• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在路径社区 HUB 模式项目中,产前保健利用率的充足性:倾向评分匹配分析的结果。

Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization in a Pathways Community HUB Model Program: Results of a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

机构信息

College of Public Health, Kent State University, 750 Hilltop Drive, 339 Lowry Hall, P.O. Box 5190, 44242, Kent, OH, United States.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2023 Mar;27(3):459-467. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03522-2. Epub 2022 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1007/s10995-022-03522-2
PMID:36352282
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The THRIVE (Toward Health Resiliency and Infant Vitality & Equity) program aims to reduce racial disparities in birth outcomes by addressing individual risks and social determinants of health using the Pathways Community HUB model. This study examines (1) racial disparities among THRIVE participants and propensity score matched (PSM) comparisons in adequacy of prenatal care, and whether THRIVE participation (2) attenuates such disparities, and (3) improves odds of having adequate prenatal care.

METHODS

Birth certificate and Care Coordination Systems client data were merged for analysis. PSM was employed for 1:1 matching per birth year (2017-2020) and race for participating and non-participating first-time births in Stark County, Ohio. Additional matching variables were age, marital status, education attainment, birth quarter, census tract poverty rate, and Women Infant & Children (WIC) enrollment. Logistic regression assessed racial differences in adequate prenatal care utilization (APNCU) and examined differences between the intervention and comparison groups on APNCU.

RESULTS

THRIVE participants averaged more prenatal care visits and had a higher percentage of adequate care utilization than the comparison group. THRIVE program participation, educational attainment, and WIC enrollment were associated with higher odds of adequate prenatal care utilization (OR 4.74; 95% CI 2.62, 8.57). Race was not significant for APNCU.

DISCUSSION

Although accessing and maintaining prenatal care is only one aspect of improving birth outcomes, the findings contribute to the understanding of the effects of the program of interest and other similar programs on factors which may promote desired birth outcomes in high-risk populations.

摘要

简介

THRIVE(促进健康复原力和婴儿活力与公平)计划旨在通过使用 Pathways 社区中心模型解决个人健康风险和社会决定因素,减少出生结果中的种族差异。本研究考察了:(1)THRIVE 参与者中的种族差异和倾向评分匹配(PSM)比较在产前保健充足性方面的差异,以及(2)THRIVE 参与是否减轻了这些差异,以及(3)是否提高了获得充足产前保健的几率。

方法

将出生证明和护理协调系统客户数据合并进行分析。采用 PSM 按出生年份(2017-2020 年)和种族对俄亥俄州斯塔克县首次参与和非参与的分娩进行 1:1 匹配。其他匹配变量包括年龄、婚姻状况、教育程度、分娩季度、普查区贫困率和妇女、婴儿和儿童(WIC)的参与情况。逻辑回归评估了种族间充分利用产前保健的差异,并比较了干预组和对照组在充分利用产前保健方面的差异。

结果

THRIVE 参与者的平均产前保健就诊次数更多,充分利用产前保健的比例也更高。THRIVE 项目参与、教育程度和 WIC 参与与更高的充分利用产前保健几率相关(OR 4.74;95%CI 2.62,8.57)。种族对 APNCU 没有显著影响。

