• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对农村居民的、由非专业健康顾问基于信念实施的戒烟干预随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial of a faith-placed, lay health advisor delivered smoking cessation intervention for rural residents.

作者信息

Schoenberg Nancy E, Studts Christina R, Shelton Brent J, Liu Meng, Clayton Richard, Bispo Jordan Baeker, Fields Nell, Dignan Mark, Cooper Thomas

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, United States.

Department of Health Behavior, University of Kentucky, United States.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2016 Apr 2;3:317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.03.006. eCollection 2016 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.03.006
PMID:27419031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4929151/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rural US residents smoke at higher rates than urban or suburban residents. We report results from a community-based smoking cessation intervention in Appalachian Kentucky.

STUDY DESIGN

Single-blind, group-randomized trial with outcome measurements at baseline, 17 weeks and 43 weeks.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: This faith-placed CBPR project was located in six counties of rural Appalachian Kentucky. A total of 590 individual participants clustered in 28 churches were enrolled in the study.

INTERVENTION

Local lay health advisors delivered the 12-week Cooper/Clayton Method to Stop Smoking program, leveraging sociocultural factors to improve the cultural salience of the program for Appalachian smokers. Participants met with an interventionist for one 90 min group session once per week incorporating didactic information, group discussion, and nicotine replacement therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was self-reported smoking status. Secondary outcomes included Fagerström nicotine dependence, self-efficacy, and decisional balance.

RESULTS

With post-intervention data from 92% of participants, those in intervention group churches (N = 383) had 13.6 times higher odds of reporting quitting smoking one month post-intervention than participants in attention control group churches (N = 154, p < 0.0001). In addition, although only 3.2% of attention control group participants reported quitting during the control period, 15.4% of attention control participants reported quitting smoking after receiving the intervention. A significant dose effect of the 12-session Cooper/Clayton Method was detected: for each additional session completed, the odds of quitting smoking increased by 26%.

CONCLUSIONS

The Cooper/Clayton Method, delivered in rural Appalachian churches by lay health advisors, has strong potential to reduce smoking rates and improve individuals' health.

摘要

引言

美国农村居民的吸烟率高于城市或郊区居民。我们报告了肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区一项基于社区的戒烟干预措施的结果。

研究设计

单盲、群组随机试验,在基线、17周和43周进行结果测量。

地点/参与者:这个基于信仰的社区参与性研究项目位于肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚农村的六个县。共有590名个体参与者聚集在28个教堂中参与了该研究。

干预措施

当地的非专业健康顾问实施了为期12周的库珀/克莱顿戒烟方法项目,利用社会文化因素提高该项目对阿巴拉契亚吸烟者的文化显著性。参与者每周与一名干预者进行一次90分钟的小组会议,内容包括教学信息、小组讨论和尼古丁替代疗法。

主要结局指标

主要结局是自我报告的吸烟状况。次要结局包括法格斯特龙尼古丁依赖、自我效能感和决策平衡。

结果

根据92%参与者的干预后数据,干预组教堂的参与者(N = 383)在干预后一个月报告戒烟的几率比注意力控制组教堂的参与者(N = 154,p < 0.0001)高13.6倍。此外,虽然在对照期只有3.2%的注意力控制组参与者报告戒烟,但15.4%的注意力控制组参与者在接受干预后报告戒烟。检测到12节库珀/克莱顿方法课程有显著的剂量效应:每多完成一节课,戒烟的几率就增加26%。

