• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国和日本椎板成形术的比较应用情况

Comparative Utilization of Laminoplasty in the United States and Japan.

作者信息

H Waddell William, M Weisenthal Benjamin, Golinvaux Nicholas, L Henry Abigail, Pennings Jacquelyn, P Wanner John, Gupta Rishabh, Yoshii Toshitaka, Feifei Zhou, F Stephens Byron

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA.

University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, USA.

出版信息

Spine Surg Relat Res. 2022 Feb 10;6(5):460-463. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2021-0210. eCollection 2022 Sep 27.

DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2021-0210
PMID:36348680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9605747/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laminoplasty is a well-established technique used to manage cervical myelopathy (CM). Nevertheless, the degree to which United States surgeons have adopted laminoplasty from Japan to treat CM is less clear. The purpose of this study was to compare operative management strategies for CM in the United States (US) with Japan.

METHODS

This study used a retrospective cohort of 16,084 patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database and 389,872 patients from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database from 2007 to 2015. Patients with the following diagnoses were collected: spondylosis with myelopathy (ICD-19; 721.1, ICD-10; M47.12) and disk herniation with myelopathy (ICD-9; 722.71, ICD-10; M50.00). The proportion of surgeries between Japan and the US was compared using a linear regression model controlling for year.

RESULTS

US surgeons utilized anterior procedures in 70% of cases compared to 9% in Japan (p<.001). In contrast, Japan had significantly more laminoplasties than the US (43% vs. 4%, respectively, p<.001). The percentage of laminoplasty in Japan (43%) relative to the percentage in the US (4%) was significantly different (p<.001). Accounting for increases in the number of total surgeries per year seen in the ACS-NSQIP and DPC databases, no specific surgery demonstrated a significant increase or decrease over the 8 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese surgeons employ laminoplasty to treat CM approximately ten times more frequently than US surgeons who prefer anterior procedures.

摘要

引言

椎板成形术是治疗脊髓型颈椎病(CM)的一种成熟技术。然而,美国外科医生从日本采用椎板成形术治疗CM的程度尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较美国和日本治疗CM的手术管理策略。

方法

本研究使用了回顾性队列研究,数据来自美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库中的16084例患者以及2007年至2015年日本诊断程序组合(DPC)数据库中的389872例患者。收集了以下诊断的患者:脊髓型颈椎病(ICD-9;721.1,ICD-10;M47.12)和伴有脊髓病的椎间盘突出症(ICD-9;722.71,ICD-10;M50.00)。使用控制年份的线性回归模型比较了日本和美国之间的手术比例。

结果

美国外科医生在70%的病例中采用前路手术,而日本为9%(p<0.001)。相比之下,日本的椎板成形术明显多于美国(分别为43%和4%,p<0.001)。日本椎板成形术的百分比(43%)相对于美国的百分比(4%)有显著差异(p<0.001)。考虑到ACS-NSQIP和DPC数据库中每年手术总数的增加,在8年期间没有特定的手术显示出显著增加或减少。