讨论

尽管获得和维持产前保健只是改善出生结果的一个方面,但这些发现有助于了解计划的影响和其他类似计划对可能促进高危人群期望的出生结果的因素的影响。

相似文献

1
Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization in a Pathways Community HUB Model Program: Results of a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.在路径社区 HUB 模式项目中,产前保健利用率的充足性:倾向评分匹配分析的结果。
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Mar;27(3):459-467. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03522-2. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
2
The "Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization" (APNCU) index to study low birth weight: is the index biased?用于研究低出生体重的“产前护理利用充分性”(APNCU)指数:该指数存在偏差吗?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Mar;55(3):296-305. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00471-1.
3
Social determinants of health and disparities in prenatal care utilization during the Great Recession period 2005-2010.大衰退时期(2005-2010 年)的健康社会决定因素与产前保健利用差距。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 29;19(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2486-1.
4
Pathways community care coordination in low birth weight prevention.低出生体重预防中的社区护理协调途径。
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Mar;19(3):643-50. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1554-4.
5
The effect of family planning participation on prenatal care use and low birth weight.参与计划生育对产前护理利用和低出生体重的影响。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1992 Sep-Oct;24(5):214-8.
6
Influence of the Adequacy of the Prenatal Care Utilization Index on Small-For-Gestational-Age Infants and Preterm Births in the United States.产前护理利用指数充足性对美国小于胎龄儿和早产的影响。
J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 12;8(6):838. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060838.
7
One size does not fit all: an examination of low birthweight disparities among a diverse set of racial/ethnic groups.一刀切并不适用:对多样化的种族/族裔群体中的低出生体重差异进行考察。
Matern Child Health J. 2009 Nov;13(6):769-79. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0476-z. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
8
The impact of prenatal WIC participation on infant mortality and racial disparities.产前 WIC 参与对婴儿死亡率和种族差异的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr 1;100 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S204-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.168922. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
9
Does Increasing Access to Prenatal Care Reduce Racial Disparities in Birth Outcomes?增加产前护理的可及性是否能减少出生结局的种族差异?
J Pediatr Nurs. 2021 Jul-Aug;59:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.01.012. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
10
Racial disparities in adequacy of prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina, 2018-2021.2018-2021 年期间,南卡罗来纳州 COVID-19 大流行期间产前护理充足度的种族差异。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Sep 23;23(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05983-x.

引用本文的文献

1
An Evaluation of the Pathways Community HUB Approach To Improving Birth Outcomes: A Retrospective Study Using Propensity Score Matching in Richland, Ohio.评估路径社区中心改善分娩结局的方法:一项在俄亥俄州里奇兰使用倾向得分匹配的回顾性研究。
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04172-w.
2
Brief Scoping Review of Pathways Community Hubs for the Care of Pregnant Mothers and Their Infants.针对孕妇及其婴儿护理的途径社区中心简要范围综述。
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Mar;29(3):304-309. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04042-5. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
3
Financing community partnerships for health equity: Findings and insights from cross-sector professionals.

本文引用的文献

1
Embracing the complexity of modifiable risk reduction: A registry of modifiable risks for 0-12 month infants.接受可改变的风险降低的复杂性:一项针对0至12个月婴儿可改变风险的登记研究。
Prev Med. 2020 Aug;137:106118. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106118. Epub 2020 May 6.
2
Social determinants of health and disparities in prenatal care utilization during the Great Recession period 2005-2010.大衰退时期(2005-2010 年)的健康社会决定因素与产前保健利用差距。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 29;19(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2486-1.
3
Social determinants of health and adverse maternal and birth outcomes in adolescent pregnancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
为健康公平筹资建立社区伙伴关系:跨部门专业人员的发现和见解。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e14237. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14237. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
青少年怀孕中健康的社会决定因素与不良孕产妇及分娩结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;33(1):88-99. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12529. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
4
Exploring the social determinants of racial/ethnic disparities in prenatal care utilization and maternal outcome.探讨产前护理利用和母婴结局方面种族/民族差异的社会决定因素。
Semin Perinatol. 2017 Aug;41(5):308-317. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
5
Pathways community care coordination in low birth weight prevention.低出生体重预防中的社区护理协调途径。
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Mar;19(3):643-50. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1554-4.
6
Inadequate prenatal care utilization and risks of infant mortality and poor birth outcome: a retrospective analysis of 28,729,765 U.S. deliveries over 8 years.不足的产前保健利用与婴儿死亡率和不良出生结局风险:对超过 8 年的 28729765 例美国分娩的回顾性分析。
Am J Perinatol. 2012 Nov;29(10):787-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1316439. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
7
Maternal risk factors for preterm birth: a country-based population analysis.母亲因素与早产的关系:基于国家的人群分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Dec;159(2):342-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.09.024. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
8
An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.倾向得分法在观察性研究中减少混杂效应的介绍
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
9
Why match? Investigating matched case-control study designs with causal effect estimation.为何进行匹配?探讨用于因果效应估计的匹配病例对照研究设计。
Int J Biostat. 2009 Jan 6;5(1):Article 1. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1127.
10
Area-level poverty and preterm birth risk: a population-based multilevel analysis.地区层面的贫困与早产风险:一项基于人群的多层次分析。
BMC Public Health. 2008 Sep 15;8:316. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-316.