• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适应和研究方案的循证制作更好的选择 (MBC2) 多种饮食和活动改变干预为农村阿巴拉契亚人口。

Adaptation and study protocol of the evidence-based Make Better Choices (MBC2) multiple diet and activity change intervention for a rural Appalachian population.

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, 760 Press Avenue, 468 Healthy Kentucky Research Building, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):2043. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14475-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-14475-0
PMID:36348358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9643925/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rural Appalachian residents experience among the highest prevalence of chronic disease, premature mortality, and decreased life expectancy in the nation. Addressing these growing inequities while avoiding duplicating existing programming necessitates the development of appropriate adaptations of evidence-based lifestyle interventions. Yet few published articles explicate how to accomplish such contextual and cultural adaptation.

METHODS

In this paper, we describe the process of adapting the Make Better Choices 2 (MBC2) mHealth diet and activity randomized trial and the revised protocol for intervention implementation in rural Appalachia. Deploying the NIH's Cultural Framework on Health and Aaron's Adaptation framework, the iterative adaptation process included convening focus groups (N = 4, 38 participants), conducting key informant interviews (N = 16), verifying findings with our Community Advisory Board (N = 9), and deploying usability surveys (N = 8), wireframing (N = 8), and pilot testing (N = 9. This intense process resulted in a comprehensive revision of recruitment, retention, assessment, and intervention components. For the main trial, 350 participants will be randomized to receive either the multicomponent MBC2 diet and activity intervention or an active control condition (stress and sleep management). The main outcome is a composite score of four behavioral outcomes: two outcomes related to diet (increased fruits and vegetables and decreased saturated fat intake) and two related to activity (increased moderate vigorous physical activity [MVPA] and decreased time spent on sedentary activities). Secondary outcomes include change in biomarkers, including blood pressure, lipids, A1C, waist circumference, and BMI.

DISCUSSION

Adaptation and implementation of evidence-based interventions is necessary to ensure efficacious contextually and culturally appropriate health services and programs, particularly for underserved and vulnerable populations. This article describes the development process of an adapted, community-embedded health intervention and the final protocol created to improve health behavior and, ultimately, advance health equity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04309461. The trial was registered on 6/3/2020.

摘要

背景

美国阿巴拉契亚农村居民所患慢性病、早逝和预期寿命缩短的比例位居全国之首。要解决这些日益严重的不平等问题,同时避免重复现有的项目,就需要对基于证据的生活方式干预措施进行适当的调整。然而,很少有已发表的文章详细说明如何实现这种背景和文化上的调整。

方法

在本文中,我们描述了对“做出更好的选择 2 (MBC2)”移动健康饮食和活动随机试验以及修订后的农村阿巴拉契亚干预实施协议进行改编的过程。利用 NIH 的健康文化框架和 Aaron 的改编框架,迭代改编过程包括召开焦点小组(N=4,38 名参与者)、进行关键知情人访谈(N=16)、与我们的社区咨询委员会(N=9)核实调查结果,以及开展可用性调查(N=8)、线框设计(N=8)和试点测试(N=9)。这一密集的过程导致了招募、保留、评估和干预措施的全面修订。在主要试验中,将有 350 名参与者被随机分配到接受多组分 MBC2 饮食和活动干预组或积极对照组(压力和睡眠管理)。主要结果是四个行为结果的综合评分:两个与饮食有关的结果(增加水果和蔬菜摄入量,减少饱和脂肪摄入量)和两个与活动有关的结果(增加适度剧烈体力活动[MVPA]和减少久坐活动时间)。次要结果包括生物标志物的变化,包括血压、血脂、A1C、腰围和 BMI。

