• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体上的反疫苗信息疫情:行为分析。

The anti-vaccination infodemic on social media: A behavioral analysis.

机构信息

Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 3;16(3):e0247642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247642. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0247642
PMID:33657152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7928468/
Abstract

Vaccinations are without doubt one of the greatest achievements of modern medicine, and there is hope that they can constitute a solution to halt the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. However, the anti-vaccination movement is currently on the rise, spreading online misinformation about vaccine safety and causing a worrying reduction in vaccination rates worldwide. In this historical time, it is imperative to understand the reasons of vaccine hesitancy, and to find effective strategies to dismantle the rhetoric of anti-vaccination supporters. For this reason, we analyzed the behavior of anti-vaccination supporters on the platform Twitter. Here we identify that anti-vaccination supporters, in comparison with pro-vaccination supporters, share conspiracy theories and make use of emotional language. We demonstrate that anti-vaccination supporters are more engaged in discussions on Twitter and share their contents from a pull of strong influencers. We show that the movement's success relies on a strong sense of community, based on the contents produced by a small fraction of profiles, with the community at large serving as a sounding board for anti-vaccination discourse to circulate online. Our data demonstrate that Donald Trump, before his profile was suspended, was the main driver of vaccine misinformation on Twitter. Based on these results, we welcome policies that aim at halting the circulation of false information about vaccines by targeting the anti-vaccination community on Twitter. Based on our data, we also propose solutions to improve the communication strategy of health organizations and build a community of engaged influencers that support the dissemination of scientific insights, including issues related to vaccines and their safety.

摘要

疫苗接种无疑是现代医学的最伟大成就之一,人们希望它们能够成为阻止当前 COVID-19 大流行的解决方案。然而,反疫苗运动目前正在抬头,在网上传播有关疫苗安全性的错误信息,导致全球疫苗接种率令人担忧地下降。在这个历史时刻,了解疫苗犹豫的原因,并找到有效策略来瓦解反疫苗支持者的言论至关重要。出于这个原因,我们分析了反疫苗支持者在 Twitter 平台上的行为。在这里,我们发现与支持疫苗接种者相比,反疫苗接种者分享阴谋论并使用情绪化语言。我们证明,反疫苗接种者在 Twitter 上更积极地参与讨论,并从强有力的影响者那里分享他们的内容。我们表明,该运动的成功依赖于强烈的社区意识,其内容是由一小部分个人资料制作的,而广大社区则是反疫苗言论在网上传播的扩音器。我们的数据表明,唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)在其个人资料被暂停之前,是 Twitter 上疫苗错误信息的主要传播者。基于这些结果,我们欢迎旨在通过针对 Twitter 上的反疫苗群体来阻止疫苗错误信息传播的政策。基于我们的数据,我们还提出了一些解决方案,以改善卫生组织的沟通策略,并建立一个支持传播科学见解的积极影响者社区,包括与疫苗及其安全性相关的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea1/7928468/0e50fcb0e76b/pone.0247642.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea1/7928468/0ed457ea5cc8/pone.0247642.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea1/7928468/2061d47256a6/pone.0247642.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea1/7928468/2606d1285454/pone.0247642.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea1/7928468/de2e1df483d8/pone.0247642.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea1/7928468/0e50fcb0e76b/pone.0247642.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea1/7928468/0ed457ea5cc8/pone.0247642.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea1/7928468/2061d47256a6/pone.0247642.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea1/7928468/2606d1285454/pone.0247642.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea1/7928468/de2e1df483d8/pone.0247642.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ea1/7928468/0e50fcb0e76b/pone.0247642.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
The anti-vaccination infodemic on social media: A behavioral analysis.社交媒体上的反疫苗信息疫情:行为分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 3;16(3):e0247642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247642. eCollection 2021.
2
Temporal trends in anti-vaccine discourse on Twitter.社交媒体上反疫苗言论的时间趋势
Vaccine. 2019 Aug 14;37(35):4867-4871. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.086. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
3
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Building a Public Twitter Data Set of Antivaccine Content, Vaccine Misinformation, and Conspiracies.社交媒体上对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫:构建一个关于反疫苗内容、疫苗错误信息和阴谋论的公共 Twitter 数据集。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 17;7(11):e30642. doi: 10.2196/30642.
4
Cross-platform spread: vaccine-related content, sources, and conspiracy theories in YouTube videos shared in early Twitter COVID-19 conversations.跨平台传播:在早期 Twitter COVID-19 对话中分享的 YouTube 视频中的疫苗相关内容、来源和阴谋论。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.2003647. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
5
COVID-19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories: The need for cognitive inoculation against misinformation to improve vaccine adherence.COVID-19 疫苗谣言和阴谋论:需要进行认知免疫接种以抵制错误信息,提高疫苗接种率。
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251605. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251605. eCollection 2021.
6
Network Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Social Media.社交媒体上的 COVID-19 疫苗错误信息的网络分析。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 Nov 18;287:165-166. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210839.
7
The dramatic increase in anti-vaccine discourses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a social network analysis of Twitter.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,反疫苗言论急剧增加:对 Twitter 的社会网络分析。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Dec 31;18(1):2025008. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.2025008. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
8
Special Feature: Countering Vaccine Misinformation.特别报道:抵制疫苗错误信息。
Am J Nurs. 2019 Oct;119(10):50-55. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000586176.77841.86.
9
Social media as a platform for health-related public debates and discussions: the Polio vaccine on Facebook.社交媒体作为健康相关公众辩论和讨论的平台:脸书上的脊髓灰质炎疫苗
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016 Nov 10;5:34. doi: 10.1186/s13584-016-0093-4. eCollection 2016.
10
Vaccine-related advertising in the Facebook Ad Archive.脸书广告档案中的疫苗相关广告。
Vaccine. 2020 Jan 16;38(3):512-520. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.066. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

