• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量化新冠疫情导致的主流媒体中疫苗接种覆盖率变化:文本挖掘研究

Quantifying Changes in Vaccine Coverage in Mainstream Media as a Result of the COVID-19 Outbreak: Text Mining Study.

作者信息

Christensen Bente, Laydon Daniel, Chelkowski Tadeusz, Jemielniak Dariusz, Vollmer Michaela, Bhatt Samir, Krawczyk Konrad

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark.

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis Imperial College London London United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Sep 20;2(2):e35121. doi: 10.2196/35121. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.

DOI:10.2196/35121
PMID:36348981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9631944/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Achieving herd immunity through vaccination depends upon the public's acceptance, which in turn relies on their understanding of its risks and benefits. The fundamental objective of public health messaging on vaccines is therefore the clear communication of often complex information and, increasingly, the countering of misinformation. The primary outlet shaping public understanding is mainstream online news media, where coverage of COVID-19 vaccines was widespread.

OBJECTIVE

We used text-mining analysis on the front pages of mainstream online news to quantify the volume and sentiment polarization of vaccine coverage.

METHODS

We analyzed 28 million articles from 172 major news sources across 11 countries between July 2015 and April 2021. We employed keyword-based frequency analysis to estimate the proportion of overall articles devoted to vaccines. We performed topic detection using BERTopic and named entity recognition to identify the leading subjects and actors mentioned in the context of vaccines. We used the Vader Python module to perform sentiment polarization quantification of all collated English-language articles.

RESULTS

The proportion of front-page articles mentioning vaccines increased from 0.1% to 4% with the outbreak of COVID-19. The number of negatively polarized articles increased from 6698 in 2015-2019 to 28,552 in 2020-2021. However, overall vaccine coverage before the COVID-19 pandemic was slightly negatively polarized (57% negative), whereas coverage during the pandemic was positively polarized (38% negative).

CONCLUSIONS

Throughout the pandemic, vaccines have risen from a marginal to a widely discussed topic on the front pages of major news outlets. Mainstream online media has been positively polarized toward vaccines, compared with mainly negative prepandemic vaccine news. However, the pandemic was accompanied by an order-of-magnitude increase in vaccine news that, due to low prepandemic frequency, may contribute to a perceived negative sentiment. These results highlight important interactions between the volume of news and overall polarization. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first systematic text mining study of front-page vaccine news headlines in the context of COVID-19.

摘要

背景

通过接种疫苗实现群体免疫取决于公众的接受程度,而公众的接受程度又依赖于他们对疫苗风险和益处的理解。因此,关于疫苗的公共卫生信息传递的基本目标是清晰地传达往往很复杂的信息,并且越来越多地要应对错误信息。塑造公众理解的主要渠道是主流在线新闻媒体,其中关于新冠疫苗的报道很广泛。

目的

我们对主流在线新闻的头版进行文本挖掘分析,以量化疫苗报道的数量和情感极化情况。

方法

我们分析了2015年7月至2021年4月期间来自11个国家172个主要新闻来源的2800万篇文章。我们采用基于关键词的频率分析来估计专门讨论疫苗的文章在所有文章中所占的比例。我们使用BERTopic进行主题检测,并使用命名实体识别来识别在疫苗相关背景下提到的主要主题和行为主体。我们使用Vader Python模块对所有整理好的英文文章进行情感极化量化。

结果

随着新冠疫情的爆发,头版文章中提及疫苗的比例从0.1%上升到了4%。负面极化文章的数量从2015 - 2019年的6698篇增加到了2020 - 2021年的28552篇。然而,在新冠疫情大流行之前,总体疫苗报道略微呈负面极化(57%为负面),而在疫情期间的报道呈正面极化(38%为负面)。

