Suppr超能文献

大流行期间YouTube上关于COVID-19孕妇患者的视频分析

Analysis of YouTube Videos on Pregnant COVID-19 Patients During the Pandemic Period.

作者信息

Atigan Ayhan

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karabuk University, Karabük, TUR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Oct 5;14(10):e29934. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29934. eCollection 2022 Oct.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pregnant women often refer to YouTube videos when they are worried about themselves and/or their baby. This study aims to evaluate COVID-19 and pregnancy-related content on YouTube, the platform that comes to mind first when social media is mentioned.

METHODS

YouTube videos were evaluated between September 7-10, 2022. "COVID-19 pregnancy" videos with more than 100.000 views were included in the study. The content and technical data of 45 videos were recorded. The videos were scored using the DISCERN score, Video Power Index (VPI), and Global Quality Scale (GQS).

RESULTS

Of the 45 videos with a mean duration of 432 seconds, 32 (71.1%) of them originated in the USA, 38 (84.4%) of them were presented by healthcare workers, and 36 (80.0%) of them recommended vaccination. Accounts producing the videos had a mean of 3,037,619 subscribers. The videos we analyzed were viewed a mean of 522836 times. These videos had 9287 likes and 1891 comments. The DISCERN, VPI, and GQS mean scores of the videos were 32.36, 74.76, and 3.82, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In order to correctly inform society about health problems, healthcare workers must make presentations on YouTube with a controlled mechanism. There is confusion about information on the internet, and people must acquire information selectively.

摘要

目的

孕妇在担心自己和/或胎儿时经常会参考YouTube视频。本研究旨在评估YouTube上与新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)和妊娠相关的内容,YouTube是提及社交媒体时首先会想到的平台。

方法

于2022年9月7日至10日对YouTube视频进行评估。纳入观看次数超过100000的“COVID-19妊娠”视频。记录45个视频的内容和技术数据。使用DISCERN评分、视频影响力指数(VPI)和全球质量量表(GQS)对视频进行评分。

结果

45个视频的平均时长为432秒,其中32个(71.1%)来自美国,38个(84.4%)由医护人员讲解,36个(80.0%)推荐接种疫苗。制作这些视频的账号平均有3037619名订阅者。我们分析的视频平均观看次数为522836次。这些视频有9287个赞和1891条评论。这些视频的DISCERN、VPI和GQS平均得分分别为32.36、74.76和3.82。

结论

为了向社会正确宣传健康问题,医护人员必须通过可控机制在YouTube上进行讲解。互联网上的信息存在混乱,人们必须有选择地获取信息。

相似文献

1
Analysis of YouTube Videos on Pregnant COVID-19 Patients During the Pandemic Period.
Cureus. 2022 Oct 5;14(10):e29934. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29934. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Evaluation of Scientific Quality of YouTube Video Content Related to Umbilical Hernia.
Cureus. 2021 Apr 25;13(4):e14675. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14675.
4
A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):449.e1-449.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Evaluation of YouTube videos as a patient information source on intravitreal injection procedures.
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2022 Sep;45(7):748-755. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2022.02.023. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
6
Analysis of YouTube videos as a source of information for myocarditis during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Oct;111(10):1113-1120. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02026-x. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
7
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022.
8
YouTube Videos Related to the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster: Content Analysis.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jun 7;7(6):e26481. doi: 10.2196/26481.
9
Assessment of Reliability and Quality of Videos on Medial Epicondylitis Shared on YouTube.
Cureus. 2023 Apr 7;15(4):e37250. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37250. eCollection 2023 Apr.
10
Is the information about lateral epicondylitis on the YouTube platform reliable and of good quality?
Phys Sportsmed. 2023 Oct;51(5):458-462. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2022.2129504. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Content and quality of YouTube regarding women's health: a scoping review.
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2023 Sep;29(3):179-189. doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2023.08.19. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
2
YouTube and COVID-19 vaccines: A mini scoping review.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Dec 31;19(1):2202091. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2202091. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
3
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Exercise: Evaluation of YouTube Videos.
Cureus. 2023 Feb 17;15(2):e35093. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35093. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Social Media Content on Immunology: Is an Assessment by the Scientific Community Required?
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Feb 17;11(2):473. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11020473.

本文引用的文献

1
Covid-19 vaccines and variants of concern: A review.
Rev Med Virol. 2022 Jul;32(4):e2313. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2313. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
2
Breastfeeding and COVID-19.
Gac Med Mex. 2021;157(2):194-200. doi: 10.24875/GMM.20000665.
3
Evaluation of Scientific Quality of YouTube Video Content Related to Umbilical Hernia.
Cureus. 2021 Apr 25;13(4):e14675. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14675.
4
Reliability and Quality of YouTube Contents Pertaining to Pancreatic Cancer.
Cureus. 2021 Mar 24;13(3):e14085. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14085.
5
Evaluation of YouTube Video Content Related to the Management of Hypoglycemia.
Cureus. 2021 Jan 6;13(1):e12525. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12525.
9
Therapeutic Options for COVID-19: A Review.
Cureus. 2020 Sep 16;12(9):e10480. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10480.
10
The evolution of fetal echocardiography before and during COVID-19.
Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2020 Sep;58:101259. doi: 10.1016/j.ppedcard.2020.101259. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验