• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有损失评估的N人信任博弈中信任的演变

Evolution of trust in N-player trust games with loss assessment.

作者信息

Liu Yuyuan, Wang Lichen, Guo Ruqiang, Hua Shijia, Liu Linjie, Zhang Liang

机构信息

College of Science, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China.

出版信息

Chaos. 2024 Sep 1;34(9). doi: 10.1063/5.0228886.

DOI:10.1063/5.0228886
PMID:39226477
Abstract

Trust plays a crucial role in social and economic interactions, serving as the foundation for social stability and human cooperation. Previous studies have explored the evolution of trust between investors and trustees by constructing trust game models, incorporating factors such as network structure, reputation, and incentives. However, these studies often assume that investors consistently maintain their investment behavior, neglecting the potential influence of the investment environment on investment behavior. To address this gap, we introduce a loss assessment mechanism and construct a trust game model. Specifically, investors first allocate their investment amount to an assessment agency, which divides the amount into two parts according to a certain allocation ratio. One part is used for investment assessment, and the results are fed back to the investors. If the payoff from this portion exceeds the investors' expected value, the remaining amount is invested; otherwise, it is returned to the investors. The results indicate that investors with moderate expectations are more likely to form alliances with trustworthy trustees, thereby effectively promoting the evolution of trust. Conversely, lower or higher expectations yield opposite results. Additionally, we find that as investors' expected values increase, the corresponding allocation ratio should also increase to achieve higher payoffs.

摘要

信任在社会和经济互动中起着至关重要的作用,是社会稳定和人类合作的基础。以往的研究通过构建信任博弈模型,纳入网络结构、声誉和激励等因素,探讨了投资者与受托人之间信任的演变。然而,这些研究往往假设投资者始终保持其投资行为,而忽略了投资环境对投资行为的潜在影响。为了弥补这一差距,我们引入了损失评估机制并构建了一个信任博弈模型。具体而言,投资者首先将其投资额分配给一个评估机构,该机构根据一定的分配比例将该金额分为两部分。一部分用于投资评估,结果反馈给投资者。如果这部分的收益超过投资者的预期值,则将剩余金额进行投资;否则,将其返还给投资者。结果表明,预期适中的投资者更有可能与值得信赖的受托人结成联盟,从而有效地促进信任的演变。相反,较低或较高的预期会产生相反的结果。此外,我们发现随着投资者预期值的增加,相应的分配比例也应增加,以实现更高的收益。

相似文献

1
Evolution of trust in N-player trust games with loss assessment.具有损失评估的N人信任博弈中信任的演变
Chaos. 2024 Sep 1;34(9). doi: 10.1063/5.0228886.
2
You have my word: reciprocity expectation modulates feedback-related negativity in the trust game.我向你保证:互惠期望会调节信任博弈中与反馈相关的负性情绪。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 26;10(2):e0119129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119129. eCollection 2015.
3
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm.集体信任游戏:基于 HoneyComb 范式的信任游戏的在线团体改编版。
J Vis Exp. 2022 Oct 20(188). doi: 10.3791/63600.
4
Trust and trustworthiness in young and older adults.年轻人和老年人中的信任与可信赖性。
Psychol Aging. 2015 Dec;30(4):977-86. doi: 10.1037/a0039736. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
5
Investment and repayment in a trust game after ventromedial prefrontal damage.腹内侧前额叶损伤后信托游戏中的投资与回报。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 25;7:593. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00593. eCollection 2013.
6
Coevolution of trustful buyers and cooperative sellers in the trust game.信任博弈中信任买家和合作卖家的共同进化。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044169. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
7
Institutional investors' site visits and investment-cash flow sensitivity: Mitigating financing constraints or inhibiting agent conflicts?机构投资者的实地调研与投资-现金流敏感性:缓解融资约束还是抑制代理冲突?
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0300332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300332. eCollection 2024.
8
An intermediary enhances out-group trust and in-group profit expectation of Chinese but not Australians.中介会增强中国人对群体外的信任和对群体内的利润期望,但不会增强澳大利亚人的。
Int J Psychol. 2017 Jun;52(3):189-196. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12199. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
9
Age-related similarities and differences in first impressions of trustworthiness.年龄相关的信任第一印象的相似性和差异性。
Cogn Emot. 2016 Aug;30(5):1017-26. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1039493. Epub 2015 May 28.
10
The Impact of Firm's Unethical Behavior in Investment Decisions Among Young Investors in China.企业不道德行为对中国年轻投资者投资决策的影响
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Nov 28;15:3427-3443. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S384377. eCollection 2022.