Suppr超能文献

赌博运营商提供个性化反馈干预对荷兰在线赌客后续赌博支出的影响。

The Impact of Personalized Feedback Interventions by a Gambling Operator on Subsequent Gambling Expenditure in a Sample of Dutch Online Gamblers.

机构信息

neccton Ltd, Muhlgasse 23, 9900, Lienz, Austria.

International Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, NG1 4FQ, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2023 Jun;39(2):929-946. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10162-2. Epub 2022 Nov 9.

Abstract

Player protection has become an important area for the gambling industry over the past decade. A number of gambling regulators now require gambling operators to interact with customers if they suspect they are gambling in a problematic way. The present study provided insight on the impact of personalized feedback interventions (PFIs) on subsequent gambling behavior among a Dutch sample of real-world gamblers. Nederlandse Loterij (the national Dutch Lottery operator) provided access to a secondary dataset comprising tracking data from online casino and sports betting gamblers (N = 2,576) who were contacted either by e-mail or telephone between November 2021 and March 2022 if they showed signs of problematic gambling as identified using behavioral tracking software. Compared to matched controls (n = 369,961 gamblers), Dutch gamblers who received a PFI (via e-mail [n = 1876] or a telephone call [n = 700]) from the gambling operator had a significant reduction in amount of money deposited, amount of money wagered, number of monetary deposits, and time spent gambling in the 30 days after being contacted. Gambling frequency as measured by the number of gambling days did not change significantly after a PFI. Telephone calls did not lead to a significant larger reduction with respect to the aforementioned behavioral metrics. High-intensity players reduced their gambling behavior as frequently as low-intensity players, which means that the intervention's success was independent of gambling intensity. The impact on subsequent gambling was the same across age groups and gender. The results of the present study are of use to many different stakeholder groups including researchers in the gambling studies field and the gambling industry as well as regulators and policymakers who can recommend or enforce that gambling operators utilize responsible gambling tools such as using PFIs to those who may be displaying problematic gambling behaviors as a way of minimizing harm and protecting gamblers.

摘要

在过去十年中,保护玩家已成为娱乐业的一个重要领域。现在,许多赌博监管机构要求博彩运营商在怀疑客户以有问题的方式赌博时与客户互动。本研究提供了关于个性化反馈干预 (PFI) 对荷兰真实世界赌客随后赌博行为影响的见解。荷兰乐透 (荷兰国家彩票运营商) 提供了对二级数据集的访问权限,该数据集包含来自在线赌场和体育博彩赌客的跟踪数据(N=2576),如果他们使用行为跟踪软件识别出有问题的赌博迹象,他们将在 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 3 月期间通过电子邮件或电话联系这些赌客。与匹配的对照组(n=369961 名赌客)相比,收到赌博运营商 PFI(通过电子邮件[n=1876]或电话[n=700])的荷兰赌客在被联系后的 30 天内,存款金额、下注金额、货币存款次数和赌博时间都显著减少。用赌博天数衡量的赌博频率在收到 PFI 后没有明显变化。与上述行为指标相比,电话呼叫并没有导致显著更大的减少。高强度玩家和低强度玩家一样频繁地减少赌博行为,这意味着干预的成功与赌博强度无关。后续赌博的影响在不同年龄组和性别中是相同的。本研究的结果对许多不同的利益相关者群体都有帮助,包括赌博研究领域的研究人员和赌博业以及监管机构和政策制定者,他们可以建议或强制要求赌博运营商对可能显示出有问题赌博行为的人使用负责任的赌博工具,例如使用 PFI,以尽量减少伤害并保护赌客。

相似文献

3
The use of personalized behavioral feedback for online gamblers: an empirical study.
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 23;6:1406. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01406. eCollection 2015.
4
Self-reported Deposits Versus Actual Deposits in Online Gambling: An Empirical Study.
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):619-637. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10230-1. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
6
The effect of loss-limit reminders on gambling behavior: A real-world study of Norwegian gamblers.
J Behav Addict. 2018 Dec 1;7(4):1056-1067. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.106. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
9
Gambling Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Online Casino Gamblers: An Empirical Study Using Behavioral Tracking Data.
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(3):1722-1732. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00462-2. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
10
The Effects of Voluntary Deposit Limit-Setting on Long-Term Online Gambling Expenditure.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020 Feb;23(2):113-118. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0202. Epub 2019 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Gambling in Young Adults Aged 17-24 Years: A Population-Based Study.
J Gambl Stud. 2020 Sep;36(3):747-766. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09948-z.
3
Deposit Limit Prompt in Online Gambling for Reducing Gambling Intensity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 28;10:639. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00639. eCollection 2019.
4
A Meta-analysis of Brief Personalized Feedback Interventions for Problematic Gambling.
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Jun;35(2):447-464. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-09818-9.
5
The effect of loss-limit reminders on gambling behavior: A real-world study of Norwegian gamblers.
J Behav Addict. 2018 Dec 1;7(4):1056-1067. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.106. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
6
A Comparison of Online Versus Offline Gambling Harm in Portuguese Pathological Gamblers: An Empirical Study.
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2018;16(5):1219-1237. doi: 10.1007/s11469-017-9846-8. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
8
Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial.
Addiction. 2018 May;113(5):883-895. doi: 10.1111/add.14149. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
9
10
Personalized Behavioral Feedback for Online Gamblers: A Real World Empirical Study.
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 28;7:1875. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01875. eCollection 2016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验