Bodey Thomas W, Angulo Elena, Bang Alok, Bellard Céline, Fantle-Lepczyk Jean, Lenzner Bernd, Turbelin Anna, Watari Yuya, Courchamp Franck
School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, King's College, Aberdeen, UK.
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Orsay, France.
Conserv Biol. 2023 Apr;37(2):e14034. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14034. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
Biological invasions represent a key threat to insular systems and have pronounced impacts across environments and economies. The ecological impacts have received substantial focus, but the socioeconomic impacts are poorly synthesized across spatial and temporal scales. We used the InvaCost database, the most comprehensive assessment of published economic costs of invasive species, to assess economic impacts on islands worldwide. We analyzed socioeconomic costs across differing expenditure types and examined temporal trends across islands that differ in their political geography-island nation states, overseas territories, and islands of continental countries. Over US$36 billion in total costs (including damages and management) has occurred on islands from 1965 to 2020 due to invasive species' impacts. Nation states incurred the greatest total and management costs, and islands of continental countries incurred costs of similar magnitude, both far higher than those in overseas territories. Damage-loss costs were significantly lower, but with qualitatively similar patterns across differing political geographies. The predominance of management spending differs from the pattern found for most countries examined and suggests important knowledge gaps in the extent of many damage-related socioeconomic impacts. Nation states spent the greatest proportion of their gross domestic products countering these costs, at least 1 order of magnitude higher than other locations. Most costs were borne by authorities and stakeholders, demonstrating the key role of governmental and nongovernmental bodies in addressing island invasions. Temporal trends revealed cost increases across all island types, potentially reflecting efforts to tackle invasive species at larger, more socially complex scales. Nevertheless, the already high total economic costs of island invasions substantiate the role of biosecurity in reducing and preventing invasive species arrivals to reduce strains on limited financial resources and avoid threats to sustainable development goals.
生物入侵是岛屿系统面临的关键威胁,对环境和经济产生了显著影响。生态影响已受到广泛关注,但社会经济影响在时空尺度上的综合研究较少。我们使用了InvaCost数据库(对已发表的入侵物种经济成本最全面的评估)来评估全球岛屿的经济影响。我们分析了不同支出类型的社会经济成本,并研究了政治地理不同的岛屿(岛国、海外领地和大陆国家的岛屿)的时间趋势。1965年至2020年期间,由于入侵物种的影响,岛屿上发生的总成本(包括损害和管理成本)超过360亿美元。民族国家承担了最大的总成本和管理成本,大陆国家的岛屿承担了类似规模的成本,两者都远高于海外领地。损害损失成本显著较低,但在不同政治地理区域的模式在性质上相似。管理支出的主导地位与大多数被研究国家的模式不同,这表明在许多与损害相关的社会经济影响程度方面存在重要的知识空白。民族国家在应对这些成本时,花费了其国内生产总值中最大的比例,至少比其他地区高一个数量级。大多数成本由当局和利益相关者承担,这表明政府和非政府机构在应对岛屿入侵方面发挥了关键作用。时间趋势显示,所有岛屿类型的成本都在增加,这可能反映了在更大、社会复杂性更高的规模上应对入侵物种的努力。尽管如此,岛屿入侵已经很高的总经济成本证实了生物安全在减少和防止入侵物种到来方面的作用,以减轻对有限财政资源的压力,并避免对可持续发展目标的威胁。