Kong Siu-Cheung, Yuen Cheuk-Nam
Department of Mathematics and Information Technology, Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Centre of Learning, Teaching and Technology, Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Heliyon. 2022 Oct 21;8(10):e11180. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11180. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Alternative assessment aims to increase the practicality and authenticity of assessment in university education and has been increasingly used during the pandemic. The implementation can be ineffective without considering students' needs and concerns in adapting to new assessment practices. This mixed-methods study applied an attitude-behaviour-context model to examine students' perceptions about the implementation of alternative assessment. One hundred and thirteen questionnaires were collected from students who experienced alternative assessment before the survey. Six students were interviewed about their learning experience. The quantitative results revealed that the students' perceived context of alternative assessment directly influenced their learning behaviour. The students' attitudes towards alternative assessment partially mediated the relationship between their perceived context of alternative assessment and their learning behaviour. The qualitative data were analysed using a deductive thematic approach, providing an in-depth interpretation of students' understanding and awareness of perceived teacher support and expectations about alternative assessment at the university. The semi-structured interview found that although students positively viewed the alternative assessment as an authentic task that help developing their higher-level thinking skills, the effectiveness of the assessment was weakened by the insufficient support and monotonous types of the assessment. This study's findings provide practical suggestions for teachers and universities to improve alternative assessment.
替代性评估旨在提高大学教育评估的实用性和真实性,并且在疫情期间得到了越来越广泛的应用。如果在适应新的评估方式时不考虑学生的需求和担忧,其实施可能会无效。这项混合方法研究应用了态度-行为-情境模型来考察学生对替代性评估实施的看法。从在调查前经历过替代性评估的学生中收集了113份问卷。对6名学生进行了关于他们学习经历的访谈。定量结果表明,学生对替代性评估的感知情境直接影响他们的学习行为。学生对替代性评估的态度部分中介了他们对替代性评估的感知情境与学习行为之间的关系。定性数据采用演绎主题法进行分析,深入解读了学生对大学中教师支持的感知以及对替代性评估的期望的理解和认识。半结构化访谈发现,尽管学生积极地将替代性评估视为有助于培养他们高级思维技能的真实任务,但评估的有效性因支持不足和评估类型单一而受到削弱。本研究的结果为教师和大学改进替代性评估提供了实用建议。