结论

日本外科医生使用椎板成形术治疗CM的频率大约是更喜欢前路手术的美国外科医生的十倍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c577/9605747/b12c792680e4/2432-261X-6-0460-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c577/9605747/b12c792680e4/2432-261X-6-0460-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c577/9605747/b12c792680e4/2432-261X-6-0460-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Utilization of Laminoplasty in the United States and Japan.美国和日本椎板成形术的比较应用情况
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2022 Feb 10;6(5):460-463. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2021-0210. eCollection 2022 Sep 27.
2
Predictors of 30-Day Readmission Following Cervical Laminoplasty in 3,085 Patients: An American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Database Study.3085例患者颈椎椎板成形术后30天再入院的预测因素:一项美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据库研究
Cureus. 2022 Dec 13;14(12):e32480. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32480. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: National trends in the treatment and peri-operative outcomes over 10years.脊髓型颈椎病:10 年治疗及围手术期结果的全国趋势
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Aug;42:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 May 2.
4
Surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an analysis of a national, administrative, longitudinal database.脊髓型颈椎病的手术疗效:一项基于全国行政纵向数据库的分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2016 Jun;40(6):E11. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.FOCUS1669.
5
A systematic review of clinical and surgical predictors of complications following surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy.对退行性颈椎脊髓病手术后并发症的临床和手术预测因素的系统评价。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):77-99. doi: 10.3171/2015.3.SPINE14971. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
6
Comparison of Perioperative Complications Between Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Laminoplasty For Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Propensity Score-matching Analysis Using Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database.对比颈椎脊髓病前路减压融合术与椎板成形术的围手术期并发症:利用日本诊断程序组合数据库进行倾向评分匹配分析。
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Apr;33(3):E101-E107. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000864.
7
Myelopathy is associated with increased all-cause morbidity and mortality following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a study of 5256 patients in American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).脊髓病与颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后全因发病率和死亡率增加相关:一项针对美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS - NSQIP)中5256例患者的研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Apr 1;40(7):443-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000785.
8
Outcomes after laminoplasty compared with laminectomy and fusion in patients with cervical myelopathy: a systematic review.颈椎脊髓病患者行椎板成形术与椎板切除术和融合术的疗效比较:系统评价。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S183-94. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eb7c.
9
Surgically treated cervical myelopathy: a functional outcome comparison study between multilevel anterior cervical decompression fusion with instrumentation and posterior laminoplasty.手术治疗的颈椎病:多节段前路颈椎减压融合内固定术与后路单开门椎管扩大成形术的功能预后比较研究。
Spine J. 2013 Jul;13(7):723-31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.038. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
10
Effect of different surgical methods on headache associated with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and/or radiculopathy.不同手术方法对脊髓型颈椎病和/或神经根型颈椎病相关头痛的影响。
BMC Surg. 2015 Sep 23;15(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12893-015-0092-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Perception of Health Literacy and Barriers to Care Among Cervical Stenosis Patients.颈椎管狭窄症患者健康素养认知及就医障碍中的种族/民族差异
Global Spine J. 2025 Jan 30:21925682251318262. doi: 10.1177/21925682251318262.
2
Cervical laminoplasty versus laminectomy and posterior cervical fusion for cervical myelopathy: propensity-matched analysis of 24-month outcomes from the Quality Outcomes Database.颈椎板成形术与椎板切除术和后路颈椎融合术治疗颈椎病:来自质量结果数据库的 24 个月结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Aug 11;39(5):671-681. doi: 10.3171/2023.6.SPINE23345. Print 2023 Nov 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Current surgical practice for multi-level degenerative cervical myelopathy: Findings from an international survey of spinal surgeons.多节段退变性颈脊髓病的当前手术治疗:一项国际脊柱外科医生调查的结果。
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 May;87:84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.01.049. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
Perioperative Complications of Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Comparison Between 3 Procedures.退行性颈椎脊髓病手术的围手术期并发症:三种手术方法的比较
Global Spine J. 2023 Mar;13(2):432-442. doi: 10.1177/2192568221998306. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
3
Comparison of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion versus Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes.
颈椎前路减压融合术与单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的疗效比较:一项临床和影像学结局的荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Oct;130:530-536.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.144. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
4
Comparison of laminectomy and fusion vs laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis.椎板切除术与融合术对比椎板成形术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Mar;98(13):e14971. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014971.
5
Trends in the Treatment of Single and Multilevel Cervical Stenosis: A Review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database.颈椎单节段和多节段狭窄的治疗趋势:对美国骨科外科委员会数据库的回顾。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Sep 20;99(18):e99. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01082.
6
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: A meta-analysis.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与后路单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Dec;48:247-253. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.030. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
7
Laminoplasty Does not Lead to Worsening Axial Neck Pain in the Properly Selected Patient With Cervical Myelopathy: A Comparison With Laminectomy and Fusion.适当选择的颈椎脊髓病患者行椎板成形术不会导致轴向颈部疼痛加重:与椎板切除术和融合术的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Dec 15;42(24):1844-1850. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002308.
8
Socioeconomic and regional differences in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.脊髓型颈椎病治疗中的社会经济和地区差异。
Surg Neurol Int. 2017 May 26;8:92. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_471_16. eCollection 2017.
9
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: National trends in the treatment and peri-operative outcomes over 10years.脊髓型颈椎病:10 年治疗及围手术期结果的全国趋势
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Aug;42:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 May 2.
10
Study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre study: the Foraminotomy ACDF Cost-Effectiveness Trial (FACET) in patients with cervical radiculopathy.一项随机对照多中心研究的研究方案:颈椎神经根病患者的侧块切除-前路颈椎间盘切除术的成本效益试验(FACET)。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 5;7(1):e012829. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012829.