• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 CNG 和 E10 燃料轻型车的 CO、NO 和 VOCs 排放。

Comparison of CO, NO, and VOCs emissions between CNG and E10 fueled light-duty vehicles.

机构信息

Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.

Tianjin Key Laboratory of Urban Transport Emission Research, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 1;858(Pt 2):159966. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159966. Epub 2022 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159966
PMID:36347281
Abstract

In China, natural gas (NG) is the main vehicle fuel after gasoline and diesel, and the number of NG vehicles ranks first in the world. At present, there are many studies on the conventional gaseous pollutants and particulate matter of NG vehicles, but very few studies on their VOCs. In this study, the chassis dynamometer is used to test CNG/E10 bi-fuel light-duty vehicles, analyze the advantages of CNG in CO, fuel thermal efficiency, and cost, and discuss its disadvantages in NO emission. Most importantly, the emission characteristics and ozone formation potential of VOCs in the exhaust of CNG vehicles were analyzed in the study. Compared with E10, CNG fuel can reduce CO emission by about 20 %, improve thermal efficiency by about 13 %, and save fuel costs by about 50 %. However, it will increase NO and NO emissions by about 10 % and 13 % respectively. As for VOCs, the emission factor of VOCs from CNG fuel is about 54 % of E10 fuel. The VOCs group with the highest proportion in the exhaust of CNG-fueled vehicles is alkanes, >80 %. while the alkanes and alkenes with the highest proportion in E10 fuel are 30 % and 23 % respectively. C2 VOCs emitted by CNG account for >70 %, while C2 VOCs emitted by E10 are <60 %, followed by C4 VOCs, about 10 % - 30 %. The OFPs of VOCs in CNG exhaust is about 13.7 % of E10. Alkenes contribute the most to ozone, and the OFPs of alkenes in CNG and E10 vehicle exhaust accounts for about 55.3 % and 78.8 % of TVOCs respectively. The results of this study are helpful to improve people's understanding of the environmental value of using NG vehicles.

摘要

在中国,天然气(NG)是继汽油和柴油之后的主要车辆燃料,NG 车辆的数量位居世界第一。目前,针对 NG 车辆的常规气态污染物和颗粒物已有很多研究,但对其挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的研究却很少。在本研究中,使用底盘测功机对 CNG/E10 双燃料轻型车进行了测试,分析了 CNG 在 CO、燃料热效率和成本方面的优势,并讨论了其在 NO 排放方面的劣势。最重要的是,本研究分析了 CNG 车辆尾气中 VOCs 的排放特征和臭氧形成潜力。与 E10 相比,CNG 燃料可将 CO 排放量减少约 20%,热效率提高约 13%,燃料成本降低约 50%。然而,它将分别增加约 10%和 13%的 NO 和 NOx 排放。对于 VOCs,CNG 燃料的 VOCs 排放因子约为 E10 燃料的 54%。在 CNG 燃料车辆尾气中排放比例最高的 VOCs 组是烷烃,>80%。而 E10 燃料中比例最高的烷烃和烯烃分别为 30%和 23%。CNG 排放的 C2 VOCs 占>70%,而 E10 排放的 C2 VOCs 则<60%,其次是 C4 VOCs,约为 10%-30%。CNG 尾气中 VOCs 的 OFP 约为 E10 的 13.7%。烯烃对臭氧的贡献最大,CNG 和 E10 车辆尾气中烯烃的 OFP 分别约占 TVOCs 的 55.3%和 78.8%。本研究的结果有助于提高人们对使用 NG 车辆的环境价值的认识。

相似文献

1
Comparison of CO, NO, and VOCs emissions between CNG and E10 fueled light-duty vehicles.比较 CNG 和 E10 燃料轻型车的 CO、NO 和 VOCs 排放。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 1;858(Pt 2):159966. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159966. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
2
Comparison of tailpipe carbonyls and volatile organic compounds emissions from in-use gasoline/CNG bi-fuel vehicles.在用汽油/CNG 两用燃料车的排气管羰基化合物和挥发性有机化合物排放的比较。
J Environ Sci (China). 2024 Jan;135:619-629. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2022.09.025. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
3
Exhaust and evaporative volatile organic compounds emissions from vehicles fueled with ethanol-blended-gasoline.车辆使用乙醇混合汽油时的排放废气和蒸发的挥发性有机化合物。
Environ Pollut. 2024 Sep 15;357:124163. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124163. Epub 2024 May 21.
4
Emissions of toxic pollutants from compressed natural gas and low sulfur diesel-fueled heavy-duty transit buses tested over multiple driving cycles.在多个驾驶循环中对压缩天然气和低硫柴油驱动的重型公交巴士的有毒污染物排放进行了测试。
Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Oct 1;39(19):7638-49. doi: 10.1021/es0491127.
5
Emission factors of air pollutants from CNG-gasoline bi-fuel vehicles: Part II. CO, HC and NOx.天然气-汽油双燃料车空气污染物排放因子:第二部分。CO、HC 和 NOx。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Sep 15;565:698-705. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.069. Epub 2016 May 21.
6
Emissions of nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds from liquefied petroleum gas-fueled taxis under idle and cruising modes.液化石油气出租车在怠速和巡航模式下氮氧化物和挥发性有机化合物的排放。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Dec;267:115623. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115623. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
7
Emission characteristics and ozone formation potentials of gaseous pollutants from in-use methanol-, CNG- and gasoline-fueled vehicles.在用甲醇、压缩天然气和汽油为燃料的车辆排放的气态污染物的排放特征及臭氧生成潜力
Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Mar 6;193(4):164. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-08951-0.
8
Comparison of the emission factors of air pollutants from gasoline, CNG, LPG and diesel fueled vehicles at idle speed.比较汽油、CNG、LPG 和柴油燃料车辆在怠速时的空气污染物排放因子。
Environ Pollut. 2022 Jul 15;305:119296. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119296. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
9
On-road mileage-based emission factors of gaseous pollutants from bi-fuel taxi fleets in China: The influence of fuel type, vehicle speed, and accumulated mileage.中国双燃料出租车车队气态污染物的道路行驶里程排放因子:燃料类型、车速和累积里程的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 May 1;819:151999. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151999. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
10
Emission factors of air pollutants from CNG-gasoline bi-fuel vehicles: Part I. Black carbon.天然气-汽油双燃料车空气污染物排放因子:第一部分:黑碳。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Dec 1;572:1161-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.027. Epub 2016 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The Actual Toxicity of Engine Exhaust Gases Emitted from Vehicles: The Development and Perspectives of Biological and Chemical Measurement Methods.车辆排放的发动机废气的实际毒性:生物和化学测量方法的发展与展望。
ACS Omega. 2023 Jul 3;8(28):24718-24726. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c02171. eCollection 2023 Jul 18.