Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Argentina.
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2022;54(4):320-333. doi: 10.5114/ait.2022.120673.
Thirty years ago, the traditional approach to mechanical ventilation consisted of the normalization of PaCO2 and pH at the expense of using a tidal volume (VT) of 10-15 mL kg-1. But then, the use of 6-8 mL kg-1 became a dogma for ventilating patients either with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or without lung disease in the operating theatre. It is currently recognized that even low tidal volumes may be excessive for some patients and insufficient for others, depending on its distribution in the aerated lung parenchyma. To carry out intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation, medical literature has focused on positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), plateau pressure (Paw plateau), and airway driving pressure (ΔPaw). However, considering its limitations, other parameters have emerged that represent a better reflection of isolated lung stress, such as transpulmonary pressure (PL) and transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔPL). These parameters are less generalized in clinical practice due to the requirement of an oeso-phageal balloon for their measurement and therefore their cumbersome application in the operating theatre. However, its study helps in the interpretation of the rest of the ventilator pressures to optimize intraoperative mechanical ventilation. This article defines and develops protective ventilation parameters, breaks down their determinants, mentions their limitations, and offers recommendations for their use intraoperatively.
三十年前,机械通气的传统方法是通过使用 10-15ml/kg 的潮气量来使 PaCO2 和 pH 正常化。但随后,使用 6-8ml/kg 的潮气量成为了手术室中患有急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)或无肺部疾病的患者进行通气的常规方法。目前人们认识到,即使是低潮气量对某些患者来说也可能过多,而对另一些患者来说则不足,这取决于潮气量在充气肺组织中的分布。为了实施术中保护性机械通气,医学文献主要关注呼气末正压(PEEP)、平台压(Paw plateau)和气道驱动压(ΔPaw)。然而,考虑到其局限性,出现了其他一些参数,这些参数能更好地反映孤立肺的压力,如跨肺压(PL)和跨肺驱动压(ΔPL)。由于这些参数的测量需要使用食管球囊,因此在临床实践中应用不够广泛,操作繁琐。然而,对这些参数的研究有助于解释呼吸机压力的其他方面,以优化术中机械通气。本文定义和发展了保护性通气参数,分解了其决定因素,提到了它们的局限性,并为术中使用提供了建议。