研究中利益相关者参与的科学：分类、实施与评估。
The science of stakeholder engagement in research: classification, implementation, and evaluation.
作者信息
Goodman Melody S, Sanders Thompson Vetta L
机构信息
College of Global Public Health, New York University, 715-719 Broadway, 10th Floor, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
出版信息
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):486-491. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0495-z.
Abstract
In this commentary, we discuss the science of stakeholder engagement in research. We propose a classification system with definitions to determine where projects lie on the stakeholder engagement continuum. We discuss the key elements of implementation and evaluation of stakeholder engagement in research posing key questions to consider when doing this work. We commend and critique the work of Hamilton et al. in their multilevel stakeholder engagement in a VA implementation trial of evidence-based quality improvement in women's health primary care. We also discuss the need for more work in this area to enhance the science of stakeholder engagement in research.
摘要
在本评论中，我们讨论了研究中利益相关者参与的科学。我们提出了一个带有定义的分类系统，以确定项目在利益相关者参与连续统一体中的位置。我们讨论了研究中利益相关者参与实施和评估的关键要素，提出了开展这项工作时需要考虑的关键问题。我们赞扬并批评了汉密尔顿等人在退伍军人事务部女性健康初级保健循证质量改进实施试验中的多层次利益相关者参与工作。我们还讨论了在这一领域开展更多工作的必要性，以加强研究中利益相关者参与的科学。
相似文献
1
The science of stakeholder engagement in research: classification, implementation, and evaluation.研究中利益相关者参与的科学：分类、实施与评估。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):486-491. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0495-z.
2
The importance of symbolic and engaged participation in evidence-based quality improvement in a complex integrated healthcare system: response to "The science of stakeholder engagement in research".在复杂的综合性医疗保健系统中，基于证据的质量改进中象征性和参与式参与的重要性：对“利益相关者参与研究的科学”的回应。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):492-494. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0528-7.
3
Engaging multilevel stakeholders in an implementation trial of evidence-based quality improvement in VA women's health primary care.让多层次利益相关者参与退伍军人事务部女性健康初级保健循证质量改进的实施试验。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):478-485. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0501-5.
4
Proceedings of the 2017 Advancing the Science of Community Engaged Research (CEnR) Conference.2017年社区参与研究（CEnR）科学进展会议论文集
BMC Proc. 2019 Apr 19;13(Suppl 3):3. doi: 10.1186/s12919-019-0164-y. eCollection 2019.
5
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.实施健康研究参与策略的伦理挑战与机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
6
Reaching Consensus on Principles of Stakeholder Engagement in Research.达成利益相关者参与研究原则的共识。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(1):117-127. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0014.
7
Stakeholder engagement to inform HIV clinical trials: a systematic review of the evidence.利益相关者参与以告知 HIV 临床试验：证据的系统评价。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Oct;21 Suppl 7(Suppl Suppl 7):e25174. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25174.
8
Enhancing Mental and Physical Health of Women through Engagement and Retention (EMPOWER): a protocol for a program of research.通过参与和留用提高妇女的身心健康（EMPOWER）：一项研究计划的方案。
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 7;12(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0658-9.
9
Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services.迈向实施利益相关者参与模型（I-STEM），以改善医疗保健服务。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1997-2012. doi: 10.1111/hex.13808. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
10
Stakeholder Engagement in Late-Stage Translation Research and Implementation Science: Perspectives From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.利益相关者参与晚期翻译研究和实施科学：来自国家心肺血液研究所的观点。
Glob Heart. 2019 Jun;14(2):191-194. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2019.06.005.
引用本文的文献
1
The research equity and diversity initiative (READI): Changing the face of clinical research through community outreach and engagement.研究公平与多样性倡议（READI）：通过社区外展和参与改变临床研究的面貌。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jul 7;9(1):e156. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10085. eCollection 2025.
2
How does integrated knowledge translation work? A realist review.整合性知识转化如何发挥作用？一项实在论综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Aug 5;23(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01374-0.
3
A Formative Evaluation of Interventions to Enhance Clinical Trial Diversity Guided by the Socioecological Model.以社会生态模型为指导的增强临床试验多样性干预措施的形成性评估。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 9;17(14):2282. doi: 10.3390/cancers17142282.
