Predicting Hemodynamic Performance of Fontan Operation for Glenn Physiology using Computational Fluid Dynamics: Ten Patient-specific Cases.

Single ventricle hearts have only one ventricle that can pump blood effectively and the treatment requires three stages of operations to reconfigure the heart and circulatory system. At the second stage, Glenn procedure is performed to connect superior vena cava (SVC) to the pulmonary arteries (PA). For the third and most complex operation, called Fontan, an extracardiac conduit is used to connect inferior vena cava (IVC) to the PL and thereafter no deoxygenated blood goes to the heart. Predicting Hemodynamic Performance of Fontan Operation using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is hypothesized to improve outcomes and optimize this treatment planning in children with single-ventricle heart disease. An important reason for this surgical planning is to reduce the development of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVM) and the need to perform Fontan revisions. The purpose of this study was to develop amodel for Fontan surgical planning and use this model to compare blood circulation in two designed graft types of Fontan operation known as T-shape and Y-graft. The functionality of grafts was compared in terms of power loss (PL) and hepatic flow distribution (HFD), a known factor in PAVM development. To perform this study, ten single-ventricle children with Glenn physiology were included and a CFD model was developed to estimate the blood flow circulation to the left and right pulmonary arteries. The estimated blood flow by CFD was compared with that measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Results showed that there was an excellent agreement between the net blood flow in the right and left pulmonary arteries computed by CFD and CMR (ICC= 0.98, P-value ≥0.21). After validating the accuracy of each CFD model, Fontan operations using T-shape and Y-graft conduits were performed for each patient and the developed CFD model was used to predict the post-surgical PL and HFD. We found that the PL in the Y-graft was significantly lower than in the T-shape (P-value ≤0.001) and HFD was significantly better balanced in Y-graft compared to the T-shape (P-value=0.004).