Baumgartner Kevin, Doering And Michelle, Mullins Michael E
Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2022 Dec;60(12):1356-1375. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2022.2138761. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist which is widely used for sedation. Dexmedetomidine does not suppress the respiratory drive and produces a state of cooperative sedation; it may be associated with beneficial outcomes in the general critical care population. The role of dexmedetomidine in the treatment of toxicologic conditions (excluding alcohol withdrawal) is unclear.
To critically assess and summarize the literature regarding the use of dexmedetomidine in toxicologic conditions other than alcohol withdrawal.
We performed a systematic review of the medical literature to identify all existing evidence regarding the use of dexmedetomidine for toxicologic conditions. We excluded reviews and commentary, studies reporting exclusively on alcohol withdrawal, and studies reporting the use of dexmedetomidine to treat iatrogenic sedative withdrawal in the intensive care unit. We also performed a review of the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) database for patients treated with dexmedetomidine.
We identified 98 studies meeting inclusion criteria; 87 of these were case reports or case series, representing 99 unique cases. Eleven articles with other designs were identified, which included 138 patients treated with dexmedetomidine for toxicologic conditions. Ninety-three cases from the ToxIC registry met inclusion criteria. Common indications for dexmedetomidine included stimulant intoxication, sedative withdrawal, serotonin syndrome, antimuscarinic toxidrome, opioid withdrawal, and cannabinoid intoxication. Dexmedetomidine was usually administered by continuous infusion; bolus administration was reported in a minority of cases. Adverse effects were uncommon. The quality of evidence was generally low, given the preponderance of case reports, the rate of missing or poorly reported data, and the near-universal co-administration of other sedatives.
Fifty-nine patients with stimulant poisoning were treated with dexmedetomidine. There was reasonably good evidence that dexmedetomidine was helpful in the treatment of stimulant poisoning.
Twenty-two patients with sedative withdrawal were treated with dexmedetomidine. Several case reports of very high-quality suggested efficacy of dexmedetomidine for this indication, particularly for baclofen withdrawal.
Twenty-six patients with serotonin syndrome were treated with dexmedetomidine. This evidence was of lower quality due to missing clinical details, potential overdiagnosis of serotonin syndrome, and near-universal concomitant treatment with other sedatives.
Forty-two patients with antimuscarinic poisoning were treated with dexmedetomidine. This evidence was of low quality and was limited by infrequent use of the preferred antidote, physostigmine.
Forty-four patients with opioid withdrawal were treated with dexmedetomidine. This evidence was of low quality due to missing clinical details and near-universal concomitant treatment with other agents. The one high-quality trial reported the use of dexmedetomidine in ultra-rapid opioid detoxification, which is not indicated in modern practice.
Five patients with cannabinoid intoxication were treated with dexmedetomidine. No definite conclusion can be drawn from the limited available evidence.
It is important to distinguish between the use of dexmedetomidine as a general sedative, which is likely to increase as the overall utilization of dexmedetomidine in critical care settings increases, and the use of dexmedetomidine as a specific pharmacologic treatment for a toxicologic condition. Well-established pharmacologic data from animal and human studies suggest dexmedetomidine counteracts stimulant-induced norepinephrine release. The mechanism by which dexmedetomidine treats sedative withdrawal is unclear. Some animal data show that dexmedetomidine may indirectly suppress serotonin release, which may suggest a role for dexmedetomidine in this condition.
There is a small and generally low-quality body of evidence which suggests that dexmedetomidine may be helpful in the treatment of certain toxicologic conditions, particularly stimulant intoxication and sedative withdrawal. Further high-quality research is needed to clarify the role of dexmedetomidine in patients with toxicologic conditions.
右美托咪定是一种α-2肾上腺素能受体激动剂,广泛用于镇静。右美托咪定不抑制呼吸驱动,可产生一种协同镇静状态;在一般重症监护人群中可能会带来有益的结果。右美托咪定在中毒情况(不包括酒精戒断)治疗中的作用尚不清楚。
严格评估和总结关于右美托咪定在除酒精戒断之外的中毒情况中应用的文献。
我们对医学文献进行了系统综述,以确定关于右美托咪定用于中毒情况的所有现有证据。我们排除了综述和评论、仅报告酒精戒断的研究以及报告在重症监护病房使用右美托咪定治疗医源性镇静剂戒断的研究。我们还对接受右美托咪定治疗的患者的毒理学研究联盟(ToxIC)数据库进行了综述。
我们确定了98项符合纳入标准的研究;其中87项为病例报告或病例系列,代表99例独特病例。我们还确定了11篇其他设计的文章,其中包括138例接受右美托咪定治疗中毒情况的患者。ToxIC登记处的93例病例符合纳入标准。右美托咪定的常见适应证包括兴奋剂中毒、镇静剂戒断、血清素综合征、抗毒蕈碱中毒、阿片类药物戒断和大麻中毒。右美托咪定通常通过持续输注给药;少数病例报告为推注给药。不良反应并不常见。鉴于病例报告占主导、数据缺失或报告不佳的比例以及几乎普遍联合使用其他镇静剂的情况,证据质量普遍较低。
59例兴奋剂中毒患者接受了右美托咪定治疗。有相当充分的证据表明右美托咪定有助于治疗兴奋剂中毒。
22例镇静剂戒断患者接受了右美托咪定治疗。几篇高质量的病例报告表明右美托咪定对该适应证有效,尤其是对巴氯芬戒断。
26例血清素综合征患者接受了右美托咪定治疗。由于临床细节缺失、血清素综合征可能存在过度诊断以及几乎普遍同时使用其他镇静剂,该证据质量较低。
42例抗毒蕈碱中毒患者接受了右美托咪定治疗。该证据质量较低,且因首选解毒剂毒扁豆碱使用不频繁而受到限制。
44例阿片类药物戒断患者接受了右美托咪定治疗。由于临床细节缺失以及几乎普遍同时使用其他药物,该证据质量较低。一项高质量试验报告了右美托咪定在超快速阿片类药物脱毒中的应用,而现代实践中并不推荐这种应用。
5例大麻中毒患者接受了右美托咪定治疗。根据有限的现有证据无法得出明确结论。
区分右美托咪定作为一般镇静剂的使用(随着其在重症监护环境中的总体使用增加,这种使用可能会增加)和作为中毒情况的特定药物治疗非常重要。来自动物和人体研究的确立的药理学数据表明,右美托咪定可抵消兴奋剂诱导的去甲肾上腺素释放。右美托咪定治疗镇静剂戒断的机制尚不清楚。一些动物数据表明,右美托咪定可能间接抑制血清素释放,这可能表明右美托咪定在这种情况下发挥作用。
有少量且总体质量较低的证据表明,右美托咪定可能有助于治疗某些中毒情况,尤其是兴奋剂中毒和镇静剂戒断。需要进一步的高质量研究来阐明右美托咪定在中毒患者中的作用。