Department of General Practice, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Fleischmannstrasse 6, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, European University of Applied Sciences, Rostock, Germany.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 9;22(1):1330. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08691-y.
Although chronic kidney disease (CKD) is highly prevalent in the general population, little research has been conducted on CKD management in ambulatory care. Objective was to assess management and quality of care by evaluating CKD coding in ambulatory care, patient diagnosis awareness, frequency of monitoring and whether appropriate patients are referred to nephrology.
Clinical data from the population-based cohort Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP-START) were matched with claims data of the Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. Quality of care was evaluated according international and German recommendations.
Data from 1778 participants (56% female, mean age 59 years) were analysed. 10% had eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m (mean age 74 years), 15% had albuminuria. 21% had CKD as defined by KDIGO. 20% of these were coded and 7% self-reported having CKD. Coding increased with GFR stage (G3a 20%, G3b 61%, G4 75%, G5 100%). Serum creatinine and urinary dip stick testing were billed in the majority of all participants regardless of renal function. Testing frequency partially surpassed recommendations. Nephrology consultation was billed in few cases with stage G3b-G4.
CKD coding increased with stage and was performed reliably in stages ≥ G4, while CKD awareness was low. Adherence to monitoring and referral criteria varied, depending on the applicability of monitoring criteria. For assessing quality of care, consent on monitoring, patient education, referral criteria and coordination of care needs to be established, accounting for patient related factors, including age and comorbidity.
This study was prospectively registered as DRKS00009812 in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS).
尽管慢性肾脏病(CKD)在普通人群中患病率很高,但在门诊护理中对 CKD 管理的研究甚少。目的是通过评估门诊护理中的 CKD 编码、患者诊断意识、监测频率以及是否将合适的患者转介给肾病科,来评估 CKD 的管理和护理质量。
从基于人群的什未林健康研究(SHIP-START)的临床数据与法定健康保险医师协会的索赔数据进行匹配。根据国际和德国的建议评估护理质量。
分析了 1778 名参与者(56%为女性,平均年龄 59 岁)的数据。10%的参与者估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)<60ml/min/1.73m(平均年龄 74 岁),15%的参与者有白蛋白尿。21%的参与者符合 KDIGO 定义的 CKD。这些患者中有 20%被编码,7%自我报告患有 CKD。编码随着肾小球滤过率(G3a 为 20%,G3b 为 61%,G4 为 75%,G5 为 100%)的增加而增加。无论肾功能如何,大多数参与者的血清肌酐和尿液试纸检测都有计费。检测频率部分超过了建议。在 G3b-G4 阶段,很少有患者进行肾病科会诊。
随着阶段的增加,CKD 编码增加,并且在 G3b-G4 阶段可靠地进行,而 CKD 意识较低。监测和转介标准的依从性各不相同,具体取决于监测标准的适用性。为了评估护理质量,需要建立监测、患者教育、转介标准和护理协调的同意,考虑到患者相关因素,包括年龄和合并症。
本研究在德国临床试验注册中心(DRKS)前瞻性注册为 DRKS00009812。