Tang Elaine, Wei Zhenglun Alan, Fogel Mark A, Veneziani Alessandro, Yoganathan Ajit P
School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA.
Biology (Basel). 2020 Nov 24;9(12):412. doi: 10.3390/biology9120412.
Total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC) hemodynamics has been hypothesized to be associated with long-term complications in single ventricle heart defect patients. Rigid wall assumption has been commonly used when evaluating TCPC hemodynamics using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation. Previous study has evaluated impact of wall compliance on extra-cardiac TCPC hemodynamics using fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulation. However, the impact of ignoring wall compliance on the presumably more compliant intra-atrial TCPC hemodynamics is not fully understood. To narrow this knowledge gap, this study aims to investigate impact of wall compliance on an intra-atrial TCPC hemodynamics. A patient-specific model of an intra-atrial TCPC is simulated with an FSI model. Patient-specific 3D TCPC anatomies were reconstructed from transverse cardiovascular magnetic resonance images. Patient-specific vessel flow rate from phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the Fontan pathway and the superior vena cava under resting condition were prescribed at the inlets. From the FSI simulation, the degree of wall deformation was compared with in vivo wall deformation from phase-contrast MRI data as validation of the FSI model. Then, TCPC flow structure, power loss and hepatic flow distribution (HFD) were compared between rigid wall and FSI simulation. There were differences in instantaneous pressure drop, power loss and HFD between rigid wall and FSI simulations, but no difference in the time-averaged quantities. The findings of this study support the use of a rigid wall assumption on evaluation of time-averaged intra-atrial TCPC hemodynamic metric under resting breath-held condition.
全腔静脉肺动脉连接术(TCPC)的血流动力学被认为与单心室心脏缺陷患者的长期并发症有关。在使用计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟评估TCPC血流动力学时,通常采用刚性壁假设。先前的研究使用流固耦合(FSI)模拟评估了壁顺应性对心外TCPC血流动力学的影响。然而,忽略壁顺应性对可能更具顺应性的心房内TCPC血流动力学的影响尚未完全了解。为了缩小这一知识差距,本研究旨在探讨壁顺应性对心房内TCPC血流动力学的影响。使用FSI模型模拟了心房内TCPC的患者特异性模型。从横向心血管磁共振图像重建了患者特异性的3D TCPC解剖结构。在入口处规定了静息状态下经Fontan通路和上腔静脉的相位对比磁共振成像(MRI)获得的患者特异性血管流速。通过FSI模拟,将壁变形程度与相位对比MRI数据中的体内壁变形进行比较,以验证FSI模型。然后,比较了刚性壁模拟和FSI模拟之间的TCPC流动结构、功率损失和肝血流分布(HFD)。刚性壁模拟和FSI模拟之间在瞬时压降、功率损失和HFD方面存在差异,但在时间平均量方面没有差异。本研究结果支持在静息屏气状态下评估心房内TCPC血流动力学时间平均指标时使用刚性壁假设。