4
APOLLO-Live: A multi-criteria-based webtool for synchronous group decision making and consensus support in energy and climate policy deliberations.阿波罗实时在线：一种基于多标准的网络工具，用于能源与气候政策审议中的同步群体决策和共识支持。
Open Res Eur. 2025 Jul 8;5:88. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.19614.2. eCollection 2025.
5
Engaging underrepresented populations in public health monitoring: strategies for people with mild intellectual disability or low literacy skills.让代表性不足的人群参与公共卫生监测：针对轻度智力残疾或低识字技能人群的策略。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jul 14;24(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02578-0.
6
Quality improvement of a community-engaged authorship system: lessons learned from the RECOVER initiative.社区参与作者署名系统的质量改进：从RECOVER倡议中汲取的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):919. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12914-3.
7
Leveraging research steering committees for stakeholder engagement: a multifaceted strategy in Brazilian implementation projects.利用研究指导委员会促进利益相关者参与：巴西实施项目中的多方面策略。
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 May 31. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04081-x.
8
Community-Engaged Research in Early Home Visiting: A Scoping Review of Peer-Reviewed Literature.早期家访中的社区参与式研究：同行评审文献的范围综述
Prev Sci. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01812-z.
9
Community intervention to reduce cardiovascular disease in Chicago (CIRCL-Chicago): protocol for a type 3 hybrid effectiveness-implementation study using a parallel cluster-randomized trial design.芝加哥社区干预降低心血管疾病风险研究（CIRCL-芝加哥）：一项采用平行整群随机试验设计的3型混合效果-实施研究方案
Implement Sci. 2025 May 5;20(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01431-w.
10
Characterization and Evaluation of Department of Veterans Affairs Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities-Accredited Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Programs: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Program Evaluation.退伍军人事务部康复设施认证委员会认可的跨学科疼痛康复项目的特征描述与评估：混合方法项目评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 5;14:e72091. doi: 10.2196/72091.
本文引用的文献
1
EVALUATING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN RESEARCH: QUANTITATIVE MEASURE DEVELOPMENT.评估研究中的社区参与：定量测量方法的开发
J Community Psychol. 2017 Jan;45(1):17-32. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21828. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
2
Engaging multilevel stakeholders in an implementation trial of evidence-based quality improvement in VA women's health primary care.让多层次利益相关者参与退伍军人事务部女性健康初级保健循证质量改进的实施试验。
Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):478-485. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0501-5.
3
Increasing Community Research Capacity to Address Health Disparities.增强社区研究能力以解决健康差距问题。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Feb;12(1):55-66. doi: 10.1177/1556264616687639.
4
Fostering evidence-based quality improvement for patient-centered medical homes: Initiating local quality councils to transform primary care.促进以患者为中心的医疗之家的循证质量改进：启动地方质量委员会以转变初级保健。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2018 Apr/Jun;43(2):168-180. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000138.
5
Quantitative Evaluation of the Community Research Fellows Training Program.社区研究员培训计划的定量评估。
Front Public Health. 2015 Jul 16;3:179. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00179. eCollection 2015.
6
A Tale of Two Community Networks Program Centers: Operationalizing and Assessing CBPR Principles and Evaluating Partnership Outcomes.两个社区网络项目中心的故事：实施与评估社区参与式行动研究原则并评估伙伴关系成果
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015;9 Suppl(Suppl):61-9. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0026.
7
Increasing research literacy: the community research fellows training program.提高研究素养：社区研究人员培训项目
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2015 Feb;10(1):3-12. doi: 10.1177/1556264614561959. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
8
A Community Coalition to Address Cancer Disparities: Transitions, Successes and Challenges.一个致力于解决癌症差异问题的社区联盟：转变、成功与挑战
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):616-22. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0746-3.
9
Relationships hold the key to trustworthy and productive translational science: recommendations for expanding community engagement in biomedical research.关系是实现可信赖和富有成效的转化科学的关键：扩大社区参与生物医学研究的建议。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Aug;6(4):310-3. doi: 10.1111/cts.12022. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
10
Community representatives' involvement in Clinical and Translational Science Awardee activities.社区代表参与临床和转化科学奖获得者的活动。
Clin Transl Sci. 2013 Aug;6(4):292-6. doi: 10.1111/cts.12072. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
Zotero 插件