• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

森林火灾驱动因素空间尺度预测模型:以中国云南省为例。

Predictive model of spatial scale of forest fire driving factors: a case study of Yunnan Province, China.

机构信息

Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming, 650500, China.

GIS Technology Engineering Research Centre for West-China Resources and Environment of Education-Al Ministry, Kunming, 650500, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 8;12(1):19029. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23697-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-23697-6
PMID:36348041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9643377/
Abstract

Forest fires are among the major natural disasters that destroy the balance of forest ecosystems. The construction of a forest fire prediction model to investigate the driving mechanism of fire drivers on forest fires can help reveal the mechanism of forest fire occurrence and its risk, and thus contribute to the prevention and control of forest fires. However, previous studies on the mechanisms of forest fire drivers have not considered the effect of differences in spatial scale of action of forest fire drivers on the predicted effect. Therefore, the present study proposes a spatial prediction model of forest fires that considers the spatial scale effect of forest fire drivers to predict forest fire risk. First, based on historical forest fire data and geographic environmental data in the Yunnan Province, geographically weighted logistic regression (GWLR) was used to determine the forest fire drivers and to estimate the probability of forest fire occurrence at locations where fire observations are absent. Then, multi-scale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) was used to explore the spatial scales of action of different drivers on forest fires. The results show that meteorological factors such as relative humidity, air temperature, air pressure, sunshine hours, daily precipitation, wind speed, topographic factors such as elevation, slope, and aspect, anthropogenic factors such as population density and road network, as well as vegetation type, were significantly correlated with forest fires; thus, they are identified as important factors influencing occurrence of forest fires in the Yunnan Province. The MGWR model regression results show that the role of different forest fire drivers on forest fire occurrence has spatial scale differences. The spatial scale of drivers such as altitude, aspect, wind speed, temperature, slope, and distance from the road to the fire point was larger and their spatial influence was relatively stable, with spatial heterogeneity having less influence on the model evaluation results. The spatial scale of drivers such as relative humidity, sunshine, air pressure, precipitation, population density, and vegetation type were smaller, and spatial heterogeneity had a more obvious influence on the model evaluation results. This study provides a reference for selecting drivers and evaluating their spatial scale effects to construct predictive regional forest fire models.