结论

在整个疫情期间,疫苗已从一个边缘话题上升为主要新闻媒体头版广泛讨论的话题。与疫情前主要为负面的疫苗新闻相比,主流在线媒体对疫苗的报道呈正面极化。然而,疫情期间疫苗新闻数量增加了一个数量级,由于疫情前频率较低,这可能导致一种负面情绪的感觉。这些结果突出了新闻数量与总体极化之间的重要相互作用。据我们所知,我们的工作是在新冠疫情背景下对头版疫苗新闻标题进行的首次系统文本挖掘研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/482d9be1f044/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/68767f7bb2bf/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/fe60bc1e4e0e/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/b91150c0eb30/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/3f762f06f13e/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/3ab50669d60e/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/3f9f765aa285/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/c807d3f2393b/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/482d9be1f044/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/68767f7bb2bf/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/fe60bc1e4e0e/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/b91150c0eb30/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/3f762f06f13e/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/3ab50669d60e/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/3f9f765aa285/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/c807d3f2393b/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d920/10117292/482d9be1f044/infodemiology_v2i2e35121_fig8.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantifying Changes in Vaccine Coverage in Mainstream Media as a Result of the COVID-19 Outbreak: Text Mining Study.量化新冠疫情导致的主流媒体中疫苗接种覆盖率变化:文本挖掘研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Sep 20;2(2):e35121. doi: 10.2196/35121. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
2
Quantifying Online News Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Text Mining Study and Resource.量化新冠疫情期间的在线新闻媒体报道:文本挖掘研究与资源
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 2;23(6):e28253. doi: 10.2196/28253.
3
Media Reporting Relating to COVID-19 Vaccination as a Driver of Vaccine Hesitancy Prior to the Second Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic in India: A Content Analysis of Newspaper and Digital Media Reports.在印度第二波新冠疫情大流行之前,媒体对新冠疫苗接种的报道成为疫苗犹豫的一个驱动因素:报纸和数字媒体报道的内容分析
Cureus. 2023 Mar 27;15(3):e36750. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36750. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Discussion on Twitter: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis.新冠疫苗相关推文的讨论:主题建模和情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 29;23(6):e24435. doi: 10.2196/24435.
5
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
6
One Year of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter: Longitudinal Study.《推特上一年的 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息:纵向研究》。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 24;25:e42227. doi: 10.2196/42227.
7
Topics and Sentiments of Public Concerns Regarding COVID-19 Vaccines: Social Media Trend Analysis.公众对新冠疫苗关注的话题和情绪:社交媒体趋势分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 21;23(10):e30765. doi: 10.2196/30765.
8
News Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Social Media and the Public's Negative Emotions: Computational Study.社交媒体对 COVID-19 大流行的新闻报道与公众的负面情绪:计算研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 6;26:e48491. doi: 10.2196/48491.
9
Analyzing Themes, Sentiments, and Coping Strategies Regarding Online News Coverage of Depression in Hong Kong: Mixed Methods Study.分析香港抑郁症在线新闻报道的主题、情感及应对策略:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 13;27:e66696. doi: 10.2196/66696.
10
COVID-19 Vaccine Tweets After Vaccine Rollout: Sentiment-Based Topic Modeling.疫苗接种后关于 COVID-19 疫苗的推文:基于情感的主题建模。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 8;24(2):e31726. doi: 10.2196/31726.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in Fear and Negativity Levels Between Formal and Informal Health-Related Websites: Analysis of Sentiments and Emotions.正式与非正式健康相关网站之间的恐惧和消极水平差异:情感分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 9;26:e55151. doi: 10.2196/55151.
2
Scientific clickbait: Examining media coverage and readability in genome-wide association research.科学噱头:全基因组关联研究中的媒体报道和可读性分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 5;19(1):e0296323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296323. eCollection 2024.
3
Sentiment Analysis toward the COVID-19 Vaccine in the Main Latin American Media on Twitter: The Cases of Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru.

本文引用的文献

1
"A matter of time": Evidence-making temporalities of vaccine development in the COVID-19 media landscape.“时间问题”:新冠疫情媒体环境下疫苗研发的证据生成时间性
Time Soc. 2022 Feb;31(1):132-154. doi: 10.1177/0961463X211032201.
2
An analysis of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and fear mongering on Twitter.分析推特上阿斯利康 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息和恐惧言论。
Public Health. 2021 Nov;200:4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.08.019. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
3
Changes in Attitudes towards the COVID-19 Vaccine and the Willingness to Get Vaccinated among Adults in Poland: Analysis of Serial, Cross-Sectional, Representative Surveys, January-April 2021.
推特上拉丁美洲主要媒体对新冠疫苗的情绪分析:阿根廷、智利、哥伦比亚、墨西哥和秘鲁的情况
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Oct 14;11(10):1592. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11101592.
4
Post-truth epistemic beliefs rooted in the Dark Factor of Personality are associated with higher COVID-19 vaccination refusal.根植于人格黑暗因素的后真相认识论信念与更高的 COVID-19 疫苗拒绝率有关。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 14;13(1):4254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31079-9.
5
The impact of misinformation on the COVID-19 pandemic.错误信息对新冠疫情的影响。
AIMS Public Health. 2022 Jan 12;9(2):262-277. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2022018. eCollection 2022.
波兰成年人对新冠疫苗的态度变化及接种意愿:2021年1月至4月系列横断面代表性调查分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jul 29;9(8):832. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9080832.
4
An analysis of COVID-19 vaccine sentiments and opinions on Twitter.对 Twitter 上有关 COVID-19 疫苗情绪和观点的分析。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;108:256-262. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.05.059. Epub 2021 May 27.
5
#Scamdemic, #Plandemic, or #Scaredemic: What Parler Social Media Platform Tells Us about COVID-19 Vaccine.#诈骗疫情、#阴谋疫情,还是#恐慌疫情:Parler社交媒体平台关于新冠疫苗的情况告诉了我们什么。
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Apr 22;9(5):421. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9050421.
6
Quantifying Online News Media Coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Text Mining Study and Resource.量化新冠疫情期间的在线新闻媒体报道:文本挖掘研究与资源
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 2;23(6):e28253. doi: 10.2196/28253.
7
COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy: A longitudinal study.新冠病毒肺炎与疫苗犹豫:一项纵向研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250123. eCollection 2021.
8
COVID-19 vaccine: Risk of inequality and failure of public health strategies.新冠疫苗:不平等风险与公共卫生策略的失灵
Ethics Med Public Health. 2021 Jun;17:100653. doi: 10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100653. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
9
Systematic Delineation of Media Polarity on COVID-19 Vaccines in Africa: Computational Linguistic Modeling Study.非洲新冠疫苗媒体极性的系统描述:计算语言建模研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 16;9(3):e22916. doi: 10.2196/22916.
10
The anti-vaccination infodemic on social media: A behavioral analysis.社交媒体上的反疫苗信息疫情:行为分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 3;16(3):e0247642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247642. eCollection 2021.