讨论

为确保有效的、有针对性和文化适宜的卫生服务和项目,特别是为服务不足和弱势人群,有必要改编和实施基于证据的干预措施。本文描述了一种适应性、社区嵌入式健康干预措施的开发过程,以及为改善健康行为和最终推进健康公平而制定的最终方案。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符 NCT04309461。该试验于 2020 年 6 月 3 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/9644509/729ad45f8d58/12889_2022_14475_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/9644509/1930a3e55e42/12889_2022_14475_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/9644509/e314313bab2e/12889_2022_14475_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/9644509/729ad45f8d58/12889_2022_14475_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/9644509/1930a3e55e42/12889_2022_14475_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/9644509/e314313bab2e/12889_2022_14475_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e1e/9644509/729ad45f8d58/12889_2022_14475_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Adaptation and study protocol of the evidence-based Make Better Choices (MBC2) multiple diet and activity change intervention for a rural Appalachian population.适应和研究方案的循证制作更好的选择 (MBC2) 多种饮食和活动改变干预为农村阿巴拉契亚人口。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):2043. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14475-0.
2
Multicomponent mHealth Intervention for Large, Sustained Change in Multiple Diet and Activity Risk Behaviors: The Make Better Choices 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.多成分移动健康干预对多种饮食和活动风险行为产生大规模、持续性改变:“做出更好选择2”随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 19;20(6):e10528. doi: 10.2196/10528.
3
Design and protocol of a randomized multiple behavior change trial: Make Better Choices 2 (MBC2).一项随机多行为改变试验的设计与方案:做出更好选择2(MBC2)
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Mar;41:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
The effect of community groups and mobile phone messages on the prevention and control of diabetes in rural Bangladesh: study protocol for a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial.社区团体和手机信息对孟加拉国农村地区糖尿病防控的影响:一项三臂整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Dec 19;17(1):600. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1738-x.
6
App-technology to improve lifestyle behaviors among working adults - the Health Integrator study, a randomized controlled trial.应用技术改善工作成年人的生活方式行为 - 健康整合器研究,一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Mar 7;19(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6595-6.
7
Effectiveness of an mHealth intervention to improve the cardiometabolic profile of people with prehypertension in low-resource urban settings in Latin America: a randomised controlled trial.在拉丁美洲资源匮乏的城市环境中,使用移动医疗干预措施来改善轻度高血压人群的心血代谢特征的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Jan;4(1):52-63. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00381-2. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
8
The effect of weight management interventions that include a diet component on weight-related outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women: a systematic review protocol.包含饮食成分的体重管理干预措施对孕妇和产后女性体重相关结局的影响:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):88-98. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1812.
9
Virtualized clinical studies to assess the natural history and impact of gut microbiome modulation in non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 a randomized, open-label, prospective study with a parallel group study evaluating the physiologic effects of KB109 on gut microbiota structure and function: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled study.用于评估非住院轻中度 COVID-19 患者肠道微生物组调节的自然史和影响的虚拟化临床研究:一项随机、开放标签、前瞻性研究,平行组研究评估 KB109 对肠道微生物组结构和功能的生理影响:一项随机对照研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05157-0.
10
Adaptation of a Mobile Interactive Obesity Treatment Approach for Early Severe Mental Illness: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Implementation and Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.一种适用于早期严重精神疾病的移动交互式肥胖治疗方法:混合方法实施与试点随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jun 9;12:e42114. doi: 10.2196/42114.

引用本文的文献

1
Community engagement through social media: A promising low-cost strategy for rural recruitment?社交媒体的社区参与:农村招募的有前途的低成本策略?
J Rural Health. 2024 Jun;40(3):467-475. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12809. Epub 2023 Nov 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiencing Cancer in Appalachian Kentucky.肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区的癌症经历
J Appalach Health. 2020 Jul 19;2(3):74-116. doi: 10.13023/jah.0203.09. eCollection 2020.
2
Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity.实施科学应该更加重视卫生公平。
Implement Sci. 2021 Mar 19;16(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01097-0.
3
Rural Residents' Perspectives on an mHealth or Personalized Health Coaching Intervention: Qualitative Study With Focus Groups and Key Informant Interviews.农村居民对移动健康或个性化健康指导干预措施的看法:基于焦点小组和关键信息人访谈的定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Feb 26;5(2):e18853. doi: 10.2196/18853.
4
Using Mobile Health Tools to Engage Rural Underserved Individuals in a Diabetes Education Program in South Texas: Feasibility Study.利用移动健康工具使德克萨斯州南部农村未得到充分服务的个体参与糖尿病教育计划:可行性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Mar 24;8(3):e16683. doi: 10.2196/16683.
5
The health equity implementation framework: proposal and preliminary study of hepatitis C virus treatment.卫生公平实施框架:丙型肝炎病毒治疗的建议和初步研究。
Implement Sci. 2019 Mar 12;14(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0861-y.
6
Multicomponent mHealth Intervention for Large, Sustained Change in Multiple Diet and Activity Risk Behaviors: The Make Better Choices 2 Randomized Controlled Trial.多成分移动健康干预对多种饮食和活动风险行为产生大规模、持续性改变:“做出更好选择2”随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 19;20(6):e10528. doi: 10.2196/10528.
7
Widening Disparities In Infant Mortality And Life Expectancy Between Appalachia And The Rest Of The United States, 1990-2013.1990-2013 年美国阿巴拉契亚地区与其他地区婴儿死亡率和预期寿命差距日益扩大。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Aug 1;36(8):1423-1432. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1571.
8
The science of stakeholder engagement in research: classification, implementation, and evaluation.研究中利益相关者参与的科学:分类、实施与评估。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):486-491. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0495-z.
9
Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework.医疗保健干预措施的可接受性:综述概述及理论框架的构建
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8.
10
A randomized controlled trial of a faith-placed, lay health advisor delivered smoking cessation intervention for rural residents.一项针对农村居民的、由非专业健康顾问基于信念实施的戒烟干预随机对照试验。
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Apr 2;3:317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.03.006. eCollection 2016 Jun.