结论

由非专业健康顾问在阿巴拉契亚农村教堂实施的库珀/克莱顿方法,在降低吸烟率和改善个人健康方面具有很大潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13ae/4929151/134ecd778762/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13ae/4929151/134ecd778762/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13ae/4929151/134ecd778762/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of a faith-placed, lay health advisor delivered smoking cessation intervention for rural residents.一项针对农村居民的、由非专业健康顾问基于信念实施的戒烟干预随机对照试验。
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Apr 2;3:317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.03.006. eCollection 2016 Jun.
2
A bespoke smoking cessation service compared with treatment as usual for people with severe mental ill health: the SCIMITAR+ RCT.针对严重精神健康问题患者的定制化戒烟服务与常规治疗相比:SCIMITAR+RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(50):1-116. doi: 10.3310/hta23500.
3
E-cigarettes compared with nicotine replacement therapy within the UK Stop Smoking Services: the TEC RCT.电子烟与尼古丁替代疗法在英国戒烟服务中的比较:TEC RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Aug;23(43):1-82. doi: 10.3310/hta23430.
4
A Christian Faith-Based Facebook Intervention for Smoking Cessation in Rural Communities (FAITH-CORE): Protocol for a Community Participatory Development Study.一项基于基督教信仰的农村社区戒烟Facebook干预措施(FAITH-CORE):一项社区参与式发展研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Dec 13;12:e52398. doi: 10.2196/52398.
5
A rural Appalachian faith-placed smoking cessation intervention.一项阿巴拉契亚农村地区基于信仰的戒烟干预措施。
J Relig Health. 2015 Apr;54(2):598-611. doi: 10.1007/s10943-014-9858-7.
6
Motivational support intervention to reduce smoking and increase physical activity in smokers not ready to quit: the TARS RCT.动机支持干预减少吸烟者的吸烟量并增加其运动量,适用于那些尚未准备好戒烟的吸烟者:TARS RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Mar;27(4):1-277. doi: 10.3310/KLTG1447.
7
Urban and Rural Disparities in a WeChat-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention among Chinese Smokers.基于微信的中国吸烟者戒烟干预的城乡差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 23;18(13):6731. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136731.
8
Mediators of the effect of nicotine pre-treatment on quitting smoking.尼古丁预处理对戒烟效果的影响中介物。
Addiction. 2018 Dec;113(12):2280-2289. doi: 10.1111/add.14401. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
9
A pilot randomised trial to assess the methods and procedures for evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Exercise Assisted Reduction then Stop (EARS) among disadvantaged smokers.一项评估运动辅助戒烟(EARS)对弱势吸烟者的临床效果和成本效益的方法和程序的初步随机试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Jan;18(4):1-324. doi: 10.3310/hta18040.
10
Incentives for smoking cessation.戒烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 18(5):CD004307. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004307.pub5.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in time to treatment initiation of invasive lung cancer among Black and White patients in Tennessee.田纳西州黑人和白人患者在侵袭性肺癌治疗开始时间上的差异。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 3;20(1):e0311186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311186. eCollection 2025.
2
Mobilizing faith-based COVID-19 health ambassadors to address COVID-19 health disparities among African American older adults in under-resourced communities: A hybrid, community-based participatory intervention.动员信仰为基础的 COVID-19 健康大使,以解决资源匮乏社区中非洲裔美国老年人的 COVID-19 健康差距:一项混合的、以社区为基础的参与性干预。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 15;19(2):e0285963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285963. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in cigarette smoking and obesity in Appalachian Kentucky.肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区的吸烟与肥胖趋势
South Med J. 2015 Mar;108(3):170-7. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000245.
2
A rural Appalachian faith-placed smoking cessation intervention.一项阿巴拉契亚农村地区基于信仰的戒烟干预措施。
J Relig Health. 2015 Apr;54(2):598-611. doi: 10.1007/s10943-014-9858-7.
3
'Real-world' effectiveness of smoking cessation treatments: a population study.戒烟治疗的“真实世界”有效性:一项人群研究。
Tobacco use characteristics, treatment preferences, and motivation to quit among adults accessing a day shelter in Oklahoma City.
俄克拉荷马城一家日间收容所内成年吸烟者的烟草使用特征、治疗偏好及戒烟动机。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2022 Nov 5;5:100117. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100117. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Adaptation and study protocol of the evidence-based Make Better Choices (MBC2) multiple diet and activity change intervention for a rural Appalachian population.适应和研究方案的循证制作更好的选择 (MBC2) 多种饮食和活动改变干预为农村阿巴拉契亚人口。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):2043. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14475-0.
5
Congregational health needs by key demographic variables: Findings from a congregational health needs assessment tool.按关键人口统计学变量划分的会众健康需求: congregational health needs assessment tool 的调查结果。
Eval Program Plann. 2022 Oct;94:102138. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102138. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
6
A Framework for Equitable Partnerships to Promote Cancer Prevention and Control in Rural Settings.促进农村地区癌症预防与控制的公平伙伴关系框架。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2022 Mar 2;6(2). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkac017.
7
State health disparities research in Rural America: Gaps and future directions in an era of COVID-19.美国农村地区的健康不平等研究:新冠疫情时代的差距和未来方向。
J Rural Health. 2021 Jun;37(3):460-466. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12562. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
8
Persistent disparities in smoking among rural Appalachians: evidence from the Mountain Air Project.阿巴拉契亚农村地区吸烟情况长期存在的差异:来自山区空气项目的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;21(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10334-6.
9
Evidence for Cancer Literacy Knowledge Retention among Kentucky Middle and High School Students after a Brief Educational Intervention.肯塔基州中学和高中生在简短的教育干预后对癌症知识的保留情况。
South Med J. 2020 Nov;113(11):541-548. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001171.
10
A Brief Educational Intervention Enhances Basic Cancer Literacy Among Kentucky Middle and High School Students.一项简短的教育干预措施提高了肯塔基州中学生的基本癌症知识水平。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Aug;36(4):735-740. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01696-3.
Addiction. 2014 Mar;109(3):491-9. doi: 10.1111/add.12429. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
4
Rural Appalachian perspectives on heart health: social ecological contexts.阿巴拉契亚农村地区对心脏健康的看法:社会生态背景
Am J Health Behav. 2014 Jan;38(1):134-43. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.38.1.14.
5
A systematic review of studies assessing the association between adherence to smoking cessation medication and treatment success.评估戒烟药物依从性与治疗成功之间关联的研究的系统评价。
Addiction. 2014 Jan;109(1):35-43. doi: 10.1111/add.12319. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
6
Results from a community-based smoking cessation treatment program for LGBT smokers.基于社区的 LGBT 吸烟者戒烟治疗计划的结果。
J Environ Public Health. 2013;2013:984508. doi: 10.1155/2013/984508. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
7
Community strategies to address cancer disparities in Appalachian Kentucky.阿巴拉契亚肯塔基州解决癌症差异的社区策略。
Fam Community Health. 2012 Jan-Mar;35(1):31-43. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e3182385d2c.
8
An internet-based smoking cessation program for Korean Americans: results from a randomized controlled trial.基于互联网的美籍韩裔戒烟项目:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2011 May;13(5):336-43. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq260. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
9
All Nations Breath of Life: using community-based participatory research to address health disparities in cigarette smoking among American Indians.全民族生命呼吸:运用社区为基础的参与式研究来解决美洲印第安人吸烟方面的健康差异问题。
Ethn Dis. 2010 Autumn;20(4):334-8.
10
Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 2009.青少年危险行为监测 - 美国,2009 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2010 Jun 4;59(5):1-142.