/KTWR6997.
8
The National Prevalence of Adolescent Dating Violence in Canada.加拿大青少年约会暴力的全国流行率。
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Sep;69(3):495-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.01.032. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
9
Dating Violence Among Rural Adolescents: Perpetration and Victimization by Gender.农村青少年中的约会暴力:按性别划分的施暴与受害情况
J Interpers Violence. 2022 May;37(9-10):NP7729-NP7750. doi: 10.1177/0886260520971613. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
10
Prevalence and characteristics of three subtypes of dating violence among Danish seventh-grade students.丹麦七年级学生中三种约会暴力亚型的患病率及特征
Scand J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Psychol. 2018 Jul 10;6(1):16-27. doi: 10.21307/sjcapp-2018-004. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
What is a healthy dating relationship and what helps it get there? Perceptions of Chilean adolescents from a gender and inclusivity perspective.什么是健康的恋爱关系,以及如何促成这种关系?从性别和包容性角度看智利青少年的认知。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 24;16:1489208. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1489208. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychometric Properties of Instruments for Perpetration and Victimization of Dating Violence in Young People: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.青少年约会暴力实施与受害情况测量工具的心理测量特性:系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Mar 24;15(4):44. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15040044.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Canadian Adolescents' Experiences of Dating Violence: Associations with Social Power Imbalances.加拿大青少年的约会暴力经历:与社会权力失衡的关联。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jan;38(1-2):NP1762-NP1786. doi: 10.1177/08862605221092072. Epub 2022 May 20.
2
Prevalence of teen dating violence in Europe: A systematic review of studies since 2010.欧洲青少年恋爱暴力的流行情况:2010 年以来研究的系统综述。
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2021 Jul;2021(178):11-37. doi: 10.1002/cad.20437. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
3
'You Learn How to Hate': Adapting a Healthy Relationship Curriculum Using a Trauma-Informed Race Equity Lens.
Adolescent choices and caregiver roles: Understanding individual and interpersonal influences on sexual decision-making in South Africa.
青少年的选择与照顾者的角色:了解南非个体及人际因素对性决策的影响
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 9;4(12):e0003569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003569. eCollection 2024.
4
Prevalence and factors associated with the perpetration and victimization of teen dating violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.青少年约会暴力的发生率及其实施与受害相关因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
MethodsX. 2024 Oct 10;13:103003. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103003. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Profiles of socioemotional functioning in children with and without CPS-subtantiated maltreatment: Associations with child maltreatment and dating violence.有和没有 CPS 证实的虐待儿童的社会情感功能特征:与儿童虐待和约会暴力的关联。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Aug;154:106953. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106953. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
6
Teen dating violence and the COVID-19 pandemic: trends from a longitudinal study in Texas.青少年约会暴力与新冠疫情:德克萨斯州一项纵向研究的趋势
Inj Prev. 2024 Nov 21;30(6):481-487. doi: 10.1136/ip-2023-045115.
7
Canadian Adolescents' Experiences of Dating Violence: Associations with Social Power Imbalances.加拿大青少年的约会暴力经历:与社会权力失衡的关联。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Jan;38(1-2):NP1762-NP1786. doi: 10.1177/08862605221092072. Epub 2022 May 20.
“你学会了如何去恨”:采用创伤知情种族公平视角改编健康关系课程。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 21;18(18):9916. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189916.
4
The National Prevalence of Adolescent Dating Violence in Canada.加拿大青少年约会暴力的全国流行率。
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Sep;69(3):495-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.01.032. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
5
Male Perpetration of Adolescent Dating Violence: A Scoping Review.男性青少年恋爱暴力的实施:范围综述。
Am J Mens Health. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):1557988320963600. doi: 10.1177/1557988320963600.
6
The Role of Gender in Adolescent Dating Abuse: An Interpretive Meta-Synthesis of the Qualitative Literature.性别在青少年约会暴力中的作用:定性文献的解释性元分析。
Soc Work. 2020 Oct 10;65(4):335-348. doi: 10.1093/sw/swaa032.
7
Dating Matters and the Future of Teen Dating Violence Prevention.约会 Matters 及青少年约会暴力预防的未来
Prev Sci. 2021 Feb;22(2):187-192. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01169-5. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
8
Interpersonal Violence Victimization Among High School Students - Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2019.高中生人际暴力受害情况——美国 2019 年青年风险行为调查。
MMWR Suppl. 2020 Aug 21;69(1):28-37. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su6901a4.
9
What Works in Violence Prevention Among Young People?: A Systematic Review of Reviews.《青少年暴力预防的有效措施有哪些?——系统综述》
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022 Dec;23(5):1388-1404. doi: 10.1177/1524838020939130. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
10
A Meta-Analysis Linking Parent-to-Child Aggression and Dating Abuse During Adolescence and Young Adulthood.亲子攻击与青少年和青年时期约会暴力的元分析链接。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021 Dec;22(5):1248-1261. doi: 10.1177/1524838020915602. Epub 2020 Apr 7.