摘要

森林火灾是破坏森林生态系统平衡的主要自然灾害之一。建立森林火灾预测模型,研究火灾驱动因素对森林火灾的驱动机制,可以帮助揭示森林火灾发生的机制及其风险,从而有助于森林火灾的预防和控制。然而,以前关于森林火灾驱动因素的机制研究并没有考虑到森林火灾驱动因素的空间作用尺度对预测效果的影响。因此,本研究提出了一种考虑森林火灾驱动因素空间尺度效应的森林火灾空间预测模型,以预测森林火灾风险。首先,基于云南省历史森林火灾数据和地理环境数据,利用地理加权逻辑回归(GWLR)确定森林火灾驱动因素,并估计无火灾观测点的森林火灾发生概率。然后,利用多尺度地理加权回归(MGWR)探讨不同驱动因素对森林火灾的空间作用尺度。结果表明,相对湿度、气温、气压、日照时数、日降水量、风速等气象因素、海拔、坡度、坡向等地形因素、人口密度和路网等人为因素以及植被类型与森林火灾显著相关,是影响云南省森林火灾发生的重要因素。MGWR 模型回归结果表明,不同森林火灾驱动因素对森林火灾发生的作用具有空间尺度差异。海拔、坡向、风速、温度、坡度、距火点道路距离等驱动因素的空间尺度较大,空间影响较为稳定,空间异质性对模型评价结果的影响较小。相对湿度、日照、气压、降水、人口密度、植被类型等驱动因素的空间尺度较小,空间异质性对模型评价结果的影响较为明显。本研究为选择驱动因素和评价其空间尺度效应,构建预测性区域森林火灾模型提供了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/d917c54cbdac/41598_2022_23697_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/7b7bbdca495a/41598_2022_23697_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/7b9457de0344/41598_2022_23697_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/a0697ca254e4/41598_2022_23697_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/99ddea96f8b2/41598_2022_23697_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/553944e3d280/41598_2022_23697_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/4290c0d23b09/41598_2022_23697_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/a1e4f93368d9/41598_2022_23697_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/38fb31693046/41598_2022_23697_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/2e44014240e1/41598_2022_23697_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/9946500a9666/41598_2022_23697_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/d917c54cbdac/41598_2022_23697_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/7b7bbdca495a/41598_2022_23697_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/7b9457de0344/41598_2022_23697_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/a0697ca254e4/41598_2022_23697_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/99ddea96f8b2/41598_2022_23697_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/553944e3d280/41598_2022_23697_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/4290c0d23b09/41598_2022_23697_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/a1e4f93368d9/41598_2022_23697_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/38fb31693046/41598_2022_23697_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/2e44014240e1/41598_2022_23697_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/9946500a9666/41598_2022_23697_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e860/9643377/d917c54cbdac/41598_2022_23697_Fig11_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictive model of spatial scale of forest fire driving factors: a case study of Yunnan Province, China.森林火灾驱动因素空间尺度预测模型:以中国云南省为例。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 8;12(1):19029. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23697-6.
2
[Seasonal variation and driving factors of forest fire in Zhejiang Province, China, based on MODIS satellite hot spots].基于MODIS卫星热点的中国浙江省森林火灾季节变化及驱动因素
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2020 Feb;31(2):399-406. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202002.015.
3
[Applicability of mixed effect model in the prediction of forest fire].[混合效应模型在森林火灾预测中的适用性]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Jun;33(6):1547-1554. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202206.026.
4
[Drivers of human-caused fire occurrence and its variation trend under climate change in the Great Xing'an Mountains, Northeast China].[中国东北大兴安岭地区气候变化下人为火源发生的驱动因素及其变化趋势]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2017 Jan;28(1):210-218. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201701.037.
5
Understanding fire drivers and relative impacts in different Chinese forest ecosystems.了解不同中国森林生态系统中的火灾驱动因素及其相对影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 15;605-606:411-425. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.219. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
6
Forest fire probability under ENSO conditions in a semi-arid region: a case study in Guanajuato.半干旱地区厄尔尼诺-南方涛动(ENSO)条件下的森林火灾概率:以瓜纳华托为例
Environ Monit Assess. 2021 Oct 2;193(10):684. doi: 10.1007/s10661-021-09494-0.
7
[Prediction model of human-caused fire occurrence in the boreal forest of northern China].[中国北方寒温带森林人为火灾发生预测模型]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2015 Jul;26(7):2099-106.
8
Integrating meteorological and geospatial data for forest fire risk assessment.整合气象和地理空间数据进行森林火灾风险评估。
J Environ Manage. 2024 May;358:120925. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120925. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
9
[A review of models of forest fire occurrence prediction in China].[中国森林火灾发生预测模型综述]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2020 Sep 15;31(9):3227-3240. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202009.014.
10
Spatiotemporal dynamics of forest fires in the context of climate change: a review.气候变化背景下森林火灾的时空动态:综述
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Apr 25. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33305-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling susceptibility to forest fires in the Central Corridor of the Atlantic Forest using the frequency ratio method.利用频率比法对大西洋森林中部走廊的森林火灾易感性进行建模。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Oct 15;296:113343. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113343. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
2
Sociodemographic determinants of COVID-19 incidence rates in Oman: Geospatial modelling using multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR).阿曼新冠肺炎发病率的社会人口学决定因素:使用多尺度地理加权回归(MGWR)的地理空间建模
Sustain Cities Soc. 2021 Feb;65:102627. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102627. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
3
GIS-based spatial modeling of COVID-19 incidence rate in the continental United States.
基于 GIS 的美国大陆 COVID-19 发病率空间建模。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 1;728:138884. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138884. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
4
Application of learning vector quantization and different machine learning techniques to assessing forest fire influence factors and spatial modelling.学习矢量量化及其不同机器学习技术在评估森林火灾影响因素和空间建模中的应用。
Environ Res. 2020 May;184:109321. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109321. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
5
Predicting forest fire kernel density at multiple scales with geographically weighted regression in Mexico.利用地理加权回归在墨西哥对多个尺度的森林火灾核密度进行预测。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 20;718:137313. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137313. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
6
Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013.1979年至2013年气候引发的全球野火危险变化
Nat Commun. 2015 Jul 14;6:7537. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8537.
7
Trends and causes of severity, size, and number of fires in northwestern California, USA.美国加利福尼亚州西北部火灾严重程度、规模和数量的趋势和原因。
Ecol Appl. 2012 Jan;22(1):184-203. doi: 10.1890/10-2108.1.
8
Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. forest wildfire activity.气候变暖以及春季提前致使美国西部森林野火活动增加。
Science. 2006 Aug 18;313(5789):940-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1128834. Epub 2006 Jul 6.
9
Estimation of the Youden Index and its associated cutoff point.尤登指数及其相关截断点的估计。
Biom J. 2005 Aug;47(4):458-72. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200410135.