Suppr超能文献

创建评估作为一种主动学习策略:学生的看法是什么?一项混合方法研究。

Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students' perceptions? A mixed methods study.

机构信息

a Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology , University of Michigan Medical School , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.

出版信息

Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1630239. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1630239.

Abstract

: Teaching students how to create assessments, such as those involving multiple-choice questions (MCQs), has the potential to be a useful active learning strategy. In order to optimize students' learning, it is essential to understand how they engage with such activities. : To explore medical students' perceptions of how completing rigorous MCQ training and subsequently writing MCQs affects their learning. : In this mixed methods exploratory qualitative study, eighteen second-year medical students, trained in MCQ-writing best practices, collaboratively generated a question bank. Subsequently, the authors conducted focus groups with eight students to probe impressions of the process and the effect on learning. Responses partially informed a survey consisting of open-ended and Likert rating scale questions that the remaining ten students completed. Focus group and survey data from the eighteen participants were iteratively coded and categorized into themes related to perceptions of training and of collaborative MCQ writing. : Medical students felt that training in MCQ construction affected their appreciation for MCQ examinations and their test-taking strategy. They perceived that writing MCQs required more problem-solving and content-integration compared to their preferred study strategies. Specifically, generating plausible distractors required the most critical reasoning to make subtle distinctions between diagnoses and treatments. Additionally, collaborating with other students was beneficial in providing exposure to different learning and question-writing approaches. : Completing MCQ-writing training increases appreciation for MCQ assessments. Writing MCQs requires medical students to make conceptual connections, distinguish between diagnostic and therapeutic options, and learn from colleagues, but requires extensive time and knowledge base.

摘要

: 教授学生如何创建评估,如多项选择题 (MCQs),可能是一种有用的主动学习策略。为了优化学生的学习,了解他们如何参与此类活动至关重要。: 探讨医学生对完成严格的 MCQ 培训以及随后编写 MCQ 对学习的影响的看法。: 在这项混合方法探索性定性研究中,18 名接受过 MCQ 写作最佳实践培训的二年级医学生合作生成了一个题库。随后,作者对 8 名学生进行了焦点小组讨论,以探究他们对该过程的印象以及对学习的影响。部分回应为包含开放式和李克特量表问题的调查提供了信息,其余 10 名学生完成了该调查。对 18 名参与者的焦点小组和调查数据进行了迭代编码和分类,分为与培训和协作 MCQ 写作相关的看法的主题。: 医学生认为 MCQ 构建培训影响了他们对 MCQ 考试的欣赏以及他们的应试策略。他们认为,与他们喜欢的学习策略相比,编写 MCQ 需要更多的解决问题和内容整合。具体来说,生成合理的干扰项需要最关键的推理能力,以便在诊断和治疗之间做出细微区分。此外,与其他学生合作有助于接触不同的学习和问题写作方法。: 完成 MCQ 写作培训可以提高对 MCQ 评估的欣赏程度。编写 MCQ 要求医学生建立概念联系,区分诊断和治疗选择,并从同事那里学习,但需要大量的时间和知识基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c6d/6610530/3ed5fc2fca18/ZMEO_A_1630239_F0001_B.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验