• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sex differences in symptomatology in people with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders: protocol for a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of observational studies.精神分裂症及其他精神障碍患者症状学中的性别差异:观察性研究的系统评价和成对荟萃分析方案
BJPsych Open. 2022 Nov 8;8(6):e194. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.596.
2
Psychological interventions for positive symptoms in schizophrenia: protocol for a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.精神分裂症阳性症状的心理干预:一项随机对照试验网络荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 14;8(3):e019280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019280.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Cancer and central nervous system disorders: protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and updated meta-analyses of observational studies.癌症与中枢神经系统疾病:观察性研究的系统评价及更新的荟萃分析的伞形综述方案
Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 4;6(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0466-y.
5
Assessment of the association of plant-based diets with cardiovascular disease risk profile in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.非洲以植物性饮食与心血管疾病风险状况关联的评估:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 1;10(6):e036792. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036792.
6
Acute interventions for aggression and agitation in psychosis: study protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.急性干预精神分裂症激越和躁动的研究方案:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 10;9(10):e032726. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032726.
7
Risk factors for mental illness in adults with atopic eczema or psoriasis: protocol for a systematic review.特应性皮炎或银屑病成人患者精神疾病发病风险因素的系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 28;10(12):e038324. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038324.
8
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信:职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
9
Effects of neurofeedback versus methylphenidate for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials.神经反馈与哌甲酯治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍的效果:一项针对直接比较试验的系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(39):e12623. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012623.
10
Prevalence and correlates of mental and neurodevelopmental symptoms and disorders among deaf children and adolescents: a systematic review protocol.聋童和青少年的精神和神经发育症状和障碍的患病率及其相关因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 29;10(10):e038431. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038431.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring identity and personal meanings in psychosis using the repertory grid technique: A systematic review.运用纲要分解技术探索精神分裂症中的身份认同和个人意义:系统综述。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2019 Nov;26(6):717-733. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2394. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
2
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Recovery Educational Interventions for Mental Health Professionals.一项针对心理健康专业人员的康复教育干预的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019 Nov;46(6):724-752. doi: 10.1007/s10488-019-00956-9.
3
Does Gender Influence Outcome in Schizophrenia?性别是否会影响精神分裂症的结局?
Psychiatr Q. 2019 Mar;90(1):173-184. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9619-y.
4
Sex and gender differences in schizophrenic psychoses-a critical review.精神分裂症中的性别差异——批判性综述。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018 Dec;21(6):627-648. doi: 10.1007/s00737-018-0847-9.
5
Why sex differences in schizophrenia?精神分裂症为何存在性别差异?
J Transl Neurosci (Beijing). 2016 Sep;1(1):37-42.
6
Randomized control trial to assess the efficacy of metacognitive training compared with a psycho-educational group in people with a recent-onset psychosis.一项随机对照试验,旨在评估元认知训练与心理教育组相比,对近期发病的精神病患者的疗效。
Psychol Med. 2017 Jul;47(9):1573-1584. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716003421. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
7
Gender-neutral mental health research is sex and gender biased.无性别倾向的心理健康研究存在性别偏见。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;4(1):9-11. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30209-7. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
8
A systematic review comparing sex differences in cognitive function in schizophrenia and in rodent models for schizophrenia, implications for improved therapeutic strategies.一项系统综述比较了精神分裂症患者和精神分裂症啮齿动物模型中认知功能的性别差异,及其对改进治疗策略的影响。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Sep;68:979-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.029. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
9
Contribution of sex hormones to gender differences in schizophrenia: A review.性激素对精神分裂症性别差异的影响:综述
Asian J Psychiatr. 2015 Dec;18:2-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
10
Gender differences in individuals at high-risk of psychosis: a comprehensive literature review.精神病高危个体中的性别差异:一项综合文献综述。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:430735. doi: 10.1155/2015/430735. Epub 2015 Jan 1.

精神分裂症及其他精神障碍患者症状学中的性别差异:观察性研究的系统评价和成对荟萃分析方案

Sex differences in symptomatology in people with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders: protocol for a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of observational studies.

作者信息

Ferrer-Quintero Marta, Verdaguer-Rodriguez Marina, Esteban Sanjusto Marina, Serra-Arumí Clara, Usall Judith, Ochoa Susana, Bighelli Irene, García-Mieres Helena

机构信息

Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain; and Departament de Psicología Social i Quantitativa, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.

Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BJPsych Open. 2022 Nov 8;8(6):e194. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.596.

DOI:10.1192/bjo.2022.596
PMID:36345720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9707498/
Abstract

Sex differences in symptomatology in people with psychosis have been studied extensively in recent decades. Although studies have pointed to such differences, to date there is no review that has performed a systematic search and quantitative synthesis. In this paper, we describe the protocol for a pairwise meta-analysis comparing a range of symptom outcome measures between men and women diagnosed with a psychotic spectrum disorder at different stages of the disorder (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021264942). In August 2021 we conducted systematic searches of PsychInfo, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Dialnet to identify observational studies that report data on symptoms for males and females separately. Two independent reviewers will conduct literature searches, select studies, extract data, assess the risk of bias and assess outcome quality. To assess the effect size of all outcome measures, we will conduct pairwise meta-analysis using random-effects models. The quality of studies will be evaluated using a National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's quality assessment tool and the confidence in the results will be evaluated using the GRADE tool. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. No ethical problems are foreseen. Results from this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences.

摘要

近几十年来,人们对精神病患者症状学方面的性别差异进行了广泛研究。尽管已有研究指出了这些差异,但迄今为止,尚无综述进行系统检索和定量综合分析。在本文中,我们描述了一项成对荟萃分析的方案,该分析旨在比较在精神谱系障碍不同阶段被诊断的男性和女性之间一系列症状结局指标(PROSPERO注册号CRD42021264942)。2021年8月,我们对PsychInfo、PubMed、科学网、Scopus和Dialnet进行了系统检索,以识别分别报告男性和女性症状数据的观察性研究。两名独立评审员将进行文献检索、选择研究、提取数据、评估偏倚风险并评估结局质量。为了评估所有结局指标的效应大小,我们将使用随机效应模型进行成对荟萃分析。研究质量将使用美国国立心肺血液研究所的质量评估工具进行评估,结果的可信度将使用GRADE工具进行评估。将进行荟萃回归和敏感性分析,以评估研究结果的稳健性。预计不会出现伦理问题。本研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊上,并在相关会议上展示。