1
'I think youtube's turning me into a flat earther': Social media's role in ex-conspiracy theorists entering and exiting anti-scientific communities.“我觉得YouTube正在把我变成一个地平论者”:社交媒体在有过阴谋论经历者进出反科学群体过程中的作用。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 16;20(6):e0323436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323436. eCollection 2025.
2
Relative engagement with sources of climate misinformation is growing across social media platforms.在社交媒体平台上,与气候错误信息来源的相对接触正在增加。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 28;15(1):18629. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03082-9.
3
An 'arsenal for the supply of ammunition for the defence of vaccination': the Jenner Society and anti-anti-vaccinationism in England, 1896-1906.

本文引用的文献

1
Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Sentiment Analysis from June 2011 to April 2019.社交媒体上的疫苗犹豫情绪:2011年6月至2019年4月的情感分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jan 7;9(1):28. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9010028.
2
Comparing covariation among vaccine hesitancy and broader beliefs within Twitter and survey data.比较 Twitter 数据和调查数据中疫苗犹豫与更广泛信念之间的共变。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 8;15(10):e0239826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239826. eCollection 2020.
3
The online anti-vaccine movement in the age of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代的线上反疫苗运动。
“为疫苗接种辩护的弹药供应库”:詹纳协会与1896年至1906年英国的反反疫苗接种主义
Med Hist. 2025 Jan;69(1):76-98. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2024.28. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
4
COVID-19 vaccines as a game-changing tool? A corpus-based study of vaccine communication in People's Daily and The New York Times.新冠疫苗是一种改变游戏规则的工具?一项基于语料库的《人民日报》与《纽约时报》疫苗相关报道研究
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 17;11(2):e42082. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42082. eCollection 2025 Jan 30.
5
Dynamics and triggers of misinformation on vaccines.疫苗错误信息的动态变化与触发因素
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 15;20(1):e0316258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316258. eCollection 2025.
6
Dynamics of communication on measles vaccination on digital platforms in the Brazilian context: challenges and perspectives.巴西背景下数字平台上麻疹疫苗接种的传播动态:挑战与展望。
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2024 Dec 6;66:e68. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946202466068. eCollection 2024.
7
Psychological factors contributing to the creation and dissemination of fake news among social media users: a systematic review.社交媒体用户制造和传播虚假新闻的心理因素:系统评价。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Nov 18;12(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02129-2.
8
Computing advertising intelligent computing and push based on artificial intelligence in the big data era.大数据时代基于人工智能的计算广告智能计算与推送。
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 30;10(17):e37252. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37252. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
9
Determining factors for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among Brazilians: a study using structural equation modeling.巴西人对 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫不决的决定因素:使用结构方程模型的研究。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Aug 30;77Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e20240112. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0112. eCollection 2024.
10
Sentiment analysis of Indonesian tweets on COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccinations.对印尼关于 COVID-19 和 COVID-19 疫苗的推文进行情感分析。
F1000Res. 2024 Apr 16;12:1007. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.130610.3. eCollection 2023.
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Oct;2(10):e504-e505. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30227-2. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
4
The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views.支持和反对疫苗接种观点的在线竞争。
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7811):230-233. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2281-1. Epub 2020 May 13.
5
A future vaccination campaign against COVID-19 at risk of vaccine hesitancy and politicisation.未来针对新冠病毒的疫苗接种运动面临疫苗犹豫和政治化的风险。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;20(7):769-770. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30426-6. Epub 2020 May 20.
6
The Easier the Better? Comparing the Readability and Engagement of Online Pro- and Anti-Vaccination Articles.越简单越好?比较支持和反对疫苗接种的网络文章的可读性与吸引力。
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Oct;46(5):790-797. doi: 10.1177/1090198119853614. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
7
Association of moral values with vaccine hesitancy.道德价值观与疫苗犹豫的关联。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Dec;1(12):873-880. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0256-5. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
8
It's not all about autism: The emerging landscape of anti-vaccination sentiment on Facebook.并非全是自闭症:脸书上反疫苗情绪的新面貌。
Vaccine. 2019 Apr 10;37(16):2216-2223. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
9
Populist politics and vaccine hesitancy in Western Europe: an analysis of national-level data.民粹主义政治与西欧的疫苗犹豫:基于国家级数据的分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2019 Jun 1;29(3):512-516. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz004.
10
Beyond confidence: Development of a measure assessing the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination.超越信心:评估疫苗接种 5C 心理前因的测量工具的开发。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 7;13(12):e0208601. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208601. eCollection 2018.