• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类集体行为研究的蜂巢范式

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior.

作者信息

Boos Margarete, Pritz Johannes, Belz Michael

机构信息

Institute for Psychology, University of Goettingen;

Courant Research Centre Evolution of Social Behavior, University of Goettingen.

出版信息

J Vis Exp. 2019 Jan 19(143). doi: 10.3791/58719.

DOI:10.3791/58719
PMID:30735160
Abstract

Collective human behavior such as group movement frequently shows surprising patterns and regularities, such as the emergence of leadership. Recent literature has revealed that these patterns, often visible at the global level of the group, are based on self-organized, individual behaviors that follow several simple local parameters. Understanding the dynamics of human collective behavior can help to improve coordination and leadership in group and crowd scenarios, such as identifying the ideal placement and number of emergency exits in buildings. In this article, we present the experimental paradigm HoneyComb, which can be used to systematically investigate conditions and effects of human collective behavior. This paradigm uses a computer-based multi-user platform, providing a setting that can be shaped and adapted to various types of research questions. Situational conditions (e.g., cost-benefit ratios for specific behavior, monetary incentives and resources, various degrees of uncertainty) can be set by experimenters, depending on the research question. Each participant's motions are recorded by the server as hexagonal coordinates with timestamps at an accuracy of 50 ms and with individual IDs. Thus, a metric can be defined on the playfield, and movement parameters (e.g., distances, velocity, clustering, etc.) of participants can be measured over time. Movement data can in turn be combined with non-computerized data from questionnaires garnered within the same experiment setup. The HoneyComb paradigm is paving the way for new types of human movement experiments. We demonstrate here that these experiments can render results with sufficient internal validity to meaningfully deepen our understanding of human collective behavior.

摘要

诸如群体运动之类的人类集体行为常常呈现出惊人的模式和规律,比如领导力的出现。最近的文献表明,这些通常在群体全局层面可见的模式,是基于遵循几个简单局部参数的自组织个体行为。理解人类集体行为的动态变化有助于改善群体和人群场景中的协调与领导能力,比如确定建筑物中理想的紧急出口位置和数量。在本文中,我们介绍了实验范式HoneyComb,它可用于系统地研究人类集体行为的条件和影响。该范式使用基于计算机的多用户平台,提供一个可以根据各种研究问题进行塑造和调整的环境。实验者可以根据研究问题设置情境条件(例如,特定行为的成本效益比、金钱激励和资源、不同程度的不确定性)。服务器会以50毫秒的精度和个体ID将每个参与者的动作记录为六边形坐标并带有时间戳。因此,可以在游戏场上定义一个度量标准,并且可以随时间测量参与者的运动参数(例如,距离、速度、聚类等)。运动数据又可以与在同一实验设置中通过问卷调查获得的非计算机化数据相结合。HoneyComb范式正在为新型人类运动实验铺平道路。我们在此证明,这些实验能够产生具有足够内部效度的结果,从而有意义地加深我们对人类集体行为的理解。

相似文献

1
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior.人类集体行为研究的蜂巢范式
J Vis Exp. 2019 Jan 19(143). doi: 10.3791/58719.
2
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm.集体信任游戏:基于 HoneyComb 范式的信任游戏的在线团体改编版。
J Vis Exp. 2022 Oct 20(188). doi: 10.3791/63600.
3
Leadership in moving human groups.推动人类群体前进的领导力。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2014 Apr 3;10(4):e1003541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003541. eCollection 2014 Apr.
4
Motivation in Team Exergames: Testing the Köhler Discrepancy Effect with a Software-Generated Partner During Plank Exercise.团队协作游戏中的动机:在平板支撑运动中使用软件生成的伙伴检验科勒差异效应。
Games Health J. 2021 Feb;10(1):57-62. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2020.0029.
5
Collective behavior.集体行为
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;1(3):412-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01038.x.
6
A Serious Games Platform for Cognitive Rehabilitation with Preliminary Evaluation.一个用于认知康复的严肃游戏平台及初步评估
J Med Syst. 2017 Jan;41(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s10916-016-0656-5. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
7
Resilience, tipping, and hydra effects in public health: emergent collective behavior in two agent-based models.公共卫生中的恢复力、临界点和九头蛇效应:基于主体的两种模型中的涌现集体行为
BMC Public Health. 2016 Mar 15;16:265. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2938-8.
8
Real behavior in virtual environments: psychology experiments in a simple virtual-reality paradigm using video games.真实行为在虚拟环境中:使用视频游戏的简单虚拟现实范式中的心理学实验。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2010 Dec;13(6):711-4. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2009.0310. Epub 2010 May 11.
9
Behavior pattern (innate action) of individuals in fish schools generating efficient collective evasion from predation.鱼群中个体的行为模式(先天行为)产生了有效的集体逃避捕食行为。
J Theor Biol. 2005 Jul 21;235(2):153-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.12.025. Epub 2005 Feb 23.
10
Conflict and coordination in the provision of public goods: a conceptual analysis of continuous and step-level games.公共物品供给中的冲突与协调:连续与阶段性博弈的概念分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Nov;14(4):385-401. doi: 10.1177/1088868310368535. Epub 2010 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
In no uncertain terms: Group cohesion did not affect exploration and group decision making under low uncertainty.毫不含糊地说:在低不确定性情况下,群体凝聚力并未影响探索和群体决策。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 25;14:1038262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1038262. eCollection 2023.
2
How collective reward structure impedes group decision making: An experimental study using the HoneyComb paradigm.集体奖励结构如何阻碍群体决策:使用 HoneyComb 范式的实验研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 16;16(11):e0259963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259963. eCollection 2021.